Abstract
This article discusses the work ofGeorge Udny Yule in relation to theevolutionary synthesis and thebiometric-Mendelian debate. It has generallybeen claimed that (i.) in 1902, Yule put forththe first account showing that the competingbiometric and Mendelian programs could besynthesized. Furthermore, (ii.) the scientificfigures who should have been most interested inthis thesis (the biometricians W. F. RaphaelWeldon and Karl Pearson, and the MendelianWilliam Bateson) were too blinded by personalanimosity towards each other to appreciateYule's proposal. This essay provides adetailed account of (i.), maintaining thatYule's 1902 proposal is better understood as areduction, not a synthesis of the two programs.The results of this analysis are then used toevaluate (ii.), where I will instead argue thatBateson and the biometricians had good reasonsto avoid endorsing Yule's account.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ankeny, Rachel. A. 2000. “Marvelling at the Marvel: The Supposed Conversion of A.D. Darbishire to Mendelism.” Journal of the History of Biology 33: 315-347.
Bateson,William. 1886. “The Ancestry of the Chordates.” Quarterly Journal of Microscopical Science 26: 539-540.
— 1894. Materials for the Study of Variation, with Treated with Especial Regard to Discontinuity in the Origin of Species. London: Macmillan Press.
— 1895. “The Origin of the Cultivated Cineraria.” Nature 51: 605.
— 1901. “Experiments in Plant Hybridization.” R.C. Punnett (ed.), The Scientific Papers of William Bateson, v. II, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1-3.
— 1902a. “The Facts of Heredity in the Light of Mendel's Discovery.” R.C. Punnett (ed.), The Scientific Papers of William Bateson, v. II, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 29-68.
—1902b. “Note on the Resolution of Compound Characters by Cross-Breeding.” R.C. Punnett (ed.), The Scientific Papers of William Bateson, v. II, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 69-73.
— 1902c. Mendel's Principles of Heredity, a Defense. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press — 1909. Mendel's Principles of Heredity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
— 1923. “Genetics of Primula Sinensis.” R.C. Punnett (ed.), The Scientific Papers of William Bateson, v. II, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 335-371.
Bennett, J.H. 1983. Natural Selection, Heredity, and Eugenics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Cock, A.G. 1973. “William Bateson, Mendelism, and Biometry.” Journal of the History of Biology 6: 1-36.
Darden, Lindley. 1977. “William Bateson and the Promise of Mendelism.” Journal of the History of Biology 10: 87-106.
East, Edward. 1910. “A Mendelian Interpretation of Variation That is Apparently Continuous.” American Naturalist 44: 65-82.
Editorial. 1902. The New Phytologist 1: 1-3.
Falk, Raphael. 1991. “The Dominance of Traits in Genetic Analysis.” Journal of the History of Biology 24: 457-484.
Farrall, Lyndsay. 1975. “Controversy and Conflict in Science: A Case Study-The English Biometric School and Mendel's Laws.” Social Studies of Science 5: 269-301.
Fisher, Ronald A. 1918. “The Correlation between Relatives on the Supposition of Mendelian Inheritance.” Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 52: 399-433.
Froggatt, P. and Nevin, N.C. 1971. “The 'Law of Ancestral Heredity' and the Mendelian-Ancestrian Controversy in England, 1889-1906.” Journal of Medical Genetics 8: 1-36.
Galton, Francis. 1897. “The Average Contribution of Each Several Ancestor to the Total Heritage of the Offspring.” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London 61: 401-413.
— 1889. Natural Inheritance. London: Macmillan.
Hull, David. 1985. “Darwinism as a Historical Entity: A Historiographic Proposal.” David Kohn (ed.), The Darwinian Heritage, Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 773-812.
Huxley, Julian. 1942. Evolution: The Modern Synthesis. London: Allen and Unwin.
Johannsen, Wilhelm L. 1903. “Concerning Heredity in Populations and in Pure Lines.” Selected Readings in Biology for Natural Sciencesv3. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1955.
Kendall, Maurice G. 1971. Statistical Papers of George Udny Yule. London: Griffin.
Kevles, Daniel. 1981. “Genetics in the United States and Great Britain 1890-1930: A Review with Speculations.” C. Webster (ed.), Biology, Medicine, and Society 1840-1940, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 193-216.
Kim, Kyung-Man. 1994. Explaining Scientific Consensus: The Case of Mendelian Genetics. New York: Guilford Press.
Mackenzie, Donald. 1981. “Sociobiologists in Competition: The Biometry-Mendelism Controversy.” C. Webster (ed.), Biology, Medicine, and Society 1840-1940. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 243-288.
Mackenzie, Donald and Barnes, Barry. 1974. “Historical and Sociological Analyses of Scientific Change: The Case of the Mendelian-Biometrician Controversy in England.” Unpublished Manuscript.
— 1979. “Scientific Judgement: The Biometrician-Mendelism Controversy.” B. Barnes and S. Shapin (eds.), Natural Order: Historical Studies of Scientific Change, London: Sage, pp. 191-210.
Mather, K. 1941. “Variation and Selection of Polygenic Characters.” Journal of Genetics 41: 159.
Mayr, Ernst. 1973. “The Recent Historiography of Genetics.” Journal of the History of Biology 6: 125-154.
Mayr, Ernst and Provine, William. 1980. The Evolutionary Synthesis: Perspectives on the Unification of Biology. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Morrison, Margaret. 2002. “Modelling Populations: Pearson and Fisher on Mendelism and Biometry.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 53: 39-68.
Nilsson-Ehle, Nils Hermann. 1909. “Kreuzungsuntersuchungen an Hafer und Weizen.” Lunds Univ. Årsskrift n.s., series 2, 5(2): 1-122.
Norton, B.J. 1973. “The Biometric Defense of Darwinism.” Journal of the History of Biology 6: 283-316.
— 1975. “Biology and Philosophy: The Methodological Foundations of Biometry.” Journal of the History of Biology 8: 85-93.
Olby, Robert. 1988. “The Dimensions of Scientific Controversy: The Biometric-Mendelian Debate.” British Journal for the History of Science 22: 299-320.
Pearson, Karl. 1900. The Grammar of Science, 2nd ed. London: A. and C. Black Publishing Co.
—1903. “The Law of Ancestral Heredity.” Biometrika 2: 211-236.
— 1904. “Mathematical Contributions to the Theory of Evolution. XII. On a Generalised Theory of Alternative Inheritance, with Special Reference to Mendel's Laws.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series A 203: 53-86.
— 1907. “On the Theory of Inheritance of Quantitative Compound Characters on the Basis of Mendel's Laws, by G.U. Yule: A Review.” Biometrika 5: 481-482.
Provine, William B. 1971. The Origins of Theoretical Population Genetics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Richmond, Marsha L. 2001. “Women in the Early History of Genetics: William Bateson and the Newnham College Mendelians, 1900-1910.” Isis 22: 55-90.
Roll-Hansen, Nils. 1980. “The Controversy between Biometricians and Mendelians: A Test Case for the Sociology of Scientific Knowledge.” Social Science Information 19: 501-517.
Sarkar, Sahotra. 1998. Genetics and Reductionism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Shapere, Dudley. 1980. “The Meaning of the Evolutionary Synthesis.” The Evolutionary Synthesis: Perspectives on the Unification of Biology. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Thistleton-Dyer, SirWilliam Turner. 1895. “Origin of the Cultivated Cineraria.” Nature 52: 3, 78, 128.
Weldon, W. F. Raphael. 1890. “The Variations Occurring in Certain Decapod Crustacea I. Crangon vulgaris.” Proceedings of the Royal Society 47: 445-453.
— 1892. “Certain Correlated Variations in Crangon vulgaris.” Proceedings of the Royal Society 51: 2-21.
— 1894. “The Study of Animal Variation, a Review.” Nature 50: 25-26.
—1895. “The Origin of the Cultivated Cineraria.” Nature 52: 54.
—1902. “Mendel's Laws of Alternative Inheritance in Peas.” Biometrika 1: 228-254.
Wright, Sewall. 1978. “The Relation of Livestock Breeding to Theories of Evolution.” Journal of Animal Science 46: 1192-1200.
Yule, George U. 1902. “Mendel's Laws and Their Probable Relations to Intra-Racial Heredity.” The New Phytologist 1: 193-207, 222-238.
—1906. “On the Theory of Inheritance of Quantitative Compound Characters on the Basis ofMendel's Laws-A Preliminary Note.” Report of the Conference on Genetics: 140-142.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tabery, J.G. The ``Evolutionary Synthesis'' of George Udny Yule. Journal of the History of Biology 37, 73–101 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:HIST.0000020390.75208.ac
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:HIST.0000020390.75208.ac