Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter March 29, 2024

What Do You Mean by Trust? The Free Associations of the Word “Trust”

  • Jana Tencerová EMAIL logo , Zuzana Kaššaiová and Branislav Uhrecký
From the journal Human Affairs

Abstract

The notion of trust has been discussed among several scientific fields, but it still lacks the joint theory. The goal was to analyze the trust associations of 600 participants and clarify how people associate the word “trust”. Overall, 600 participants produced 1800 associations which were sequentially divided into five domains and 14 categories. The findings imply, that when it comes to trust people tend to associate it mainly with relationships and positive emotions. The fact that associations involved mainly positive emotional states and significant others may show, that trust in itself is something emotional and obviously bound to people we have the strongest bonds with.


Corresponding author: Jana Tencerová, Institute of Experimental Psychology, Centre of Social and Psychological Sciences SAS, Bratislava, Slovakia, E-mail:

Award Identifier / Grant number: 2/0035/20

Funding source: This work was supported by the project VEGA 2/0030/24: Nedôverčivá mentalita a nenormatívne správanie: Od vnímania sociálnej reality k porušovaniu sociálnych noriem

Award Identifier / Grant number: 2/0030/24

  1. Research funding: Writing this work was supported by the Vedecká grantová agentúra VEGA under Grant 2/0035/20 and by the project VEGA 2/0030/24: Nedôverčivá mentalita a nenormatívne správanie: Od vnímania sociálnej reality k porušovaniu sociálnych noriem.

  2. Compliance with ethical standards: Authors confirm, that the manuscript adheres to ethical guidlines of both national ethic guidelines and APA. The research was conducted ethically with the opportunity to suspend from it and it was also fully anonymous. The results are reported honestly and the study is not plagiarized.

  3. Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no potential conflicts of interests.

Appendix 1: Centrality values of each node in the network analysis

Closeness Betweenness Eigenvector
Significant others 1.0 6.69 1.0
Relationships 1.0 6.69 1.0
Other relationships 0.68 0.37 0.59
Prosocial behaviour 0.83 0.82 0.88
Science and education 0.56 0.00 0.25
Government and politics 0.68 0.24 0.59
Public and private services 1.0 6.69 1.0
Positive affect 0.94 2.69 0.98
Negative affect 0.71 0.36 0.69
Cognition 0.87 0.35 0.83
Traits 0.87 0.35 0.83
Sanctity values 0.83 1.51 0.66
Abstract values 0.79 0.47 0.83
Practical values 0.75 1.29 0.71
Intention to trust 0.83 0.82 0.88
Uncertainty 0.83 1.26 0.66

References

Baumeister, R. F., and M. R. Leary. 1995. “The Need to Belong: Desire for Interpersonal Attachments as a Fundamental Human Motivation.” Psychological Bulletin 117 (3): 497–529. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.117.3.497.Search in Google Scholar

Bean, C. 2003. “Citizen Confidence in Social and Political Institutions in a Changing World.” In Social Change in the 21st Century 2003 Conference Refereed Proceedings. Centre for Social Change Research, edited by L. Buys, J. Lyddon, J. Lon, and R. Bradley, 1–18. Australia: School of Humanities and Human Services QUT. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/114/.Search in Google Scholar

Belli, S., and F. Broncano. 2017. “Trust as a Meta-Emotion.” Metaphilosophy 48 (4): 430–448. https://doi.org/10.1111/meta.12255.Search in Google Scholar

Bengoa, D. S., and H. R. Kaufmann. 2015. “The Influence of Trust on the Trilogy of Knowledge Creation, Sharing, and Transfer.” Thunderbird International Business Review 58 (3): 239–49. https://doi.org/10.1002/tie.21743.Search in Google Scholar

Branzei, O., I. Vertinsky, and R. D. Camp. 2007. “Culture-Contingent Signs of Trust in Emergent Relationships.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 104 (1): 61–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.11.002.Search in Google Scholar

Bromiley, P., and J. Harris. 2006. “Chapter 7: Trust, Transaction Cost Economics, and Mechanisms.” In Handbook of Trust Research, edited by R. Bachmann and A. Zaheer. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.10.4337/9781847202819.00014Search in Google Scholar

Brown, S. L., and R. M. Brown. 2009. “Selective Investment Theory: Recasting the Functional Significance of Close Relationships.” Psychological Inquiry 17: 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli1701_01.Search in Google Scholar

Carlsson, F., E. Demeke, P. Martinsson, and T. Tesemma. 2018. Measuring Trust in Institutions. Department of Economics. (Working Paper in Economics No. 730). http://hdl.handle.net/2077/56336.Search in Google Scholar

