Abstract
This chapter provides the rationale for applying a systems approach to language pedagogy; presents a case study in which soft systems methodology (SSM), a type of soft systems approach, was applied to language curriculum development; and attempts to manage language teaching research from a communicative perspective. In doing so, it argues that language pedagogy is a complex phenomenon in which various factors affect one another in complex ways. By referring to language teaching research that investigates the nature of the factors of language pedagogy, it also argues that due to lack of communication among the research areas in the field, each of the discrete research topics has been discussed individually within the confines of those research areas, often resulting in the so-called silo effect.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
The silo effect is a term used in business that describes a lack of communication between different sectors. In essence, when the effect occurs, individuals are isolated within their own silos, and thus cooperation is hampered.
References
Atkinson, C., Eldabi, T., & Paul, R. (2002). Integrated approaches to health informatics research and development. Logistics Information Management, 15, 138–152.
Chambers, F. (1997). Seeking consensus in coursebook evaluation. ELT Journal, 51(1), 29–35.
Checkland, P. (1981). Systems thinking, systems practice. Chichester: Wiley.
Checkland, P. (1983). OR and the systems movement: Mapping and conflicts. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 34, 661–675.
Checkland, P. (2001). Soft systems methodology in action: Participative creation of an information strategy for an acute hospital. In J. Rosenbhead & J. Mingers (Eds.), Rational analysis for a problematic world revisited: Problem structuring methods for complexity, uncertainty and conflict (pp. 91–113). Chichester: Wiley.
Checkland, P., & Poulter, J. (2006). Learning for action: A short definitive account of soft systems methodology and its use for practitioners, teachers and students. Chichester: Wiley.
Checkland, P., & Scholes, J. (1990). Soft systems methodology in action. Chichester: Wiley.
Churchman, C. W. (1968). The systems approach. New York: Delacorte Press.
Connell, N. (2001). Evaluating soft OR: Some reflections on an apparently unsuccessful implementation using a soft systems methodology (SSM) based approach. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 52(2), 150–160.
Ferrari, M., Fares, B., & Martinelli, P. (2002). The systemic approach of SSM: The case of a Brazilian company. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 15, 51–66.
Hasan, R. (1988). The analysis of one poem: Theoretical issues in practice. In D. Birch & M. O’Tool (Eds.), Functions and styles (pp. 45–73). London: Edward Arnold.
Holliday, A. (1990). A role for soft systems methodology in ELT projects. System, 18, 77–84.
Johnson, K., & Johnson, H. (Eds.). (1999). The encyclopedic dictionary of applied linguistics: A handbook for language teaching. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Katsurayama, K., Takahashi, S., Kanamaru, T., Sasao, Y., Stewart, T., Dalsky, D., & Tajino, A. (2018). Kyoto daigaku ni okeru eigo kyouiku kaikaku—Eigo raiting-risuningu kousu ni shouten wo atete [English education reform at Kyoto University: A focus on the English writing–listening course]. Kyoto University Institute for Liberal Arts and Sciences Bulletin, 1, 111–121.
Luckett, S., Ngubane, S., & Memela, B. (2001). Designing a management system for a rural community development organization using a systemic action research process. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 14, 517–542.
Meadows, D. H. (2008). Thinking in systems. White River Junction: Chelsea Green Publishing.
Tajino, A. (2002). Transformation process models: A systemic approach to problematic team-teaching situations. Prospect, 17, 29–44.
Tajino, A., & Suiko, M. (2005). Daigaku eigokyoiku eno teigen—Karikyuramu kaihatsu eno sisutemu apurochi [A proposal for university English language education: A systems approach to curriculum development]. In Y. Takefuta & M. Suiko (Eds.), Korekarano daigaku eigokyoiku [The future of university English language education] (pp. 1–46). Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.
Tajino, A., James, R., & Kijima, K. (2005). Beyond needs analysis: Soft systems methodology for meaningful collaboration in EAP course design. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 4, 27–42.
Tett, G. (2015). The silo effect: The peril of expertise and the promise of breaking down barriers. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tajino, A., Smith, C., Kanamaru, T. (2019). Toward Managing Language Pedagogy and Language Teaching Research. In: Tajino, A. (eds) A Systems Approach to Language Pedagogy. Translational Systems Sciences, vol 17. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6272-9_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6272-9_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-6271-2
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-6272-9
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)