Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Squaring the Circle: Addiction, Disease and Learning

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Neuroethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Letter to this article was published on 01 April 2017

Abstract

The history of ideas about addiction often comes down to a history of debates over the use and meaning of language (Levine et al. Journal of Studies on Alcohol 15:493–506, 1978). Nowhere is this more clear than in the interminable “Is addiction a ‘disease’?” debate. In Marc Lewis’ excellent Biology of Desire and in his paper that centers this issue, there is far more agreement between his work and mine than there is disagreement on the “disease” question. Here, however, I make a case for greater compatibility between the “disease” view and learning models of addiction than Lewis does, because I think the nuance is worth exploring. Indeed, if addiction science and ethics paid more attention to nuance in general, the whole field would be far better off.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Peele, S. and Brodsky. (1975). A. Love and Addiction. Taplinger Publishing.

  2. National Institute on Drug Abuse. The Science of Drug Abuse and Addiction: The Basics. Accessed 9/29/16 at https://www.drugabuse.gov/publications/media-guide/science-drug-abuse-addiction-basics.

  3. Burkett, J.P., and L.J. Young. 2012. The behavioral, anatomical and pharmacological parallels between social attachment, love and addiction. Psychopharmacology 224(1): 1–26. doi:10.1007/s00213-012-2794-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Center for the Study of Addiction and Substance Abuse. (2011). Adolescent Substance Use: America’s #1 Public Health Problem.

  5. Kalivas, P.W., N. Volkow, and J. Seamans. 2005. Unmanageable motivation in addiction: a pathology in prefrontal-accumbens glutamate transmission. Neuron 45: 647–650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cécile Denis, Mélina Fatséas, Virginie Beltran, Claire Bonnet, Stéphane Picard, Isabelle Combourieu, Jean-Pierre Daulouède, and Marc Auriacombe. (2012). Validity of the Self-Reported Drug Use Section of the Addiction Severity Index and Associated Factors Used under Naturalistic Conditions. Substance Use & Misuse 47:(4).

  7. Martin, M.S., G. Eljdupovic, K. McKenzie, and I. Colman. 2015. Risk of violence by inmates with childhood trauma and mental health needs. Law and Human Behavior 39(6): 614–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Maremmani, A.G., F. Rugani, S. Bacciardi, L. Rovai, M. Pacini, L. Dell’Osso, and I. Maremmani. 2014. Does dual diagnosis affect violence and moderate/superficial self-harm in heroin addiction at treatment entry? Journal of Addiction Medicine 8(2): 116–122. doi:10.1097/ADM.0000000000000019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Arola, R., et al. 2016. Borderline personality disorder associates with violent criminality in women: a population based follow-up study of adolescent psychiatric inpatients in Northern Finland. Forensic Science International 266: 389–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Pescosolido, B.A., J.K. Martin, J.S. Long, T.R. Medina, J.C. Phelan, and B.G. Link. 2010. “A disease like any other”? A decade of change in public reactions to schizophrenia, depression, and alcohol dependence. The American Journal of Psychiatry 167(11): 1321–1330. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2010.09121743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Phillips, L.A., and A. Shaw. 2013. Substance use more stigmatized than smoking and obesity. Journal of Substance Use 18(4): 247–253. doi:10.3109/14659891.2012.661516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. White, W., and W. Miller. 2007. The use of confrontation in addiction treatment: history, science and time for change. Counselor 8(4): 12–30.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Silberman, Steve. Our Neurodiverse World. Slate. 9/23/2105. Accessed 9/2916 at: http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/science/2015/09/the_neurodiversity_movement_autism_is_a_minority_group_neurotribes_excerpt.html.

  14. Compton, W.M., Y.F. Thomas, F.S. Stinson, and B.F. Grant. 2007. Prevalence, correlates, disability, and comorbidity of DSM-IV drug abuse and dependence in the United States: results from the national epidemiologic survey on alcohol and related conditions. Archives of General Psychiatry 64(5): 566–576. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.64.5.566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Heyman, G.M. 2013. Addiction and choice: theory and new data. Frontiers in Psychiatry 4: 31. doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2013.00031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fletcher, A.M. 2013. Inside Rehab, 219. New York: Viking Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Levine, Harry G, “The Discovery of Addiction: Changing Conceptions of Habitual Drunkenness in America” Journal of Studies on Alcohol. 1978; 15: 493–506. See especially, appendix on definitions. See also: O’Brien CP, Volkow N, Li TK. “What’s in a Word? Addiction Versus Dependence in DSM-V.” American Journal of Psychiatry, 163(5), pp. 764–765.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maia Szalavitz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Szalavitz, M. Squaring the Circle: Addiction, Disease and Learning. Neuroethics 10, 83–86 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-016-9288-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-016-9288-1

Keywords

Navigation