Abstract
Science is a very special form of storytelling, one in which the stories told have to be testable against empirical observation. But the world is a complicated place; and, to provide a coherent account of it, scientists often find themselves obliged to join up their observable dots using untestable or as-yet-untested lines. This is a necessary part of constructing many valuable and predictive scientific scenarios; and it is perfectly good procedure as long as the assumptions involved are fully compatible with what is known and testable. But it also means that, in formulating their ideas about how the world works (or worked), scientists must remain keenly aware not only of what is and is not assumption in those complex ideas, but of how untested elements may color their beliefs. The contributions to this volume cover many interesting examples of how assumptions have affected ideas in diverse areas of the paleosciences, both practical and theoretical, and they serve together as a salutary reminder that vigilance and a willingness to rethink are always in order.
References
Arsuaga, J.-L., de Castro, J. M. B., & Carbonell, E. (Eds.) (1997). The Sima de los Huesos hominid site. Journal of Human Evolution, 33, 105–421.
Begun, D. (2015). The real planet of the apes: A new story of human origins. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Currie, A. (2019). Simplicity, one-shot hypotheses and paleobiological explanation. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40656-019-0247-0.
Eldredge, N., & Gould, S. J. (1972). Punctuated equilibria: An alternative to phyletic gradualism. In T. J. M. Schopf (Ed.), Models in Paleobiology (pp. 85–115). San Francisco: Freeman Cooper.
MacCord, K. (2019). The impacts of assumptions on theories of tooth development and evolution at the turn of the nineteenth century. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40656-019-0245-2.
Madison, P. (2019). All things bleak and bare beneath a brazen sky: Practice and place in the analysis of Australopithecus. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40656-019-0258-x.
Mayr, E. (1950). Taxonomic categories in fossil hominids. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia in Quantitative Biology,15, 109–118.
Simons, E., & Pilbeam, D. (1965). Preliminary revision of the Dryopithecinae (Pongidae, Anthropoidea). Folia Primatologica,3, 81–152.
Tattersall, I. (2009). The fossil trail: How we know what we think we know about human evolution (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
Tattersall, I. (2010). Paleontology: A brief history of life. West Consohocken: Templeton Press.
Tattersall, I. (2012). Masters of the planet: The search for our human origins. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Villmoare, B., Kimbel, W. H., Seyoum, C., Campisano, C. J., Dimaggio, E. N., Rowan, J., et al. (2015). Early Homo at 2.8 Ma from Ledi-Geraru, Afar, Ethiopia. Science,347, 1352–1355.
Wylie, C. D. (2019). The plurality of assumptions about fossils and time. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40656-019-0260-3.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tattersall, I. How assumptions shape the paleosciences. HPLS 41, 39 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40656-019-0253-2
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40656-019-0253-2