Clore, G. L. 1992. “Cognitive Phenomenology: Feelings and the Construction of Judgment.” In The Construction of Social Judgments, edited by L. L. Martin, and A. Tesser, 133–63. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Inc.Search in Google Scholar

Coleman, J. S. 1990. Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Damasio, A. 2008. Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain. Rochester: Vintage Digital.Search in Google Scholar

Devos, T., D. Spini, and S. H. Schwartz. 2002. “Conflicts among Human Values and Trust in Institutions.” British Journal of Social Psychology 41 (4): 481–94. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466602321149849.Search in Google Scholar

Dunn, J. R., and M. E. Schweitzer. 2005. “Feeling and Believing: The Influence of Emotion on Trust.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 88 (5): 736–48. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.5.736.Search in Google Scholar

Farr, R. M. 1996. The Roots of Modern Social Psychology: 1872–1954. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1997-08228-000.Search in Google Scholar

Freitag, M., and P. C. Bauer. 2016. “Personality Traits and the Propensity to Trust Friends and Strangers.” The Social Science Journal 53 (4): 467–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2015.12.002.Search in Google Scholar

Gambetta, D. 2000. “Can We Trust Trust?” In Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relationships, edited by D. Gambetta, 213–37. Oxford, Great Britain: University of Oxford.Search in Google Scholar

Greenberg, L. S. 2016. Emotion-Focused Therapy: Coaching Clients to Work through Their Feelings. Washington: American Psychological Association.10.1037/14692-000Search in Google Scholar

Haidt, J., and J. Graham. 2019. “Planet of Durkheimians, where Community, Authority, and Sacredness are Foundations of Morality.” In Social and Psychological Bases of Ideology and System Justification, edited by J. T. Jost, A. C. Kay, and H. Thorisdottir, 371–401. Oxford, Great Britain: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195320916.003.015Search in Google Scholar

Halamová, J., M. Baránková, B. Strnádelová, and J. Koróniová. 2018. “Consensual Qualitative Research on Free Associations for Compassion and Self-Compassion.” Human Affairs 28 (3): 253–70, https://doi.org/10.1515/humaff-2018-0021.Search in Google Scholar

Hardin, R. 2002. Trust and Trustworthiness. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Search in Google Scholar

Hays, R. B. 1989. “The Day-to-Day Functioning of Close versus Casual Friendships.” Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 6 (1): 21–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/026540758900600102.Search in Google Scholar

Hoffman, A. M. 2002. “A Conceptualization of Trust in International Relations.” European Journal of International Relations 8: 375–401. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066102008003003.Search in Google Scholar

Höijer, B. 2011. “Social Representations Theory.” Nordicom Review 32 (2): 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1515/nor-2017-0109.Search in Google Scholar

Issa, R. R. A., and J. Haddad. 2008. “Perceptions of the Impacts of Organizational Culture and Information Technology on Knowledge Sharing in Construction.” Construction Innovation 8 (3): 182–201. https://doi.org/10.1108/14714170810888958.Search in Google Scholar

Johnson, J. L., and J. B. Cullen. 2017. “Trust in Cross‐Cultural Relationships.” In The Blackwell Handbook of Cross‐Cultural Management, edited by M. J. Gannon, and K. L. Newman, 335–60. New Jersey: Blackwell Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405164030.ch17.Search in Google Scholar

Kelley, H. H. 1992. “Common-Sense Psychology and Scientific Psychology.” Annual Review of Psychology 43 (1): 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.43.020192.000245.Search in Google Scholar

Klein, E. 2020. Why We’re Polarized. New York: Simon & Schuster.Search in Google Scholar

Kramer, R. M., (2006).“ Trust as Situated Cognition: An Ecological Perspective on Trust Decisions.” In Handbook of Trust Research, edited by R. Bachmann, and A. Zaheer, 68–83. Cheltenham; Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.10.4337/9781847202819.00010Search in Google Scholar

Lahno, B. 2001. “On the Emotional Character of Trust.” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 4: 171–89. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1011425102875.10.1023/A:1011425102875Search in Google Scholar

Lewicki, R. J., E. C. Tomlinson, and N. Gillespie. 2006. “Models of Interpersonal Trust Development: Theoretical Approaches, Empirical Evidence, and Future Directions.” Journal of Management 32 (6): 991–1022. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206306294405.Search in Google Scholar

Lewis, J. D., and A. Weigert. 1985. “Trust as a Social Reality.” Social Forces 63 (4): 967. https://doi.org/10.2307/2578601.Search in Google Scholar

Luhmann, N. 1979. Trust and Power. New York: Wiley & Sons.Search in Google Scholar

Mayer, R. C., J. H. Davis, and F. D. Schoorman. 1995. “An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust.” Academy of Management Review 20 (3): 709–34. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080335.Search in Google Scholar

