Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter March 22, 2022

The Ontological Distinction between Persons and Their Bodies

  • Mohammad Reza Tahmasbi EMAIL logo
From the journal Metaphysica

Abstract

Lynne Rudder Baker’s constitution theory of persons explains the relationship between persons and their bodies. Baker’s theory can explain the ontological status of persons. However, her explanation of the distinction between persons and their bodies faces a problem. In this paper, first, I show that her account, in fact, does not amount to a real distinction between persons and their bodies. Then, by discussing the notion of ‘derivatively having property,’ I propose a notion of constitution which is compatible with the idea that persons and their bodies are, ontologically speaking, distinct entities. This notion of constitution helps us to avoid both the problem of too many minds and the problem of substance dualism.


Corresponding author: Mohammad Reza Tahmasbi, PhD, School of English & Liberal Studies, Seneca College, 1750 Finch Ave. East Toronto, North York, Ontario M2J 2X5, Canada, E-mail:

References

Baker, L. R. 1997. “Why Constitution is Not Identity.” The Journal of Philosophy 94 (12): 599–621. https://doi.org/10.2307/2564596.Search in Google Scholar

Baker, L. R. 2000. Persons and Bodies: A Constitution View. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139173124Search in Google Scholar

Baker, L. R. 2002. “Replies.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 64 (3): 623–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1933-1592.2002.tb00166.x.Search in Google Scholar

Baker, L. R. 2009. The Metaphysics of Everyday Life: An Essay in Practical Realism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Baker, L. R. 2012. “From Consciousness to Self-Consciousness.” Grazer Philosophische Studien 84: 19–38. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401207904_003.Search in Google Scholar

Baker, L. R. 2015. “Human Persons as Social Entities.” Journal of Social Ontology 1 (1): 77–87. https://doi.org/10.1515/jso-2014-0037.Search in Google Scholar

Evnine, S. J. 2010. “Constitution and Composition: Three Approaches to Their Relation.” Protosociology 27: 212–35.10.5840/protosociology20112712Search in Google Scholar

Johnston, M. 1992. “Constitution is Not Identity.” Mind 101 (401): 89–105. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/101.401.89.Search in Google Scholar

Noonan, H. W. 1993. “Constitution is Identity.” Mind 102 (405): 133–46. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/102.405.133.Search in Google Scholar

Olson, E. T. 2001. “Review of persons and bodies: A Constitution View.” Mind 110: 427–30.10.1093/mind/110.438.427Search in Google Scholar

Zimmerman, D. W. 2002. “The Constitution of Persons by Bodies: A Critique of Lynne Rudder Baker’s Theory of Material Constitution.” Philosophical Topics 30 (1): 295–338. https://doi.org/10.5840/philtopics200230111.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2021-05-07
Accepted: 2021-11-07
Published Online: 2022-03-22
Published in Print: 2022-09-26

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 17.5.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/mp-2021-0018/html
Scroll to top button