References
Bennett, J., Hogarth, S., & Lubben, F. (2003). A systematic review of the effects of context-based and Science-Technology-Society (STS) approaches in the teaching of secondary science: Review conducted by the TTA-supported Science Review Group. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London.
Bickhard, M. H. (1998). Constructivism and relativism: A shoppers guide. In M. R. Matthews (Ed.), Constructivism in science education: A philosophical examination (pp. 99–112). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers
Biddle, B. J., & Anderson, D. S. (1986). Theory, methods, knowledge and research on teaching. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 230–252). New York: Macmillan.
Bodner, G. M., & Orgill, M. (Eds.). (2007). Theoretical frameworks for research in chemistry/science education. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research methods in education (7th ed.). London: Routledge.
Gilbert, J. K., & Watts, D. M. (1983). Concepts, misconceptions and alternative conceptions: Changing perspectives in science education. Studies in Science Education, 10, 61–98.
Grandy, R. E. (1998). Constructivisms and objectivity: Disentangling metaphysics from pedagogy. In M. R. Matthews (Ed.), Constructivism in science education: A philosophical examination (pp. 113–123). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Marton, F., & Pang, M. F. (2008). The idea of phenomenography and the pedagogy of conceptual change. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 533–559). New York: Routledge.
National Research Council Committee on Scientific Principles for Educational Research. (2002). Scientific research in education. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Oancea, A. (2005). Criticisms of educational research: Key topics and levels of analysis. British Educational Research Journal, 31(2), 157–183.
Phillips, D. C. (2005). The contested nature of empirical educational research (and why philosophy of education offers little help). Journal of Philosophy of Education, 39(4), 577–597.
Piantanida, M., & Garman, N. B. (2009). The qualitative dissertation: A guide for students and faculty (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: Corwin Press.
Pring, R. (2000a). The ‘false dualism’ of educational research. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 34(2), 247–260. doi:10.1111/1467-9752.00171.
Pring, R. (2000b). Philosophy of educational research. London: Continuum.
Schmidt, H.-J. (1991). A label as a hidden persuader: Chemists’ neutralization concept. International Journal of Science Education, 13(4), 459–471.
Taber, K. S. (1998). An alternative conceptual framework from chemistry education. International Journal of Science Education, 20(5), 597–608.
Taber, K. S. (2007a). Classroom-based research and evidence-based practice: A guide for teachers. London: SAGE.
Taber, K. S. (2007b). Science education for gifted learners? In K. S. Taber (Ed.), Science education for gifted learners (pp. 1–14). London: Routledge.
Taber, K. S. (2009). Progressing science education: Constructing the scientific research programme into the contingent nature of learning science. Dordrecht: Springer.
Taber, K. S. (2010). Straw men and false dichotomies: Overcoming philosophical confusion in chemical education. Journal of Chemical Education, 87(5), 552–558. doi:10.1021/ed8001623.
Windelbrand, W. (1894/1980). History and Natural Science: Rectorial address, Strassbourg. History and Theory, 19(2):169–185.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Taber, K.S. Ken Springer: Educational Research: A Contextual Approach . Sci & Educ 22, 1267–1279 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-011-9420-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-011-9420-x