Skip to main content
Log in

In hate we trust: The collectivization and habitualization of hatred

  • Published:
Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the face of longstanding philosophical debates on the nature of hatred and an ever-growing interest in the underlying social-psychological function of group-directed or genocidal hatred, the peculiar affective intentionality of hatred is still very little understood. By drawing on resources from classical phenomenology, recent social-scientific research and analytic philosophy of emotions, I shall argue that the affective intentionality of hatred is distinctive in three interrelated ways: (1) it has an overgeneralizing, indeterminate affective focus, which typically leads to a form of collectivization of the target; (2) short of a determinate affective focus, haters derive the indeed extreme affective powers of the attitude not in reaction to any specific features or actions of the targets or from some phenomenological properties of the attitude but, rather, from the commitment to the attitude itself; (3) finally, in sharing this commitment to hate with others, hatred involves a certain negative social dialectics, robustly reinforces itself and becomes entrenched as a shared habitus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Cited from Elster 2004, 225.

  2. See, e.g., Allport 1954; Brewer 1999; Opotow 2005; Berkowitz 2005; Chirot and McCauley 2006; Bar-Tal et al. 2007; Halperin 2015; Brudholm and Johansen Schepelern 2018; see for reviews Harrington 2004; Royzman et al. 2005; Aumer et al. 2015.

  3. I have suggested such requirements in Szanto 2015, 2018, and León et al. forthcoming.

  4. Hatred shares some of these features with Scheler’s (1919) conception of Ressentiment. Scheler views hatred, in fact, as one affective component among others (such as envy or malicious joy) of the complex sentiment of Ressentiment. I think this is essentially right. Notice, however, that Scheler does not hold that hatred is identical with Ressentiment; thus, the point that it is a sui generis attitude still holds.

  5. For reviews, see Harrington 2004; Rempel and Burris 2005; Royzman et al. 2005; Sternberg and Sternberg 2008; Halperin et al. 2009, 2012; Fischer et al. 2018.

  6. For an interesting exception from social psychology, which differentiates between “immediate hatred” as an emotion and “chronic hatred” as a sentiment, see Halperin et al. 2012, and Halperin 2016.

  7. For the few phenomenological attempts to describe the embodied dimensions or bodily comportment in hatred, see Demmerling and Landweer 2008; Meyer-Drawe 2007; Ahmed 2014; see in this connection also Steinbock (forthcoming) who suggests a phenomenological difference between ‘hate’/‘hating’ and ‘hatred’, according to whether one considers them as ‘feelings’ (hate) or ‘feeling-states’ (hatred); notice, however, that for Steinbock both lack bodily sensations.

  8. With regard to the feeling component of hatred, Aristotle (1991) is notoriously ambivalent. Compare the partly contradicting passages for example in the Politics (1312b19-1312b34), the Nikomachean Ethics (1105b19-1105b28), the Rhetorics (1354a32-1354b22) and elsewhere (e.g., 1445a30-1445b24). For a useful discussion, see Sokolon 2003, esp. 76–78.

  9. See, e.g., Halperin et al. 2012; Fischer and Giner-Sorolla 2016; Sternberg and Sternberg 2008, 74–76.

  10. For an informative essay on early phenomenological accounts of hatred, and in particular those provided by Kolnai and his predecessors, Scheler and Pfänder, see Vendrell Ferran 2018.

  11. And this is so, even if, as we shall see below, it is typically not clear what the proper intentional object, let alone affective focus, of hatred is.

  12. Surely, more argument would be needed here to support this claim; for a systematic discussion of the sense and ambiguities in which certain forms of hatred can be conceived as reactive attitudes and, in particular, for a discussion of what he calls ‘retributive reactive hatred’, see Brudholm (2010). Brudholm (2010) is the only author I am aware of who thinks that “retributive reactive hatred” is not necessarily a globalist attitude and can (just like its usual contrast-case, resentment) properly target particular actions of others (and not necessarily persons as a whole). But see also Murphy and Hampton (1988), and Elster (2004, 229–230), who discuss hatred as a “retributive emotion”. As indicated in the introduction, I contend that a proper analysis of the appropriateness of hatred in affectively responding to certain evaluative features of its object would have to proceed from a detailed analysis of hatred’s peculiar affective intentionality. If the analysis in this paper is compelling, it ought to establish that, for systematic reasons, hatred can never be an appropriate affective attitude. However, again, I cannot provide independent support for this claim here; see for the two most intriguing, diverging, views on this, Murphy (2016 and, in Murphy and Hampton 1988, esp. 88–110) and Schmid (forthcoming).

  13. For an excellent discussion of the sense in which dehumanization is and is not at play in out-group hatred and mass atrocities, see Brudholm 2010. Allport (1954, 363–364) was probably the first to identify this mechanism in terms of ‘deindividualization’; see more below.

  14. It is in this sense that Ben-Ze’ev (2000, 381) describes hatred as involving depersonalization.

  15. This is just one of the several places in Sartre’s oeuvre where he discusses hatred. Indeed, hatred figures prominently in Sartre’s early phenomenology, from his Transcendence of the Ego, where he uses hatred as an example to illustrate the general structure of the intentionality of consciousness (Sartre 1936/37, esp. 61–68), to his famous essay, Anti-Semite and the Jew (1944b); see more below.

  16. Interestingly, Scheler has a congenial view of the unfocused intentionality of Ressentiment, which he describes as ‘radiating in all possible directions’ (Irradiierung in alle möglichen Strahlen; Scheler 1919, 60) without zeroing in on a particular target; see also Hadreas 2007, 69ff.

  17. As Schmid (forthcoming) interestingly points out, though Aristotle does not explicitly distinguish between hateworthy agents as “kinds of wrongdoers” and particular morally reprehensible or hateworthy ‘acts’ of those wrongdoers (e.g., thievery), he still doesn’t construe class-directed hatred simply as stereotyping hatred, since it is due to being a kind of wrongdoer that membership in a certain (hateworthy) class is assigned, and it is not conversely the case that mere membership in a hateworthy class makes the individuals hateworthy. The same goes, according to Schmid’s insightful analysis, for Aquinas; cf. also Green 2007.

  18. In the wake of Allport’s canonical account, a steadily growing number of social psychologists have investigated group-based and intergroup hatred; see, e.g., Post 1999, 2010; Yanay 2002; Smith and Mackie 2005; Halperin et al. 2012; Halperin 2016.

  19. See for a powerful counter-narrative Mishra 2017.

  20. Salmela and von Scheve (2017, 2018) offer a convincing account to this effect. They suggest that socioeconomic insecurity, high competition and fear of losing one’s job, e.g., to immigrants or refugees, coupled with the repression of anticipated shame in the face of déclassement, is transformed by the mechanism of Ressentiment into hatred of generic Others, which includes very diverse social groups (immigrants, refugees, the unemployed, and the political and cultural elite), whose only common denominator is that they are perceived as enemies of oneself or one’s social identity.

  21. I understand ‘sharing’ here in a sense that only requires and entails the above-described negative dialectics; I cannot dwell here upon what it would (additionally) take to robustly ‘share’ affective states, or what a theory of properly speaking ‘collective hatred’ would require; see again: Szanto 2015, forthcoming, and León et al. forthcoming.

  22. This again resonates with Sartre’s view of (anti-Semitic) hatred as a form of “passion”, whose characteristic is that “it precedes the facts that are supposed to call it forth” and, instead, “seeks them out to nourish itself upon them” (Sartre 1944b, 11).

  23. To avoid misunderstandings, my notion of ‘shared commitment’ should not be confused with Gilbert’s technical conception of joint commitments (e.g., Gilbert 2014), which is normatively and social-ontologically more demanding; I discuss that elsewhere (Szanto 2015, forthcoming).

  24. Historical evidence also corroborates this observation; take, for instance the persistence of stereotypical stigmatization of—factually already inexistent—ethnic- and class-minorities in the wake of homogenization processes enforced by Communist regimes in the Central Eastern European Danube-region; see Ther 2014, 171.

References

  • Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D. J., & Sanford, R. N. (1950). The authoritarian personality. New York: Harper & Brothers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed, S. (2014). The cultural politics of emotions. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alford, F. C. (2005). Hate is the imitation of love. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The psychology of hate (pp. 235–254). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aquinas, T. St. (1991). Summa Theologiæ. A concise translation, ed. by T. McDermott. London: Methuen.

  • Aristotle (1991). The Complete Works of Aristotle. Vols. 1 & 2. The Revised Oxford Translation, ed. by J. Barnes. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

  • Aumer, K., Bahn, A. C. K., & Harris, S. (2015). Through the looking glass, darkly: Perceptions of hate in interpersonal relationships. Journal of Relationships Research, 6(e3), 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aumer-Ryan, K., & Hatfield, E. C. (2007). The Design of Everyday Hate: A qualitative and quantitative analysis. Interpersona, 1(2), 143–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Tal, D., Halperin, E., & De Rivera, J. (2007). Collective emotions in conflict situations: Societal implications. Journal of Social Issues, 63(2), 441–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Tal, D., Chernyak-Hai, L., Schori, N., & Gundar, A. (2009). A sense of self-perceived collective victimhood in intractable conflicts. International Review of the Red Cross, 91(874), 229–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, M. (2011). Globalist attitudes and the fittingness objection. The Philosophical Quarterly, 61(244), 449–472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Ze’ev, A. (2000). The subtlety of emotions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz, L. (2005). On hate and its determinants: Some affective and cognitive influences. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The psychology of hate (pp. 155–183). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1980) [1990]. The logic of practice. Transl. R. Nice. Cambridge: Polity.

  • Brewer, M. B. (1999). The psychology of prejudice: Ingroup love and outgroup hate? Journal of Social Issues, 55(3), 429–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, M. B. (2000). Superordinate goals versus superordinate identity as bases of intergroup cooperation. In D. Capozza & R. Brown (Eds.), Social identity processes: Trends in theory and research (pp. 117–132). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brudholm, T. (2010). Hatred as an attitude. Philosophical Papers, 39(3), 289–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brudholm, T., and Johansen Schepelern, B. (2018). Pondering hatred. In T. Brudholm & Lang, J. (eds.). (2018). Emotions and Mass Atrocity: Philosophical and Theoretical Explorations, (pp. 81–103). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Brudholm, T., & Lang, J. (2018). Introduction: Emotions and mass atrocity. In T. Brudholm & J. Lang (Eds.), Emotions and mass atrocity: Philosophical and theoretical explorations (pp. 1–20). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chavez, L. R. (2001). Covering immigration: Popular images and the politics of the nation. University of California Press.

  • Chirot, D., & McCauley, C. (2006). Why not kill them all? The logic and prevention of mass political murder. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Sousa, R. (1987). The rationality of emotions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demmerling, C., & Landweer, H. (2008). Philosophie der Gefühle: Von Achtung bis Zorn. Stuttgart: Metzler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duckitt, J., & Mphuthing, T. (1998). Group identification and intergroup attitudes: A longitudinal analysis in South Africa. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(1), 80–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster, J. (2004). Closing the books: Transitional justice in historical perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, A., & Giner-Sorolla, R. (2016). Contempt: Derogating others while keeping calm. Emotion Review, 8(4), 346–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, A., Halperin, E., Canetti, D., and Jasini, A. (2018). Why we hate. Emotion Review. https://doi.org/10.1177/17540739177.

  • Frijda, N. H. (2007). The laws of emotion. New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gay, P. (1993). The cultivation of hatred. New York: W.W. Norton & Co..

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaylin, W. (2003). Hatred: The psychological descent into violence. New York: Public Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, M. (2014). Joint commitment: How we make the social world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldie, P. (2000). The emotions. A philosophical exploration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, K. (2007). Aquinas on attachment, envy, and hatred in the Summa Theologica. Journal of Religious Ethics, 35(3), 403–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadreas, P. (2007). A phenomenology of love and hate. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halperin, E. (2016). Emotions in conflict: Inhibitors and facilitators of peace making. Routledge.

  • Halperin, E., Canetti-Nisim, D., & Hirsch-Hoefler, S. (2009). The central role of group-based hatred as an emotional antecedent of political intolerance: Evidence from Israel. Political Psychology, 30(1), 93–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halperin, E., Canetti, D., & Kimhi, S. (2012). Love with hatred: Rethinking the role hatred plays in shaping political behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42(9), 2231–2256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, R. (1995). One for all. The logic of group conflict. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrington, E. R. (2004). The social psychology of hatred. Journal of Hate Studies, 3(49), 49–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haslam, N. (2006). Dehumanization: An integrative review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(3), 252–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helm, B. W. (2001). Emotional reason: Deliberation, motivation, and the nature of value. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helm, B. W. (2009). Emotions as evaluative feelings. Emotion Review, 1(3), 248–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helm, B. W. (2017). Communities of respect. Grounding responsibility, authority, and dignity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, S. M., & Castañeda, H. (2016). Representing the “European refugee crisis” in Germany and beyond: Deservingness and difference, life and death. American Ethnologist, 43(1), 12–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hugenberg, K., Miller, J., & Claypool, H. M. (2007). Categorization and individuation in the cross-race recognition deficit: Toward a solution to an insidious problem. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43(2), 334–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, E. (1901) [1984]. Logische Untersuchungen IV. Husserliana XIX/1, ed. Ursula Panzer. Den Haag: Nijhoff 1984.

  • Husserl, E. (1920/1924) [2004]. Einleitung in die Ethik. Vorlesungen Sommersemester 1920/1924, Husserliana XXXVII, ed. Henning Peucker. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

  • Kenny, A. K. (1963). Action, emotion and will. London: Routledge and Keagan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolnai, A. (1935). [2007]. Ekel, Hochmut, Haß: Zur Phänomenologie feindlicher Gefühle. Berlin: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolnai, A. (1998). The standard modes of aversion: Fear, disgust and hatred. Mind, 107(427), 581–595.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landweer, H. (forthcoming). Affects of aggression: Indignation, envy, anger, jealousy, contempt and hatred. In T. Szanto, and H. Landweer (eds.). The Routledge Handbook of Phenomenology of Emotions. London, New York: Routledge.

  • León, F., Szanto, T., & Zahavi, D. (forthcoming). Emotional sharing and the extended mind. Synthese. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1351-x.

  • Mason, M. (2003). Contempt as a moral attitude. Ethics, 113(2), 234–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer-Drawe, K. (2007). Ablehnung des Leibes. Ekel und Haß. In R. Konersmann (ed.). Das Leben denken – die Kultur denken. (pp. 110–127). Freiburg i.B.: Alber.

  • Mishra, P. (2017). The age of anger. A history of the present. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulligan, K. (2017). Thrills, orgasms, sadness, and hysteria. In A. Cohen & R. Stern (Eds.), Thinking about the emotions: A philosophical history (pp. 223–252). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, J. G. (2016). A word on behalf of good haters. The Hedgehog Review, 18(2), 90–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, J. G., & Hampton, J. (1988). Forgiveness and mercy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nozick, R. (1989). Examined life: Philosophical meditations. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. C. (2016). Anger and forgiveness: Resentment, generosity, and justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Opotow, S. (2005). Hate, Conflict, and Moral Exclusion. In R. J. Sternberg (ed.). The Psychology of Hate (pp. 121–153). Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association.

  • Post, J. M. (1999). The psychopolitics of hatred: Commentary on Ervin Staub’s article. Peace and Conflict, 5(4), 337–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Post, J. M. (2010). “When hatred is bred in the bone:” the social psychology of terrorism. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1208(1), 15–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranstorp, M. (2013). ‘Lone wolf terrorism’. The case of Anders Breivik. Sicherheit und Frieden/Security and Peace, 31(2), 87–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rempel, J. K., & Burris, C. T. (2005). Let me count the ways: An integrative theory of love and hate. Personal Relationships, 12(2), 297–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, R. C. (2003). Emotions. An essay in aid of moral psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Royzman, E. B., McCauley, C., & Rozin, P. (2005). From Plato to Putnam: Four ways to think about hate. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The psychology of hate (pp. 3–36). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmela, M., & von Scheve, C. (2017). Emotional roots of right-wing political populism. Social Science Information, 56(4), 567–595.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmela, M., & von Scheve, C. (2018). Emotional dynamics of right- and left-wing political populism. Humanity and Society, 42, 434–454. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160597618802521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sartre, J.-P. (1936/37) [1991]. The Transcendence of the Ego. An Existentialist Theory of Consciousness. Transl. F. Williams, and R. Kirkpatrick. New York: Hill and Wang.

  • Sartre, J.-P. (1944a) [2003]. Being and Nothingness. An Essay on Phenomenological Ontology. Transl. H. E. Barnes. London: Routledge.

  • Sartre, J.-P. (1944b) [1976]. Anti-Semite and Jew. An Exploration of the Etiology of Hatred. Transl. G. J. Becker. New York: Schocken.

  • Scheler, M. (1919) [1955]. Ressentiment im Aufbau der Moralen. In M. Scheler: Vom Umsturz der Werte: Abhandlungen und Aufsätze. Gesammelte Werke 3. Bonn: Bouvier.

  • Schmid, H. B. (forthcoming). Hatred of evil. In T. Szanto, and H. Landweer (eds.). The Routledge Handbook of Phenomenology of Emotions. London, New York: Routledge.

  • Smith, E. R., & Mackie, D. M. (2005). Aggression, hatred, and other emotions. In J. F. Dovidio, P. Glick, & L. A. Rudman (Eds.), On the nature of prejudice: Fifty years after Allport (pp. 361–376). Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokolon, M. K. (2003). Political Emotions: Aristotle and the Symphony of Reason and Emotion. DeKalb, ill. Northern Illinois University Press.

  • Solomon, R. C. (1993) The Passions. Emotions and the Meaning of Life. Indianapolis: Hackett.

  • Solomon, R. C. (1995). A passion for justice: Emotions and the origins of the social contract. Rowman & Littlefield.

  • Steinbock, A. J. (forthcoming). Hating as contrary to loving. The New Yearbook for Phenomenology and Phenomenological Philosophy.

  • Sternberg, R. J., and Sternberg, K. (2008). The nature of hate. Cambridge University Press.

  • Strawson, P. F. (1962). Freedom and resentment. Proceedings of the British Academy, 48, 187–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szanto, T. (2015). Collective emotions, normativity and empathy: A Steinian account. Human Studies38(4), 503–527.

  • Szanto, T. (2017). Collective imagination: A normative account. In T. Fuchs, L. Vanzago, and M. Summa (Eds.), Imagination and social Perspectives: Approaches from phenomenology and psychopathology (pp. 223–245). London, New York: Routledge.

  • Szanto, T. (2018). The phenomenology of shared emotions: Reassessing Gerda Walther. In S. Luft, & R. Hagengruber (Eds.), Women Phenomenologists on Social Ontology (pp. 85–104). Dordrecht: Springer.

  • Ther, P. (2014). The Dark Side of Nation-States: Ethnic Cleansing in Modern Europe. Transl. C. Kreutzmüller. New York, Oxford: Berghahn Books.

  • Vendrell Ferran, Í. (2018). Phenomenological approaches to hatred: Scheler, Pfänder, and Kolnai. The New Yearbook for Phenomenology and Phenomenological Philosophy, 16, 158–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yanay, N. (2002). Understanding collective hatred. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 2(1), 53–60.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Earlier versions of this paper were presented at conferences in Montreal, Lund, Athens, Salt Lake City, Den Haag and Hagen. I have received numerous helpful suggestions on these occasions from various audiences, for which I am very grateful. I am especially indebted to Thomas Brudholm, Mikko Salmela and Carina Staal, who have read and commented the penultimate manuscript, and to two anonymous reviewers for their thorough and constructive criticism. Work on this paper was generously supported by Sara Heinämaa's (PI) Academy of Finland research project Marginalization and Experience: Phenomenological Analyses of Normality and Abnormality (MEPA).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Szanto.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Szanto, T. In hate we trust: The collectivization and habitualization of hatred. Phenom Cogn Sci 19, 453–480 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-018-9604-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-018-9604-9

Keywords

Navigation