Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Qualitative-Quantitative Distinction in Political Science

  • Chapter
The Qualitative-Quantitative Distinction in the Social Sciences

Part of the book series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science ((BSPS,volume 112))

  • 176 Accesses

Abstract

In the School of political Projectors I was but ill entertained; the Professors appearing in my Judgment wholly out of their Senses; which was a Scene that never fails to make me melancholy.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alker, Hayward (1975), ‘Polimetrics: its descriptive foundations,’ Handbook of Political Science, eds. F. Greenstein and N. Polsby, 8: 139–210. Reading: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alker, Hayward (1976), ‘Research paradigms and mathematical politics,’ Sozialwissenschaftliches Jahrbuch für Politik, ed. R. Wildenmann, 5: 13–50. Munich: Günter Olzog Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alker, Hayward (1979), ‘From information processing research to the sciences of human communication,’ Informatique et Sciences Humaines 40–41: 407–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alker, Hayward (1982), ‘Logic, dialectics, politics: some recent controversies.’ Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and Humanities, ed. H. Alker, 7. Amsterdam: Rodopi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, Richard (1978), The Restructuring of Social and Political Theory. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumer, Herbert (1969), Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boynton, G. R. (1980), Mathematical Thinking about Politics: An Introduction to Discrete Time Systems. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Steven (1974), `Intensive analysis in political research,’ Political Methodology 1: 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cicourel, Aaron (1964), Method and Measurement in Sociology. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, Robert (1956), A Preface to Democratic Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietz, Mary (1986), `Trapping the prince: Machiavelli and the politics of deception,’ American Political Science Review 80: 777–799.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edelman, Murray (1977), Political Language. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelman, Murray (1985), The Symbolic Uses of Politics, 2nd edn. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eulau, Heinz (1969), `The maddening methods of Harold D. Lasswell: some philosophical underpinnings,’ Politics, Personality, and Social Science in the Twentieth Century: Essays in Honor of Harold D. Lasswell, ed. A. Rogow. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenno, Richard (1978), `Notes on method: participant observation,’ Appendix to Home Style: Flouse Members in Their Districts. Boston: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenno, Richard (1986), `Observation, context, and sequence in the study of politics,’ American Political Science Review 80: 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glassner, B. and Loughlin, J. (1987), Drugs in Adolescent Worlds: Burnouts to Straights. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gosnell, Harold (1927), Getting Out the Vote: An Experiment in the Stimulation of Voting. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gosnell, Harold (1937), Machine Politics: Chicago Model. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karl, Barry (1974), Charles E. Merriam and the Study of Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kweit, M. and Kweit, R. (1981), Concepts and Methods for Political Analysis. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laski, Harold (1926), On the Study of Politics: An Inaugural Lecture Delivered at the London School of Economics and Political Science on 22 October 1926. Oxford: Humphrey Milford/Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasswell, Harold (1927), Propaganda Techniques in the World War. New York: A. A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasswell, Harold (1935), World Politics and Personal Insecurity. New York: Whittlesey House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasswell, Harold (1936), Politics: Who Gets What, When, How. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasswell, Harold (1948), `General framework: person, personality, group, culture,’ The Analysis of Political Behaviour: An Empirical Approach. New York: Oxford University Press. Orig. pubi. Psychiatry 2 (1939): 375–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasswell, Harold (1949), `Why be quantitative?’, Language of Politics: Studies in Quantitative Semantics, H. Lasswell, N. Leites et al. New York: George W. Stewart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasswell, Harold (1951), Psychopathology and Politics, in The Political Writings of Harold D. Lasswell. Glencoe: Free Press. Orig. pubi. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasswell, Harold (1961), ‘The qualitative and quantitative in political and legal analysis,’ Quantity and Quality, ed. D. Lerner. Glencoe: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasswell, Harold (1971), `The cross-disciplinary manifold: the Chicago prototype,’ The Search for World Order: Studies by Students and Colleagues of Quincy Wright, eds. A. Lepawsky, E. Buehrig, and H. Lasswell. New York: AppletonCentury-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasswell, H. and Kaplan, A. (1950), Power and Society: A Framework for Political Inquiry. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maclntyre, Alasdair (1971), ‘Is a science of comparative politics possible?’ Against the Self-Images of the Age. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manheim, J. and Rich, R. (1981), Empirical Political Analysis: Research Methods in Political Science. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martindale, Don (1981), The Nature and Types of Sociological Theory, 2nd edn. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marvick, Dwaine (1977), ‘Introduction: context, problems, and methods,’ Harold D. Lasswell on Political Sociology, ed. D. Marvick. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayhew, David (1974), Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, George Herbert (1934), Mind, Self, and Society from the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist, ed. C. Morris. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merriam, Charles (1920), American Political Ideas: Studies in the Development of American Political Thought, 1865–1917. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merriam, Charles (1922), The American Party System: An Introduction to the Study of Political Parties in the United States. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merriam, Charles (1925), New Aspects of Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merriam, Charles (1934), Political Power: Its Composition and Incidence. New York: Whittlesey House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merriam, Charles (1942), ‘The education of Charles E. Merriam,’ The Future of Government in the United States: Essays in Honor of Charles E. Merriam, ed. L. White. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merriam, C. and Gosnell, H. (1924), Non-voting: Causes and Methods of Control. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merriam, C. and Gosnell, H. (1929), The American Party System: An Introduction to the Study of Political Parties in the United States, rev. edn. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merriam, C. and Gosnell, H. (1940), The American Party System: An Introduction to the Study of Political Parties in the United States, 3rd edn. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merriam, C. and Gosnell, H. (1949), The American Party System: An Introduction to the Study of Political Parties in the United States, 4th edn. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, Robert (1925), ‘The city: suggestions for the investigation of human behavior in the urban environment,’ The City, by R. Park, E. Burgess, and R. McKenzie. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitkin, Hanna (1972), Wittgenstein and Justice. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, Livia (1985), Telling the American Story: A Structural and Cultural Analysis of Conversational Storytelling. Norwood: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redfield, Robert (1930), Teportlan, A Mexican Village: A Study of Folk Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, Stuart (1928), Quantitative Methods in Politics. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosten, Leo (1969), ‘Harold Lasswell: a memoir,’ Politics, Personality, and Social Science in the Twentieth Century: Essays in Honor of Harold D. Lasswell, ed. A. Rogow. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartori, G., Riggs, F., and Teune, H. (1975), `Tower of Babel: on the definition and analysis of concepts in the social sciences,’ Occasional Paper 6. Pittsburgh: International Studies Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, James (1976), The Moral Economy of the Peasant: Rebellion and Subsistence in Southeast Asia. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, James (1985), Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuman, Frederick L. (1933), International Politics: An Introduction to the Western State System. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, Joseph (1954), History of Economic Analysis, ed. E. Schumpeter. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, H. and Jacobs, J. (1979), Qualitative Sociology: A Method to the Madness. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Bruce (1969), `The mystifying intellectual history of Harold D. Lasswell,’ Politics, Personality, and Social Science in the Twentieth Century: Essays in Honor of Harold D. Lasswell, ed. A. Rogow. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Somit, A. and Tanenhaus, J. (1967), The Development of American Political Science: From Burgess to Behavioralism. Boston: Ally and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spradley, James (1979), The Ethnographic Interview. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sylvan, D. and Glassner, B. (1985), A Rationalist Methodology for the Social Sciences. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Charles (1971), ‘Interpretation and the sciences of man,’ Review of Metaphysics 25: 3–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, Leonard (1929), The Prestige Value of Public Employment in Chicago. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wirth, Louis (1928), The Ghetto. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wirth, Louis (1936), Preface to K. Mannheim, Ideology and Utopia, trans. L. Wirth and E. Shils. New York: Harcourt, Brace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wirth, Louis, ed. (1940), Eleven Twenty-Six: A Decade of Social Science Research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, Quincy (1965), A Study of War, 2nd edn. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Orig. Publ. 1942.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. David J. Sylvan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Sociology, University of Connecticut, USA

    Barry Glassner

  2. Division of Humanities in Medicine, SUNY Health Science Center at Brooklyn, USA

    Jonathan D. Moreno

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1989 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sylvan, D.J. (1989). The Qualitative-Quantitative Distinction in Political Science. In: Glassner, B., Moreno, J.D. (eds) The Qualitative-Quantitative Distinction in the Social Sciences. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 112. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3444-8_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3444-8_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-8460-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-3444-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation