Abstract
One manifestation of argumentation is in critical discussions where people genuinely strive cooperatively to achieve critical decisions. Hence, argumentation can be recognized as the process of advancing, supporting, modifying, and criticizing claims so that appropriate decision makers may grant or deny adherence. This audience-centered definition holds the assumption that the participants must willingly engage in public debate and discussion, and their arguments must function to open a critical space and keep it open. This essay investigates `ideological pronouncement,' a kind of rhetoric that undermines and limits the possibility of critical discussion among target audiences, as an enemy of sound argumentation. First, the essential characteristics of sound argumentation are explained. Next, the typical characteristics of ideological rhetoric are described. At the same time, the Cardinal Principles of the National Entity of Japan, a Japanese wartime moral education textbook, is examined as a paradigm case of ideological rhetoric. Third, three key pronouncements of the Cardinal Principles are outlined and discussed. Finally, implications from the critical discussion are drawn.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Ajisawa, Makoto: 1991, ‘Wa no shiso to nihonseishinshugi-Kokutai No Hongi no seiritsukatei’ (The Ideology of ‘Harmony’ and Japanese Spiritualism: The Formation Process of the Kokutai No Hongi) in ‘Nihonbunkaron’ hihan – ‘bunka’ o yosoou kikenshiso (The Critique on Japanology: Dangerous Thought Disguised as ‘Culture’), Suiyosha, Tokyo, pp. 159-185.
Anderson, Benedict: 1983, 1991, Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism, Verso, London.
Aristotle: 1991, On Rhetoric: A Theory of Civic Discourse (Trans, with introduction, notes and appendices by George A. Kennedy), Oxford University Press, NY.
Berger, Peter L. and Thomas Luckmann: 1989, The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge, Anchor Books, New York.
Brockriede, Wayne: 1974, ‘Rhetorical Criticism as Argument’, Quarterly Journal of Speech 60, 165-174.
Burke, Kenneth: 1968, ‘Dramatism’, in David L. Sills (ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, Vol. 7, The Macmillan Company & The Free Press, London, pp. 445-452.
Burke, Kenneth: 1967, ‘The Rhetoric of Hitler's “Battle”’, in The Philosophy of Literary Form, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, pp. 191-220.
Devito, Joseph A.: 1995, The Interpersonal Communication Book, 7th ed., HarperCollins College Publishers, NY.
Farrell, Thomas B. and G. Thomas Goodnight: 1981, ‘Accidental Rhetoric: The Root Metaphors of Three Mile Island’, Communication Monographs 48, 271-300.
Frye, Northrop: 1957, Anatomy of Criticism: Four Essays, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
Garon, Sheldon M.: 1986, ‘State and Religion in Imperial Japan, 1912-1945’, Journal of Japanese Studies 12, 273-302.
Habermas, Jürgen: 1984, Theory of Communicative Action. Vol.1: Reason and the Rationalization of Society, Beacon Press, Boston, MA.
Hall, Robert K. (ed.): 1943, Kokutai No Hongi: Cardinal Principles of the National Entity of Japan (1949) Trans. by John Owen Gauntlet with an introduction by Robert King Hall, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Hall, Robert K.: 1943, ‘Prefatory Note’, in Cardinal Principles, pp. v-vi.
Hegel, George Wilhelm Friedrich: 1975, ‘The Course of World History’, in Lectures on the Philosophy of World History, Introduction: Reasons in History, Cambridge University Press, NY, pp. 124-151.
Holtom, D.C.: 1943, Modern Japan and Shinto Nationalism: A Study of Present-Day Trends in Japanese Religions, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
Honderich, Ted (ed.): 1995, Oxford Companion to Philosophy, Oxford University Press, London.
Matsumoto, Shigeru and Takeshi Suzuki: 1991, ‘Academic Debate Theory: Its Application to Business English Communication Training in Japan’, Argument in Controversy, SCA, Annandale, VA, 398-403.
Matsuoka, Yousuke: 1975, ‘Proclamation of the Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere’, as quoted by Joyce C. Lebra. Japan's Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere in World War II: Selected Readings and Documents, Oxford University Press, London, pp. 71-72.
McGee, Michael C. and Martha A. Martin: 1983, ‘Public Knowledge and Ideological Argumentation’, Communication Monographs 50, 47-65.
Mumby, Dennis K.: 1989, ‘Ideology & the Social Construction of Meaning: A Communication Perspective’, Communication Quarterly 37, 291-304.
Murakami, Shigeyoshi: 1970, Kokka shinto (State Shinto), Iwanami Shoten, Tokyo.
Nagahara, Keiji: 1983, Koukokushikan (The Imperial View of History), Iwanami Shoten, Tokyo.
Neuendroff, H.: 1975, 'soziologie', in Evangelisches Staastslexikon (Stuttgart) 2424ff, as quoted by Habermas (1984), 18.
Perelman, Chaim and L. Olbrechts-Tyteca: 1971, The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, IN.
Rieke, Richard D. and Malcolm O. Sillars: 1993, Argumentation: Critical Decision Making, 3rd ed., HarperCollins College Publishers, NY.
Suzuki, Takeshi: 1996, A Rhetorical Analysis of Japan's Dramas of Modernity and Emperor Hirohito's Wartime Role, UMI, Ann Arbor, MI.
Tsurumi, Kazuko: 1970, ‘Socialization for Death: Moral Education at School and in the Army’, in Social Change and the Individual: Japan Before and After Defeat in World War II, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, pp. 99-137.
Tsurumi, Shunsuke: 1982, An Intellectual History of Wartime Japan: 1931-1945, Methuen Inc., Routledge & Kegan Paul, New York.
van Eemeren, Frans H. and Rob Grootendorst (eds.): 1996, Fundamentals of Argumentation Theory: A Handbook of Historical Backgrounds and Contemporary Developments, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, Mahwah, NJ.
Weiler, Michael: 1993, ‘Ideology, Rhetoric and Argument’, Informal Logic 15, 15-28.
Wright, Richard L. and Hailu Fullers Hailu: 1988-1989, ‘Conceptualizing Language as Ideology’, Howard Journal of Communications 1, 174-186.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Suzuki, T. The Cardinal Principles of the National Entity of Japan: A Rhetoric of Ideological Pronouncement. Argumentation 15, 251–266 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011128317115
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011128317115