McAllister, D. J.. 1995. “Affect- and Cognition-Based Trust as Foundations for Interpersonal Cooperation in Organizations.” Academy of Management Journal 38 (1): 24–59. https://doi.org/10.5465/256727.Search in Google Scholar

McKnight, D. H., L. L. Cummings, and N. L. Chervany. 1998. “Initial Trust Formation in New Organizational Relationships.” Academy of Management Review 23 (3): 473–90. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.926622.Search in Google Scholar

McLeod, J. 2013. “Consensual Qualitative Research: A Practical Resource for Investigating Social Science Phenomena.” Psychotherapy Research 23 (3): 366–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2012.725956.Search in Google Scholar

Mitchell, P. 1997. Introduction to Theory of Mind: Children, Autism, and Apes. London: Edward Arnold Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

Piermattéo, A. 2022. “Social Representations and Emotions.” European Psychologist 27 (4): 302–19. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000459.Search in Google Scholar

Poppo, L., K. Z. Zhou, and J. J. Li. 2015. “When Can you Trust “Trust”? Calculative Trust, Relational Trust, and Supplier Performance.” Strategic Management Journal 37 (4): 724–41. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2374.Search in Google Scholar

Rahn, W. M., and J. E. Transue. 1998. “Social Trust and Value Change: The Decline of Social Capital in American Youth, 1976–1995.” Political Psychology 19 (3): 545–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895x.00117.Search in Google Scholar

Rompf, S. A. 2014. Trust and Rationality: An Integrative Framework for Trust Research. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.10.1007/978-3-658-07327-5Search in Google Scholar

Rose, S., and F. C. Serafica. 1986. “Keeping and Ending Casual, Close and Best Friendships.” Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 3 (3): 275–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407586033002.Search in Google Scholar

Rotter, J. B. 1971. “Generalized Expectancies for Interpersonal Trust.” American Psychologist 26 (5): 443–52. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0031464.Search in Google Scholar

Rousseau, D. M., S. B. Sitkin, R. S. Burt, and C. Camerer. 1998. “Not So Different after All: A Cross-Discipline View of Trust.” Academy of Management Review 23 (3): 393–404. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.926617.Search in Google Scholar

Rus, A., and H. Iglič. 2005. “Trust, Governance and Performance: The Role of Institutional and Interpersonal Trust in SME Development.” International Sociology 20 (3): 371–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580905055481.Search in Google Scholar

Sorrentino, R. M., J. G. Holmes, S. E. Hanna, and A. Sharp. 1995. “Uncertainty Orientation and Trust in Close Relationships: Individual Differences in Cognitive Styles.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 68 (2): 314–27. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.68.2.314.Search in Google Scholar

Storey, V. C. 1993. “Understanding semantic relationships.” The VLDB Journal 2: 455–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01263048.Search in Google Scholar

Thanetsunthorn, N., and R. Wuthisatian. 2019. “Understanding Trust across Cultures: An Empirical Investigation.” Review of International Business and Strategy 29 (4): 286–314. https://doi.org/10.1108/ribs-12-2018-0103.Search in Google Scholar

Thomas, T. D., K. Abts, K. Stroeken, and P. V. Weyden. 2015. “Measuring Institutional Trust: Evidence from Guyana.” Journal of Politics in Latin America 7 (3): 85–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/1866802X1500700303.Search in Google Scholar

Uslaner, E. M. 2016. “Who Do You Trust?” In Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Trust, edited by E. Shockley, T. Neal, L. Pytlik-Zillik, and B. Bornstein, 71–83. New York: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-22261-5_4Search in Google Scholar

Wagner, W., G. Duveen, R. M. Farr, S. Jovchelovitch, F. Lorenzi‐Cioldi, I. Marková, and D. Rose. 1999. “Theory and Method of Social Representations.” Asian Journal of Social Psychology 2 (1): 95–125. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-839x.00028.Search in Google Scholar

Weber, L. R., and A. Carter. 1997. “On Reconstructing Trust: Time, Intention, and Forgiveness.” Clinical Sociology Review 15 (1): 24–39.Search in Google Scholar

Weber, L. R., and A. Carter. 1998. “On Constructing Trust: Temporality, Self‐Disclosure, and Perspective‐Taking.” International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 18 (1): 7–26. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443339810788290.Search in Google Scholar

Zmerli, S., K. Newton, and J. R. Montero. 2007. “Trust in People, Confidence in Political Institutions, and Satisfaction with Democracy.” In Citizenship and Involvement in European Democracies: A Comparative Analysis, edited by J. W. van Deth, J. R. Montero, and A. Westholm, 35–65. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2023-09-06
Accepted: 2024-02-07
Published Online: 2024-03-29
Published in Print: 2024-04-25

© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 24.5.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/humaff-2023-0110/html
Scroll to top button