Abstract
We live in societies emphasizing security and its complementary side of fear. In this work, I analyze the peripheral messages disseminated in the urban environment, whose function is that of regulating human and collective conduct through orienting specific forms of affective meaning-making. According to the perspective of Cultural Psychology of Semiotic Dynamics, affect and cognition work always together. Affect has the primacy in the relationship with the world and on top of affective distinctions we build conceptual distinctions. Thus, I describe a type of semiotic process I have called “atmos-fear,” that works through the production of empty representamen that frames meaning. The concept of “atmos-fear” could be fruitfully developed to understand phenomena of politics, communication and construction of the Other in contemporary societies, where the dialogical relationship between security and fear is at stake.
Funding statement: The administration of fear. This work was supported by Styrelsen for Forskning og Innovation, Funder Id 10.13039/501100001825, Grant Number: 2016 International Network Programme.
References
Birth, Kevin. 2006. The immanent past: Culture and psyche at the juncture of memory and history. Ethos 34(2). 169–19110.1525/eth.2006.34.2.169Search in Google Scholar
Cronick, Karen. 2002. The discourse of president George W. Bush and Osama bin Laden: A rhetorical analysis and hermeneutic interpretation. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research 3(3). http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/836 (accessed 9 June 2017).Search in Google Scholar
Ganzel, Barbara, B. J. Casey, Gary Glover, Henning U. Voss & Elise Temple. 2007. The aftermath of 9/11: Effect of intensity and recency of trauma on outcome. Emotion 7(2). 227–238.10.1037/1528-3542.7.2.227Search in Google Scholar
Hallam, Elisabeth & Jenny L. Hockey. 2001. Death, memory and material culture. Oxford: Berg.Search in Google Scholar
Lazarus, Richard S. 1999. The cognition-emotion debate: A bit of history. In Tim Dalgleish & Mick Power (eds.), Handbook of cognition and emotion, 3–19. Chichester: John Wiley.Search in Google Scholar
Lewin, Kurt. 1945. Resolving social conflicts. New York: Harper & Row.Search in Google Scholar
Lipps, Theodore. 1903. Ästhetik: Grundlegung der ästhetik. Hamburg: Voss.Search in Google Scholar
Malm, Johnatan. 2014. Unwelcome: Fifty ways churches drive away first-time visitors. Los Angeles, CA: Center for Church Communication.Search in Google Scholar
Obeyesekere, Gananath. 1990. The work of culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar
Piaget, Jean. 1962. The relation of affectivity to intelligence in the mental development of the child. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic 26(3). 129–137.Search in Google Scholar
Piaget, Jean. 1981. Intelligence and affectivity. New York: Basic.Search in Google Scholar
Reeves, Joshua. 2012. If you see something, say something: Lateral surveillance and the uses of responsibility. Surveillance & Society 10(3/4). 235–248.10.24908/ss.v10i3/4.4209Search in Google Scholar
Rommetveit, Ragnar. 1992. Outlines of a dialogically based social-cognitive approach to human cognition and communication. In A. H. Wold (ed.), The dialogical alternative, 19–44. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Skoll, Geoffrey R. 2011. Social theory of fear. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.10.26530/OAPEN_392748Search in Google Scholar
Skoll, Geoffrey R. & Maximiliano E. Korstanje. 2013. Constructing an American fear culture from red scares to terrorism. International Journal of Human Rights and Constitutional Studies 1(4). 341–364.10.1504/IJHRCS.2013.057302Search in Google Scholar
Stearns, Peter N. 2012. American fear: The causes and consequences of high anxiety. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203943816Search in Google Scholar
Tateo, L. 2016a. Fear. In V. Glaveanu & L. Tanggaard Pedersen (eds), Creativity: A new vocabulary, 43–51. London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9781137511805_6Search in Google Scholar
Tateo, L. 2016b. Toward a cogenetic cultural psychology. Culture & Psychology 22(3). 433–447.10.1177/1354067X16645297Search in Google Scholar
Tateo, L. 2017. Poetic destroyers. Vico, emerson, and the aesthetic dimension of experiencing. Culture & Psychology 23(3). 337–355.10.1177/1354067X17701270Search in Google Scholar
Valsiner, Jaan. 2007. Culture in minds and societies. New Delhi: Sage.Search in Google Scholar
Valsiner, Jaan. 2014. An invitation to cultural psychology. London: Sage.10.4135/9781473905986Search in Google Scholar
Volosinov, Valentin N. 1973. Marxism and the philosophy of language. New York: Seminar Press.Search in Google Scholar
Vygotsky, Lev S. 1987. Thinking and speech. In A. R. W. Rieber & A. S. Carton (eds.), Problems of general psychology [The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky 1], N. Minick (trans.), 39–285. New York: Plenum Press.Search in Google Scholar
Whitehouse, Ruth. 2001. A tale of two caves: The archaeology of religious experience in Mediterranean Europe. In P. F. Biehl, F. Bertemes & H. Meller (eds.), The archaeology of cult and religion, 161–167. Budapest: Archaeolingua.Search in Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna. 2005. Empirical universals of language as a basis for the study of other human universals and as a tool for exploring cross-cultural differences. Ethos 33(2). 256–291.10.1525/eth.2005.33.2.256Search in Google Scholar
© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
