Abstract
In this paper I have tried to find some points of comparison between the methods respectively of phenomenology and linguistic analysis. I have tried to show that they are more alike than they appear at first sight, and that in their extreme forms they are as it were “symmetrical” deviations from what may come to be an agreed norm.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Clark L. Hull: Principles of Behaviour, Chap. I.
Ibid., p. 114.
M. Merleau-Ponty: Phénoménologie de la Perception, p. 9.
For detailed exposition of phenomenologist arguments against traditional empiricism and “intellectualism” see M. Merleau-Ponty: Phénoménologie de la Perception, Introduction.
P. T. Geach: Mental Acts. Sections 10 and 11.
Cf. M. Merleau-Ponty: Les Sciences de l’Homme et la Phénoménologie, pp. 26–27. “They (the classical physicists) contributed to develop an eidetic science of physical things.”
Phénoménologie de la Perception, Preface, xvi.
Logic and Language Series II.
Waraock: British Philosophy Since 1900, p. 158. 11 I owe this point to Mr. Michael Kullmann.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1976 Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Taylor, C. (1976). Phenomenology and Linguistic Analysis : I. In: Durfee, H.A. (eds) Analytic Philosophy and Phenomenology. American University Publications in Philosophy, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1407-6_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1407-6_13
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-247-1880-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-1407-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive