Skip to main content
Log in

Prognostic Disclosure to Dying Adolescents Against Parental Wishes: A Point-Counter Point Debate

  • Published:
HEC Forum Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An adolescent’s last moment of life is an emotionally and medically complex time. Children may grapple with understanding the things happening to them and with grief of a future lost; caregivers struggle to simultaneously balance deep sorrow, hope, and love; and healthcare providers fight to maintain sound medical and ethical decision making. Increased discussion regarding adolescent end-of-life care is needed so that clinicians may better understand how to engage in ethically based medical management during these events. This holds particularly true in situations where potentially conflicting ideas exist between clinicians and family members. We describe the case of an acutely and terminally ill adolescent who remained cognitively intact but with rapidly advancing multiple organ failure and whose parents requested that he remain uninformed of his critical illness and prognosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Funding

No funding was received to assist with the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Manuscript conception and design were undertaken by Grant Goodrich, Shelly Ozark, Joshua Arenth and Mariah Tanious. Literature search and material preparation were performed by Grant Goodrich, Shelly Ozark and Mariah Tanious. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Grant Goodrich and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. Revision and reformatting were performed by Virginia Pedigo. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mariah K. Tanious.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

Formal review and approval was waived by the Institutional Review Board of the Medical University of South Carolina in view of the retrospective nature of the case study involving a single, deidentified patient case.

Consent

Consent was not required given the anonymized nature of the vignette without identifying details or images.

Data Transparency

No primary data or materials were included in this article beyond published studies cited within the text.

Competing Interests

The authors have no competing interests (financial or non-financial) to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

1Name and select details changed to protect patient privacy.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tanious, M.K., Goodrich, G., Pedigo, V. et al. Prognostic Disclosure to Dying Adolescents Against Parental Wishes: A Point-Counter Point Debate. HEC Forum (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10730-024-09526-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10730-024-09526-5

Keywords

Navigation