Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A remark on good reasons

  • Published:
Philosophical Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. “Good Reasons,”Philosophical Studies, January 1953, and “Proving a Moral Judgment,”Philosophical Studies, April 1953.

  2. “What You Will, or The Limits of Analysis,”Philosophical Studies, April 1952.

  3. “The proof that I shall give … shows that anyone denying that a certain fact is a good reason (prima facie and presumptively) against doing a certain thing is laying himself open to criticism of a sort just as serious as that he is contradicting himself, namely, that he is irrational.“ P. 7 in “Good Reasons.”

  4. Ibid., p. 14.

  5. Ibid., p. 14.

  6. Ibid., p. 8.

  7. Ibid., p. 14.

  8. Ibid., p. 8.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Minnesota, USA

    D. B. Terrell

Authors
  1. D. B. Terrell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Terrell, D.B. A remark on good reasons. Philos Stud 4, 58–63 (1953). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02333198

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02333198

Keywords

Search

Navigation