Skip to main content
Log in

More than Two Quantifiers*

  • Published:
Natural Language Semantics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Comparative quantifiers, such as more than three books, cannot take scope over any quantifier in subject position if they occupy object position. This is clearly different from the behavior of other quantifiers (e.g., universal quantifiers). This paper argues that this scope puzzle is due to a more complex internal structure of comparative quantifiers than other quantifiers. In the decompositional approach that I pursue, comparative quantifiers are decomposed into two generalized quantifiers (i.e., in the case above, the comparative operator er than three and the DP many books). In this approach, obligatory narrow scope of comparative quantifiers in object position is a consequence of the interplay of the independently motivated principles of grammar that also constrain other quantifiers. On the basis of the scope puzzle, I specifically argue for two constraints on Scope Shifting Operations (SSOs) a locality condition on SSOs and Scope Economy, proposed by Fox (2000), which prohibits SSOs that have no effect on semantic interpretation. Thus, I argue that the apparently peculiar facts of comparative quantifiers are, in fact, additional evidence for the core properties of SSOs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • J. Aoun Y.-h. A. Li (1989) ArticleTitle‘Scope and Constituency’ Linguistic Inquiry 20 141–172

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Barwise R. Cooper (1981) ArticleTitle‘Generalized Quantifiers and Natural Language’ Linguistics and Philosophy 4 159–219 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00350139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S. Beck (1996) ArticleTitle‘Quantified Structures as Barriers for LF Movement’ Natural Language Semantics 4 1–56 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00263536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, S.: 1996b, Wh-constructions and Transparent Logical Form, PhD dissertation, Universität Tübingen

  • S. Beck (1997) ArticleTitle‘On the Semantics of Comparative Conditionals’ Linguistics and Philosophy 20 229–271 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1005361901518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beghelli, F.: 1995, The Phrase Structure of Quantifier Scope, PhD dissertation, UCLA

  • F. Beghelli T. Stowell (1997) ‘Distributivity and Negation: The Syntax of Each and Every’ A. Szabolcsi (Eds) Ways of Scope Taking Kluwer Dordrecht 71–107

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Bhatt R. Pancheva (2002) ArticleTitle‘Late Merger of Degree Clauses’ Linguistic Inquiry 35 1–45

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Bresnan (1973) ArticleTitle‘Syntax of the Comparative Clause Construction in English’ Linguistic Inquiry 4 275–343

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Bruening (2001) ArticleTitle‘QR Obeys Superiority: Frozen Scope and ACD’ Linguistic Inquiry 32 233–273 Occurrence Handle10.1162/00243890152001762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • N. Chomsky (1977) ‘On Wh-movement’ P.W. Culicover T. Wasow A. Akmajian (Eds) Formal Syntax Academic Press New York 71–132

    Google Scholar 

  • N. Chomsky (1995) The Minimalist Program MIT Press Cambridge, Mass

    Google Scholar 

  • M.J. Cresswell (1976) ‘The Semantics of Degree’ B.H. Partee (Eds) Montague Grammar Academic Press New York 261–292

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Diesing (1992) Indefinites MIT Press Cambridge, Mass

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Fintel Particlevon (1993) ArticleTitle‘Exceptive Constructions’ Natural Language Semantics 1 123–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, D.: 1995, ‘Condition C Effects in ACD’, in R. Pensalfini and H. Ura (eds.), Papers on Minimalist Syntax, MITWPL 27, pp. 105–119. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, Cambridge, Mass.

  • D. Fox (2000) Economy and Semantic Interpretation MIT Press Cambridge, Mass

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Fox (2002) ArticleTitle‘Antecedent-Contained Deletion and the Copy Theory of Movement’ Linguistic Inquiry 33 63–96 Occurrence Handle10.1162/002438902317382189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hackl, M.: 2000, Comparative Quantifiers, PhD dissertation, MIT.

  • I. Heim (2001) ‘Degree Operators and Scope’ C. Féry W. Sternefeld (Eds) Audiatur Vox Sapientiae: A Festschrift for Arnim von Stechow Akademie Verlag Berlin 214–239

    Google Scholar 

  • Heim, I.: 2001b, ‘A Compositional Analysis of Less’, lecture notes, MIT

  • I. Heim A. Kratzer (1998) Semantics in Generative Grammar Blackwell Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Hellan (1981) Towards an Integrated Analysis of Comparatives Narr Tübingen

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Hirschbühler (1982) ‘VP Deletion and Across-the-Board Quantifier Scope’ J. Pustejovsky P. Sells (Eds) Proceedings of NELS 12 GLSA University of Massachusetts Amherst 132–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, K. and S. Tomioka: 1997, ‘Lowering and Mid-Size Clauses’, in G. Katz, S.-S. Kim, and H. Winhart (eds.), Reconstruction: Proceedings of the 1997 Tübingen Workshop, pp. 185–205. Universität Stuttgart and Universität Tübingen

  • C. Kennedy (1997) ArticleTitle‘Antecedent-Contained Deletion and the Syntax of Quantification’ Linguistic Inquiry 28 662–688

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Kennedy (1999) Projecting the Adjective: The Syntax and Semantics of Gradability and Comparison Garland New York

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Kennedy (2001) ArticleTitle‘Polar Opposition and the Ontology of ‘Degrees” Linguistics and Philosophy 24 33–70 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1005668525906

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • E. Klein (1982) ArticleTitle‘The Interpretation of Adjectival Comparatives’ Journal of Linguistics 18 113–136

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Kratzer (1998) ‘Scope or Pseudoscope? Are There Wide Scope Indefinites?’ S. Rothstein (Eds) Events and Grammar Kluwer Dordrecht 163–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, R.: 1987, ‘Quantifying into NP’, ms., MIT

  • R. Larson (1988a) ArticleTitle‘On the Double Object Construction’ Linguistic Inquiry 19 335–391

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Larson (1988b) ArticleTitle‘Scope and Comparatives’ Linguistics and Philosophy 11 1–26

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Larson R. May (1990) ArticleTitle‘Antecedent Containment or Vacuous Movement: Reply to Baltin’ Linguistic Inquiry 21 103–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Lui, F.-H.: 1990, Scope Dependency in English and Chinese, PhD dissertation, UCLA.

  • F.-H. Lui (1997) Scope and Specificity John Benjamins Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Marantz (1993) ‘Implications of Asymmetries in Double Object Constructions’ S.A. Mchombo (Eds) Theoretical Aspects of Bantu Grammar CSLI Publications Stanford 113–150

    Google Scholar 

  • R. May (1985) Logical Form: Its Structure and Derivation MIT Press Cambridge, Mass

    Google Scholar 

  • May, R. and A. Bale: 2002, ‘Inverse Linking’ ms., UC Irvine and McGill University.

  • Milsark, G.: 1974, Existential Sentences in English, PhD dissertation, MIT

  • Reinhart, T.: 1995, ‘Interface Strategies’, OTS Working Papers in Linguistics, TL-95-002. Universiteit Utrecht

  • T. Reinhart (1997) ArticleTitle‘Quantifier Scope: How Labor Is Divided between QR and Choice Functions’ Linguistics and Philosophy 20 335–397 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1005349801431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards, N.: 1997, What Moves Where When in Which Language?, PhD dissertation, MIT

  • R. Rodman (1976) ‘Scope Phenomena, “Movement Transformations,” and Relative Clauses’ B.H. Partee (Eds) Montague Grammar Academic Press New York 165–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Rooth, M.: 1992, ‘Ellipsis Redundancy and Reduction Redundancy’, in S. Berman and A. Hestvik (eds.), Proceedings of the Stuttgart Ellipsis Workshop, Arbeitspapiere des Sonderforschungsbereichs 340, Bericht Nr. 29, University of Stuttgart. IBM Germany, Heidelberg

  • H. Rullmann (1995) Maximality in the Semantics of Wh-constructions University of Massachusetts Amherst

    Google Scholar 

  • Sag I.: 1976, Deletion and Logical Form, PhD dissertation, MIT

  • Sauerland, U.: 2000, ‘Syntactic Economy and Quantifier Raising’, ms., Universität Tübingen

  • U. Sauerland (2003) ArticleTitle‘Intermediate Adjunction with A-movement’ Linguistic Inquiry 34 308–314

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Schwarzschild K. Wilkinson (2002) ArticleTitle‘Quantifiers in Comparatives: A Semantics of Degree Based on Intervals’ Natural Language Semantics 10 1–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Stateva, P.: 2002, How Different Are Different Degree Constructions?, PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut

  • Stateva, P.: 2004, ‘Beck Effects in the Comparative’, in C. Meier and M. Weisgerber (eds.), Proceedings of the Conference “sub8 - Sinn und Bedeutung”, pp. 283–300. Arbeitspapier Nr. 177, FB Sprachwissenschaft, Universität Konstanz

  • A. Stechow Particlevon (1984) ArticleTitle‘Comparing Semantic Theories of Comparison’ Journal of Semantics 3 1–77

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Szabolcsi (1997) ‘Strategies for Scope Taking’ A. Szabolcsi (Eds) Ways of Scope Taking Kluwer Dordrecht 109–154

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Wilder (1997) ‘Phrasal Movement in LF: De Re Readings, VP-ellipsis and Binding’ K. Kusumoto (Eds) Proceedings of NELS 27 GLSA, University of Massachusetts Amherst 425–439

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Williams (1977) ArticleTitle‘Discourse and Logical Form’ Linguistic Inquiry 8 101–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Y. Winter (1997) ArticleTitle‘Choice Functions and the Scopal Semantics of Indefinites’ Linguistics and Philosophy 20 399–467 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1005354323136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wold, D.: 1992, ‘Antecedent-Contained Deletion in Comparative Constructions’, ms., MIT.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shoichi Takahashi.

Additional information

* I have presented parts of this paper at the Ling-Lunch at MIT (November 2002), at NELS 33 at MIT (November 2002), and at a workshop at the 20th National Conference of the English Linguistic Society of Japan (November 2002). I would like to thank the audiences at these talks for their comments. I am very grateful to Danny Fox and Irene Heim for invaluable discussion and their suggestions. I would also like to thank Sigrid Beck, Noam Chomsky, Michael Glanzberg, Elena Guerzoni, Martin Hackl, Ken Hiraiwa, Sarah Hulsey, Sabine Iatridou, Christopher Kennedy, Winfried Lechner, Andrew Ira Nevins, Jon Nissenbaum, David Pesetsky, Norvin Richards, Uli Sauerland, Shogo Suzuki, and one anonymous reviewer for Natural Language Semantics for their helpful comments. I also want to thank the speakers who judged many complicated sentences. Special thanks to Pranav Anand for his detailed comments on earlier versions of this paper, which improved the paper in various respects. All remaining errors and inadequacies are my own.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Takahashi, S. More than Two Quantifiers*. Nat Lang Seman 14, 57–101 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-005-4534-9

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-005-4534-9

Keywords

Navigation