Abstract
In Portugal, research productivity is nowadays essential for the positive assessment of academics, research units and study programmes. Academic inbreeding has been highlighted in the literature as one of the factors influencing research productivity. This paper tests the hypothesis that inbreeding is detrimental for research productivity, measured through the number of publications listed in Scopus. The study resorts to a database provided by the national Agency for Assessment and Accreditation of Higher Education (A3ES), which comprises all academics teaching in all Portuguese institutions in the academic year 2015/2016. The sample selected for the analysis contains all academics with a PhD in Sociology (N=289). The study uses a special regression model for the analysis: the negative binomial logit hurdle. This was necessary given the large amount of academics with no publications or citations in Scopus, which were the dependent variables to assess research performance. The analysis provides separate results for the probability of inbred academics of having no papers/citations, and for the probability of producing more papers/citations than the non-inbred. Findings suggest that academic inbreeding, defined at the institutional level, has no negative effect on research productivity, contrary to what was expected. However, when defined at the national level, academic inbreeding is detrimental for the recognition and the impact of research: academics with a foreign PhD are more likely to have citations compared to academics who obtained their PhD in Portugal. A tendency was also noted that inbreeding might be more detrimental to research productivity in faculties of Economics than in Social Sciences and Humanities.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alipova, Olga, and Andrey Lovakov. 2018. Academic inbreeding and publication activities of Russian faculty. Tertiary Education and Management. https://doi.org/10.1080/13583883.2017.1395905.
Altbach, Philip G., Maria Yudkevich, and Laura E. Rumbley. 2015. Academic Inbreeding: Local Challenge, Global Problem. In Academic Inbreeding and Mobility in Higher Education: Global Perspectives, eds. Philip G. Altbach, Maria Yudkevich, and Laura E. Rumbley, 1–16. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Becher, Tony, and Paul Trowler. 2001. Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the cultures of disciplines. Buckingham: SRHE.
Berelson, Bernard. 1960. Graduate education in the United States. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Carayol, Nicolas, and Mireille Matt. 2006. Individual and collective determinants of academic scientists’ productivity. Information Economics and Policy 18: 55–72.
De Filippo, Daniela, Elías Sanz Casado, and Isabel Gómez. 2009. Quantitative and qualitative approaches to the study of mobility and scientific performance: A case study of a Spanish university. Research Evaluation 18(3): 191–200.
Deem, Rosemary. 2016. Recent Research Evaluations in the UK and Portugal. In Global Challenges, National Initiatives, and Institutional Responses, eds. Cláudia Sarrico et al., 159–186. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
DGEEC—Direção-Geral de Estatísticas da Educação e Ciência. 2018. Inquérito ao potencial científico e tecnológico nacional—IPCTN16. Principais indicadores de I&D nacionais. Lisboa: Direção Geral de Estatísticas da Educação e Ciência. http://www.dgeec.mec.pt/np4/206/%7B$clientServletPath%7D/?newsId=897&fileName=IPCTN16_Destaques_Resultados_Globais.pdf. Accessed May 2018.
DGEEC—Direção-Geral de Estatísticas da Educação e Ciência. 2017. Indicadores de Endogamia académica das instituições públicas de ensino universitário—2015/16. Lisboa: Direção Geral de Estatísticas da Educação e Ciência.
Fangmeng, Tian. 2016. Brain circulation, diaspora and scientific progress: A study of the international migration of Chinese scientists, 1998–2006. Asian and Pacific Migration Journal 25(3): 296–319.
Godechot, Olivier, and Alexandra Louvet. 2010. Academic Inbreeding: An Evaluation. Laviedesidees.fr. Retrieved from http://www.booksandideas.net/Academic-Inbreeding-An-Evaluation.html. Accessed 20 Mar 2019.
Gorelova, Olga, and Maria Yudkevich. 2015. Academic Inbreeding: State of the Literature. In Academic Inbreeding and Mobility in Higher Education: Global Perspectives, eds. Philip G. Altbach, Maria Yudkevich, and Laura E. Rumbley, 17–44. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Heitor, Manuel, Hugo Horta, and Joana Mendonça. 2014. Developing human capital and research capacity: Science policies promoting brain gain. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 82: 6–22.
Hirsch, Jorge E. 2005. An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 102(46): 16569–16572.
Horta, Hugo. 2013. Deepening our understanding of academic inbreeding effects on research information exchange and scientific output: New insights for academic based research. Higher Education 65(4): 487–510.
Horta, Hugo, Francisco M. Veloso, and Rócio Grediaga. 2010. Navel gazing: Academic inbreeding and scientific productivity. Management Science 56(3): 414–429.
Horta, Hugo, Jisun Jung, and João M. Santos. 2018a. Effects of mobilities on the research output and its multidisciplinarity of academics in Hong Kong and Macau: An exploratory study. Higher Education Quarterly 72(3): 250–265.
Horta, Hugo, and Maria Yudkevich. 2016. The role of academic inbreeding in developing higher education systems: Challenges and possible solutions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 113: 363–372.
Horta, Hugo, Mattia Cattaneo, and Michele Meoli. 2018b. PhD funding as a determinant of PhD and career research performance. Studies in Higher Education 43(3): 542–570.
Inanc, Ozlem, and Onur Tuncer. 2011. The effect of academic inbreeding on scientific effectiveness. Scientometrics 88(3): 885–898.
Katranidis, Stelios, Theodore Panagiotidis, and Costas Zontanos. 2017. Economists, research performance and national inbreeding: North versus south. Economic Notes: Review of Banking, Finance and Monetary Economics 46(1): 145–163.
Larivière, Vincent, Yves Gingras, and Éric Archambault. 2006. Canadian collaboration networks: A comparative analysis of the natural sciences, social sciences and the humanities. Scientometrics 68(3): 519–533.
Loeys, Tom, Beatrijs Moerkerke, Olivia de Smet, and Ann Buysse. 2012. The analysis of zero-inflated count data: Beyond zero-inflated Poisson regression. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 65: 163–180. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8317.2011.02031.x.
Long, Rebecca G., William P. Bowers, Tim Barnett, and Michael C. White. 1998. Research Productivity of Graduates in Management: Effects of Academic Origin and Academic Affiliation. Academy of Management Journal 41: 704–714.
Mairesse, Jack and Laure Turner. 2002. A look at individual differences in scientific research productivity: an econometric analysis of the publications of the French CNRS physicists in condensed matter (1980–1997). In Proceedings of the Conference Rethinking Science Policy: Analytical Frameworks for Evidence-Based Policy, SPRU, Brighton, March 21–23.
Musselin, Christine. 2004. Towards a European academic labour market? Some lessons drawn from empirical studies on academic mobility. Higher Education 48(1): 55–78.
Murray, Mike. 2014. Predicting scientific research output at the University of KwaZulu-Natal. South African Journal of Science 110: 01–04.
Padilla, Laura Elena. 2008. How has Mexican faculty been trained? A national perspective and a case study. Higher Education 56(2): 167–183.
Pan, Shouan. 1993. A study of faculty inbreeding at eleven land-grant universities. Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 10259. http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/10259.
Pechincha, Paula, António Marques, and José António Sarsfield Cabral. 2015. A universidade portuguesa nos rankings: estratégias de melhoria. Comunicar e Avaliar Ciência 57.
Pelz, Donald C., and Frank M. Andrews. 1996. Scientists in organizations: Productive climates for research and development. New York: Wiley.
Puuska, Hanna-Mari, Reetta Muhonen, and Yrjö Leino. 2014. International and domestic co-publishing and their citation impact in different disciplines. Scientometrics 98(2): 823–839.
Shin, Jung Cheol, Jisun Jung, and Soo Jeung Lee. 2016. Academic inbreeding of Korean professors: Academic training, networks, and their performance. In Biographies and careers throughout academic life, eds. Jesús F. Galaz-Fontes et al., 187–206. Cham: Springer.
Sin, Cristina, Orlanda Tavares, and Alberto Amaral. 2017. The impact of programme accreditation on Portuguese higher education provision. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 42(6): 860–871.
Sivak, Elizaveta, and Maria Yudkevich. 2015. Academic immobility and inbreeding in Russian universities. In Academic Inbreeding and Mobility in Higher Education, eds. Maria Yudkevich, Philip G. Altbach, and Laura E. Rumbley, 130–155. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Smeby, Jens-Christian, and Sverre Try. 2005. Departmental contexts and faculty research activity in Norway. Research in Higher Education 46: 593–619.
Smyth, Russell, and Vinod Mishra. 2014. Academic inbreeding in Australian law schools. Scientometrics 98(1): 583–618.
Soler, Manuel. 2001. How inbreeding affects productivity in Europe. Nature 411(6834): 132.
Sologoub, Ilona, and Tom Coupé. 2015. Academic Inbreeding in Ukraine. In Academic Inbreeding and Mobility in Higher Education, eds. Maria Yudkevich, Philip G. Altbach, and Laura E. Rumbley, 228–258. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Tavares, Orlanda, Sónia Cardoso, Teresa Carvalho, Sofia Branco Sousa, and Rui Santiago. 2015. Academic inbreeding in the Portuguese academia. Higher Education 69(6): 991–1006.
Tavares, Orlanda, Vasco Lança, and Alberto Amaral. 2017. Academic Inbreeding in Portugal: Does Insularity Play a Role? Higher Education Policy 30(3): 381–399.
Wyer, Jean C., and Clifton F. Conrad. 1984. Institutional inbreeding reexamined. American Educational Research Journal 21(1): 213–225.
Zeileis, Achim, Christian Kleiber, and Simon Jackman. 2008. Regression Models for Count Data in R. Journal of Statistical Software 27(8): 1–25.
Acknowledgements
Funding was provided by Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (Grant no. UID/CED/00757/2013).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tavares, O., Sin, C. & Lança, V. Inbreeding and Research Productivity Among Sociology PhD Holders in Portugal. Minerva 57, 373–390 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-019-09378-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-019-09378-1