Skip to main content

Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Reporting

Separate Pasts and Common Future in Integrated Reporting

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
International Dimensions of Sustainable Management

Part of the book series: CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance ((CSEG))

  • 1388 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter reviews the evaluation of definitions of financial, corporate social responsibility, and integrated reporting (IR) used over time to reveal points of understanding what quality of these reporting means. Management literature uses many terms to refer social and environmental reporting (e.g., corporate social responsibility reporting (CSRR), sustainability reporting (SR), social and environmental reporting (SER), and corporate accountability (CA)), but there is no clear distinction between these terms. First, the author summarizes definitions of CSRR, SR, SER, and CA to identify the definitional differences between the various types of reporting. Second, the author quantifies the articles published about financial, CSR, and integrated reporting in general management, accounting, and specialized journals to analyze the evaluation of reporting. Finally, the author analyzes differences in understanding what quality of reporting means and identifies opportunities to improve the quality with multi-stakeholder network.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Offenlegung nicht-finanzieller Informationen, http://ec.europa.eu/finance/company-reporting/non-financial_reporting/index_en.htm

  2. 2.

    SOMO/EPSU (12/2012) Electricity companies less transparent than claimed—multiple discrepancies found in sustainability reports, http://www.epsu.org/a/9190

  3. 3.

    Vienna University Study 12/2012, CSR-reporting.blogspot.nl http://csr-reporting.blogspot.de/2012/11/false-claims-in-sustainability-reports.html

  4. 4.

    http://www.globalcompact.de/wAssets/docs/Reporting/fortschrittsberichterstattung_von_KMUs_im_DGCN.pdf?tid_1=All

References

  • Albareda, L., & Waddock, S. (2016). Networked CSR governance: A whole network approach to meta-governance. Business & Society, 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650315624205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aupperle, K. E., Carroll, A. B., & Hatfield, J. D. (1985). An empirical examination of the relationship between corporate social responsibility and profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 28(2), 446–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bansal, P. (2005). Evolving sustainably: A longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development. Strategic Management Journal, 26(3), 197–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bebbington, J., & Thomson, I. (2007). Social and environmental accounting, auditing, and reporting: A potential source of organisational risk governance? Environ Plan C, 25(1), 38–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behnam, M., & MacLean, T. L. (2011). Where is the accountability in international accountability standards?: A decoupling perspective. Business Ethics Quarterly, 21(1), 45–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolívar, M. P. R. (2009). Evaluating corporate environmental reporting on the Internet: The utility and resource industries in Spain. Business & Society, 48(2), 179–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650307305370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, H. S., de Jong, M., & Levy, D. L. (2009b). Building institutions based on information disclosure: Lessons from GRI’s sustainability reporting. Journal of Cleaner Production, 17(6), 571–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaney, P. K., Faccio, M., & Parsley, D. (2011). The quality of accounting information in politically connected firms. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 51(1–2), 58–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2010.07.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, S., & Bouvain, P. (2009). Is corporate responsibility converging? A comparison of corporate responsibility reporting in the USA, UK, Australia, and Germany. Journal of Business Ethics, 87, 299–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiang, H., Li-Jen, H., & Shiao, C.-F. (2015). Financial reports quality and corporate social responsibility. Asian Economic and Financial Review, 5(3), 453–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chih, H. L., Shen, C. H., & Kang, F. C. (2008). Corporate social responsibility, investor protection, and earnings management: Some international evidence. Journal of Business Ethics, 79, 179–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Core, J. E., et al. (2011). When does information asymmetry affect the cost of capital? Journal of Accounting Research, 49(1), 1–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, D., & Scaletta, T. (2006). The balanced scorecard and corporate social responsibility: Aligning values for profit. FMI Journal, 17(3), 39–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deva, S. (2006). Global compact: A critique of the UN’s public-private partnership for promoting corporate citizenship. Syracuse Journal of International Law and Commerce, 34, 107–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eck, K. (2010). Transparent und glaubwürdig: Das optimale Online Reputation Management für Unternehmen (1st ed.). München: Redline Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • EU Commission. (2014). Directive 2014/95/EU of the European Parliament and the Council of 22 October 2014 amending Directive 2013/34/EU as regards disclosure of non-financial and diversity information by certain large undertakings and groups.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, M., & Stagliano, A. J. (1995). Disclosure of environmental clean-up costs: The impact of the superfund act information. Advances in Public Interest Accounting, 6, 163–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garret, J., Hoitash, R., & Prawitt, D. F. (2014). Trust and financial reporting quality. Journal of Accounting Research, 52(5), 1087–1125. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.12063

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrett, J., et al. (2012). Controls and cooperation in interactive and non interactive settings. Contemporary Accounting Research. (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  • Garriga, E., & Melé, D. (2004). Corporate social responsibility theories: Mapping the territory. Journal of Business Ethics, 53, 51–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gladwin, T. N., & Kennelly, J. J. (1995). Shifting paradigms for sustainable development: Implications for management theory and research. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 874–907.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, S. J., Shaw, J. C., & McSweeney, L. B. (1981). Accounting standards and multinational corporations. Journal of International Business Studies, 12(1), 121–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hess, D. (2007). Social reporting and new governance regulation: The prospects of achieving corporate accountability through transparency. Business Ethics Quarterly, 17(3), 453–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heuser, M. (2016). Nutzen und Grenzen von Nachhaltigkeitsratings und -berichten. Accessed June 28, 2016, from http://www.umweltdialog.de/de/csr-management/Gastbeitrag/2016/Nutzen-und-Grenzen-von-Nachhaltigkeitsratings-und-berichten.php?utm_source=CleverReach&;utm_medium=email&;utm_campaign=28-06-2016+%28Newsletter-Version+Dezember+2014%29+UmweltDialog-Newsletter+Relaunch+2014&;utm_content=Mailing_10344921

  • Huerta, M. C. (2012). Communication of corporate social responsibility in Latin American and ASEAN countries: A comparative content analysis of corporate websites of leading companies. International Journal of Research in Management, 2(1), 130–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Junior, R. M., Best, P. J., & Cotter, J. (2014). Sustainability reporting and assurance: A historical analysis on a world-wide phenomenon. Journal of Business Ethics, 120(1), 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R., & Norton, D. (1992). The balanced scorecard – Measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70, 71–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lys, T., Naughton, J. P., & Wang, C. (2015). Signaling through corporate accountability reporting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 60(1), 56–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2015.03.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. C., & Gavin, M. B. (2005). Trust in management and performance: Who minds the shop while the employees watch the boss? Academy of Management Journal, 48(5), 874–888.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montiel, I. (2008). Corporate social responsibility and corporate sustainability: Separate pasts, common futures. Organization & Environment, 21(3), 245–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026608321329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, K. B., & Montanari, J. B. (1986). Strategic management of the socially responsible firm: Integrating management and marketing theory. Academy of Management Review, 11(4), 815–827.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nikolaeva, R., & Bicho, M. (2010). The role of institutional and reputational factors in the voluntary adoption of corporate social responsibility reporting standards. Academy of Marketing Science, 39, 136–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norman, W., & MacDonald, C. (2004). Getting to the bottom of “triple bottom line”. Business Ethics Quarterly, 14(2), 243–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Painter-Morland, M. (2007). Defining accountability in network society. Business Ethics Quarterly, 17(3), 515–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pineno, C. J. (2013). Sustainability reporting by organizations: An integrated approach or a separate category within the balanced scorecard based on key drivers through a mapping strategy. Proceedings of ASBBS, 20(1), 619–633.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price Waterhouse. (1992). Accounting for environmental compliance: Crossroad of GAAP, engineering and government. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prior, H., Schwarz, A., & Güntürkün, O. (2008). Mirror-induced behaviour in Magpies: Evidence of self-recognition. PLoS Biology, 6(8), e202. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0060202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, K. H., & O’Reilly, C. A. (1974). Failures in upward communication in organizations: Three possible culprits. Academy of Management Journal, 17(2), 205–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodolfo, C. (2012). Examining CSR reporting and economic crisis a examining CSR reporting and economic crisis a study of GRI reporting companies. Asian Economic and Financial Review, 2(1), 30–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrivastava, P. (1995). Environmental technologies and competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 16, 183–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starik, M., & Rands, G. P. (1995). Weaving an integrated web: Multilevel and multisystem perspectives of ecologically sustainable organizations. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 908–935.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, I. (2015). But does sustainability need capitalism or an integrated report’ a commentary on ‘The International Integrated Reporting Council: A story of failure’ by Flower, J. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 27, 18–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, I., Grubnic, S., & Georgakopoulos, G. (2014). Exploring accounting-sustainability hybridisation in the UK public sector. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 39(6), 453–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilley, C. (2012). Corporate reporting needs new approach. Financial Management, 65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tschopp, D., & Huefner, R. J. (2015). Comparing the evolution of CSR reporting to that of financial reporting. Journal of Business Ethics, 127(3), 565–577. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2054-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuzzolino, F., & Armandi, B. R. (1981). A need-hierarchy framework for assessing corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 6(1), 21–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WCED. (1987). Our common future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D. J. (1991). Corporate social performance revisited. Academy of Management Review, 16(4), 691–718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Solovey Tatiana .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

Count of articles with declared keywords in managements journals

Specialized CSR, accounting, and management journals

Time period

Keywords

CSR reporting

Integrated reporting

Sustainability reporting

Environmental and social reporting

Corporate accountability

Quality of reporting

Total

Academy of Management Journal

1980–1999

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

2000–2014

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Academy of Management Review

1980–1999

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

2000–2014

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Brookings Papers on Economic Activity

1980–1999

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

2000–2014

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

IMF Economic Review

1980–1999

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

2000–2014

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Journal of International Business Studies

1980–1999

0

1

1

2

1

0

5

2000–2014

1

1

0

0

0

0

2

Journal of Finance

1980–1999

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

2000–2014

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Review of Financial Studies

1980–1999

0

0

0

1

0

0

1

2000–2014

0

0

0

0

0

1

1

Journal of Financial Economics

1980–1999

1

0

0

0

0

0

1

2000–2014

0

3

0

0

1

0

4

Journal of Accounting and Economics

1980–1999

0

1

0

0

0

4

5

2000–2014

0

0

0

0

0

40

40

Journal of Accounting Research

1980–1999

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

2000–2014

0

0

0

0

0

11

11

Business Ethics Quarterly

1980–1999

0

0

0

0

4

0

4

2000–2014

0

0

5

1

12

0

18

Business and Society

1980–1999

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

2000–2014

0

0

1

1

0

0

2

Journal of Business Ethics

1980–1999

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

2000–2014

4

0

4

7

0

0

15

Total

 

6

6

11

12

18

56

109

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Tatiana, S. (2019). Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Reporting. In: Schmidpeter, R., Capaldi, N., Idowu, S.O., Stürenberg Herrera, A. (eds) International Dimensions of Sustainable Management. CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04819-8_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics