Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Internalization of Environmental Practices and Institutional Complexity: Can Stakeholders Pressures Encourage Greenwashing?

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper analyzes the determinants underlying the internalization of proactive environmental management proposed by certifiable environmental management systems (EMSs) such as those set out in ISO 14001 and the European Management and Auditing Scheme (EMAS). Using a study based on 232 usable questionnaires from EMAS-registered organizations, we explored the influence of institutional pressures from different stakeholders and the role of corporate strategy in the “substantial” versus “symbolic” integration of environmental practices. The results highlighted that although institutional pressures generally strengthen the internalization of proactive environmental practices, the influence of stakeholders can either support the integration of these practices or encourage their superficial adoption. For example, while pressure from suppliers and shareholders contribute to corporate greening, pressure from customers and industrial associations tend to encourage greenwashing (i.e., the superficial and misleading adoption of environmental practices). Product quality-oriented strategies also positively influence EMS internalization. The paper sheds light on the institutional complexity underlying the substantial versus symbolic implementation of environmental practices, and questions the dominant isomorphic view of EMS adoption. The paper also bridges the gap between complementary approaches on corporate greening, notably neo-institutional and stakeholder theories.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. That survey is available ta http://www.emas.de/fileadmin/user_upload/06_service/PDF-Dateien/EMAS_in_Germany_Evaluation_2012.pdf.

References

  • Ambec, S., & Lanoie, P. (2008). Does it pay to be green? A systematic overview. Academy of Management Perspectives, 22, 45–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aragón-Correa, J. A., & Rubio-Lopez, E. A. (2007). Proactive corporate environmental strategies: Myths and misunderstandings. Long Range Planning, 40, 357–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aragon-Correa, J. A., & Sharma, S. (2003). A contingent resource-based view of proactive corporate environmental strategy. Academy of Management Review, 28, 71–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atvesson, M. (1990). Organization: From substance to image? Organization studies, 11, 373–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bansal, P. (2003). From issues to actions: The importance of individual concerns and organizational values in responding to natural environmental issues. Organization Science, 14, 510–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bansal, P., & Bogner, W. C. (2002). Deciding on ISO 14001: Economics, institutions, and context. Long Range Planning, 35, 269–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bansal, P., & Hunter, T. (2003). Strategic explanation of the early adoption of ISO 14001. Journal of Business Ethics, 46, 197–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barla, P. (2007). ISO 14001 certification and environmental performance in Quebec’s pulp and paper industry. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 53, 291–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. B. (1986). Strategic factor markets: Expectations, luck, and business strategy. Management Science, 32, 1231–1241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bear, S., Rahman, N., & Post, C. (2010). The impact of board diversity and gender composition on corporate social responsibility and firm reputation. Journal of Business Ethics, 97, 207–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, M. A., & Rondinelli, D. A. (1998). Proactive corporate environmental management: A new industrial revolution. The Academy of Management Executive, 12, 38–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boiral, O. (2007). Corporate greening through ISO 14001: A rational myth? Organization Science, 18, 127–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boiral, O. (2011). Managing with ISO systems: Lessons from practice. Long Range Planning, 44, 197–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boiral, O. (2013). Sustainability reports as simulacra? A counter-account of A and A + GRI reports. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 26, 1036–1071.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boiral, O., & Henri, J. F. (2012). Modelling the impact of ISO 14001 on environmental performance: A comparative approach. Journal of Environmental Management, 99, 84–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, F., & Aragon-Correa, J. A. (2014). Greenwashing in corporate environmentalism research and practice: The importance of what we say and do. Organization Environment, 27, 107–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buysse, K., & Verbeke, A. (2003). Proactive environmental strategies: A stakeholder management perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 24, 453–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cannell, C., Oksenberg, L., Kalton, G., Bischoping, K., & Fowler, F. J. (1989). New techniques for pretesting survey questions. Research Report. Ann Arbor, MI: Survey Research Center, University of Michigan. http://www.psc.isr.umich.edu/dis/infoserv/isrpub/pdf/NewTechniquesPretestingSurveyQuestions_OCR.pdf. Accessed 11 February 2015.

  • Castka, P., & Prajogo, D. (2013). The effect of pressure from secondary stakeholders on the internalization of ISO 14001. Journal of Cleaner Production, 47, 245–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y.-S., & Chang, C.-H. (2013a). Greenwash and green trust: The mediation effects of green consumer confusion and green perceived risk. Journal of Business Ethics, 114, 489–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y., & Chang, C. (2013b). The determinants of green product development performance: Green dynamic capabilities, green transformational leadership, and green creativity. Journal of Business Ethics, 116, 107–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho, C. H., Laine, M., Roberts, R. W., & Rodrigue, M. (2015). Organized hypocrisy, Organizational façades, and sustainability reporting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 40, 78–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christmann, P. (2000). Effects of “best practices” of environmental management on cost advantage: The role of complementary assets. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 663–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christmann, P., & Taylor, G. (2006). Firm self-regulation through international certifiable standards: Determinants of symbolic versus substantive implementation. Journal of International Business Studies, 37, 863–883.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarkson, P. M., Lie, Y., Richardson, G. D., & Vasvari, F. P. (2008). Revisiting the relationship between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33, 303–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daddi, T., Magistrelli, M., Frey, M., & Iraldo, F. (2011). Do environmental management systems improve environmental performance? Empirical evidence from Italian companies. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 13, 845–862.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darnall, N. (2006). Why firms mandate ISO 14001 certification. Business and Society, 45, 354–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darnall, N., & Edwards, D. (2006). Predicting the cost of environmental management system adoption: The role of capabilities, resources and ownership structure. Strategic Management Journal, 27, 301–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darnall, N., Henriques, I., & Sadorsky, P. (2008). Do environmental management systems improve business performance in an international setting? Journal of International Management, 14, 364–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darnall, N., Henriques, I., & Sadorsky, P. (2010). Adopting proactive environmental strategy: The influence of stakeholders and firm size. Journal of Management Studies, 47, 1072–1094.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, R., & MacKinnon, J. D. (2004). Econometric theory and methods. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dechant, K., & Altman, B. (1994). Environmental leadership: From compliance to competitive advantage. Academy Of Management Executive, 8, 7–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • del Brío, J. Á., Fernández, E., Junquera, B., & Vázquez, C. J. (2001). Environmental managers and departments as driving forces of TQEM in Spanish industrial companies. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 18, 495–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Brio, J. A., Fernandez, E., & Junquera, B. (2007). Management and employee involvement in achieving an environmental action-based competitive advantage: An empirical study. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18, 491–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delmas, M. (2001). Stakeholders and competitive advantage: The case of ISO 14001. Production and Operations Management, 10, 343–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delmas, M. (2002). The diffusion of environmental management standards in Europe and the United States: An institutional perspective. Policy Sciences, 35, 91–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delmas, M., & Cuerel, Burbano V. (2011). The drivers of greenwashing. California Management Review, 54, 64–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delmas, M., & Montes-Sancho, M. J. (2010). Voluntary agreements to improve environmental quality: Symbolic and substantive cooperation. Strategic Management Journal, 31, 575–688.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delmas, M., & Toffel, M. W. (2004). Stakeholders and environmental management practices: An institutional framework. Business Strategy and the Environment, 13, 209–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delmas, M., & Toffel, M. W. (2008). Organizational responses to environmental demands: Opening the black box. Strategic Management Journal, 29, 1027–1055.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Maggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dogui, K., Boiral, O., & Heras-Saizarbitoria, I. (2014). Audit fees and auditor independence: The case of ISO 14001 certification. International Journal of Auditing, 18, 14–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drake, F., Purvis, M., & Hunt, J. (2004). Meeting the environmental challenge: A case of win–win or lose–win? A study of the UK baking and refrigeration industries. Business Strategy and the Environment, 13, 172–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du, X. (2014). How the market values greenwashing? Evidence from China. Journal of Business Ethics,. doi:10.1007/s10551-014-2122-y.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2011). EMAS and ISO 14001: Complementarities and differences. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/emas/pdf/factsheet/EMASiso14001_high.pdf. Accessed 11 February 2015.

  • European Commission. (2015). EMAS: Reports & statistics. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/emas/register/reports/reports.do. Accessed 11 February 2015.

  • Fan, Y., & Gencay, R. (1995). A consistent nonparametric test of symmetry in linear regression models. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90, 551–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernández-Muñiz, B., Montes-Peón, J. M., & Vázquez-Ordás, C. J. (2007). Safety culture: Analysis of the causal relationships between its key dimensions. Journal of Safety Research, 38, 627–641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernández-Muñiz, B., Montes-Peón, J. M., & Vázquez-Ordás, C. J. (2009). Relation between occupational safety management and firm performance. Safety Science, 47, 980–991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franchetti, M. (2011). ISO 14001 and solid waste generation rates in US manufacturing organizations: An analysis of relationship. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19, 1104–1109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fryxell, G., Wing-Hung, Lo C., & Chung, S. (2004). Influence of motivations for seeking ISO 14001 certification on perceptions of EMS effectiveness in China. Environmental Management, 33, 239–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glachant, M., Schucht, S., Bültmann, A., & Wätzold, F. (2002). Companies’ participation in EMAS: The influence of the public regulator. Business Strategy and the Environment, 11, 254–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomez, A., & Rodriguez, M. A. (2011). The effect of ISO 14001 certification on toxic emissions: An analysis of industrial facilities in the north of Spain. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19, 1091–1095.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, R., & Milne, M. (2002). Sustainability reporting: Who’s kidding whom. Chartered Accountants Journal of New Zealand, 81, 66–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, R., Díaz, A. M., Li, S. X., & Lorente, J. C. (2010). The multiplicity of institutional logics and the heterogeneity of organizational responses. Organization Science, 21, 521–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, R., Hinings, C. R., & Whetten, D. (2014). Rethinking institutions and organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 51, 1206–1220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, R., Raynard, M., Kodeih, F., Micelotta, E. R., & Lounsbury, M. (2011). Institutional complexity and organizational responses. Academy of Management Annals, 5, 317–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guoyou, Q., Saixing, Z., Xiaodong, L., & Chiming, T. (2012). Role of internalization process in defining the relationship between ISO 14001 certification and corporate environmental performance. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 19, 129–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gusmerotti, N. M., Testa, F., Amirante, D., & Frey, M. (2012). The role of negotiating tools in the environmental policy mix instruments: Determinants and effects of Environmental Agreements. Journal of Cleaner Production, 35, 39–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, S. L. (1995). A natural resource based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review, 20, 986–1014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, S. L., & Ahuja, G. (1996). Does it pay to be green? An empirical examination of the relationship between emission reduction and firm performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 5, 30–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawthorne, F. (2012). Ethical chic: The inside story of the companies we think we love. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henriques, I., & Sadorsky, P. (1996). The determinants of an environmentally responsive firm: An empirical approach. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 30, 381–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henriques, I., & Sadorsky, P. (1999). The relationship between environmental commitment and managerial perceptions of stakeholder importance. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 87–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heras‐Saizarbitoria, I., Arana, G., & Boiral, O. (2015). Outcomes of environmental management systems: The role of motivations and firms’ characteristics. Business Strategy and the Environment. doi:10.1002/bse.1884.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heras-Saizarbitoria, I., Arana Landín, G., & Molina-Azorín, J. F. (2011). Do drivers matter for the benefits of ISO 14001? International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 31, 192–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heras-Saizarbitoria, I., & Boiral, O. (2013). ISO 9001 and ISO 14001: Towards a research agenda on management system standards. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15, 47–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heras-Saizarbitoria, I., Kouakou, D., & Boiral, O. (2013). Shedding light on ISO 14001 certification audits. Journal of Cleaner Production, 51, 88–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Organization for Standardization. (2013) The ISO survey. http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_survey_executive-summary.pdf?v2013. Accessed 11 February 2015.

  • Iraldo, F., Testa, F., & Frey, M. (2009). Is an environmental management system able to influence environmental and competitive performance? The case of the eco-management and audit scheme (EMAS) in the European Union. Journal of Cleaner Production, 17, 1444–1452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, R. J., & Bansal, P. (2003). Seeing the need for ISO 14001. Journal of Management Studies, 40, 1047–1067.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, M. F., & Bruner, G. C. (2000). Social desirability bias: A neglected aspect of validity testing. Psychology and Marketing, 17, 79–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, A. A., & Lenox, M. J. (2001). Lean and green? An empirical examination of the relationship between lean production and environmental performance. Production and operations management, 10, 244–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, A. A., Lenox, M. J., & Terlaak, A. (2005). The strategic use of decentralized institutions: Exploring certification with the ISO 14001 management standard. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 1091–1106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, A., Prado, A. M., & Rivera, J. (2012). Industry self regulation and environmental protection. In P. Bansal & A. J. Hoffman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of business and the natural environment. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitazawa, S., & Sarkis, J. (2000). The relationship between ISO 14001 and continuous source reduction programs. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 20, 225–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lannelongue, G., Gonzalez-Benito, J., Gonzalez-Benito, O., & Gonzalez-Zapatero, C. (2015). Time compression diseconomies in environmental management: The effect of assimilation on environmental performance. Journal of Environmental Management, 147, 203–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laufer, W. S. (2003). Social accountability and corporate greenwashing. Journal of Business Ethics, 43(3), 253–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyon, T. P., & Montgomery, A. W. (2015). The means and end of greenwash. Organization & Environment, 28, 223–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marano, V., & Kostova, T. (2015). Unpacking the institutional complexity in adoption of CSR practices in multinational enterprises. Journal of Management Studies,. doi:10.1111/joms.12124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marziliano, N. (1998). Managing the corporate image and identity: A borderline between fiction and reality. International Studies of Management & Organization, 28, 3–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattingly, J. E., & Berman, S. (2006). Measurement of corporate social action: Discovering taxonomy in the Kinder Lydenburg domini ratings data. Business Society, 45, 20–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melnyk, S. A., Sroufe, R. P., & Calantone, R. (2003). Assessing the impact of environmental management systems on corporate and environmental performance. Journal of Operations Management, 21, 329–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura, M., Takahashi, T., & Vertinsky, I. (2001). Why Japanese firms choose to certify: A study of managerial responses to environmental issues. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 42, 23–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nawrocka, D. (2008). Inter-organizational use of EMSs in supply chain management: Some experiences from Poland and Sweden. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15, 260–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nishitani, K., Kaneko, S., Fujii, H., & Komatsu, S. (2012). Are firms’ voluntary environmental management activities beneficial for the environment and business? An empirical study focusing on Japanese manufacturing firms. Journal of Environmental Management, 105, 121–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, R. (2007). A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Quality & Quantity, 41, 673–690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16, 145–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, C. (1992). The antecedents of deinstitutionalization. Organization Studies, 13, 563–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pache, A. C., & Santos, F. (2010). When worlds collide: The internal dynamics of organizational responses to conflicting institutional demands. Academy of Management Review, 35, 455–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pache, A. C., & Santos, F. (2013). Inside the hybrid organization: Selective coupling as a response to competing institutional logics. Academy of Management Journal, 56, 972–1001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parguel, B., Benoît-Moreau, F., & Larceneux, F. (2011). How sustainability ratings might deter ‘greenwashing’: A closer look at ethical corporate communication. Journal of Business Ethics, 102, 15–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E., & van der Linde, C. (1995). Toward a new conception of the environment competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9, 97–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Post, C., Rahman, N., & McQuillen, C. (2014). From board composition to corporate environmental performance through sustainability-themed alliances. Journal of Business Ethics,. doi:10.1007/s10551-014-2231-7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Post, C., Rahman, N., & Rubow, E. (2011). Green governance: Boards of directors’ composition and environmental corporate social responsibility. Business and Society, 50, 189–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potoski, M., & Prakash, A. (2005). Green clubs and voluntary governance: ISO 14001 and firms’ regulatory compliance. American Journal of Political Science, 49, 235–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potoski, M., & Prakash, A. (2013). Do voluntary programs reduce pollution? Examining ISO 14001′s effectiveness across countries. Policy Studies Journal, 41(2), 273–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prakash, A., & Potoski, M. (2014). Global private regimes, domestic public law ISO 14001 and pollution reduction. Comparative Political Studies, 47, 369–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qi, G., Zeng, S., Li, X., & Tam, C. (2012). Role of internalization process in defining the relationship between ISO 14001 certification and corporate environmental performance. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 19, 129–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qi, G., Zeng, S., Yin, H., & Lin, H. (2013). ISO and OSHAS certification. How stakeholders affect corporate decision. Management Decision, 51, 1983–2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahman, N., & Post, C. (2012). Measurement issues in environmental corporate social responsibility (ECSR): Toward a transparent, reliable, and construct valid instrument. Journal of Business Ethics, 105, 307–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raines, S. S., & Prakash, A. (2005). Leadership matters: Policy entrepreneurship in corporate environmental policy making. Administration & Society, 37, 3–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy, M. J., Boiral, O., & Lagacé, D. (2001). Environmental commitment and manufacturing excellence: A comparative study within Canadian industry. Business Strategy and the Environment, 10, 257–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy, M. J., Boiral, O., & Paillé, P. (2013). Pursuing quality and environmental performance: Initiatives and supporting processes. Business Process Management Journal, 19, 30–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russo, M. V. (2009). Explaining the impact of ISO 14001 on emission performance: A dynamic capabilities perspective on process and learning. Business Strategy and the Environment, 18, 307–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russo, M. V., & Fouts, P. A. (1997). A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 40(3), 534–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkis, J., Gonzalez-Torre, P., & Adenso-Diaz, B. (2010). Stakeholder pressure and the adoption of environmental practices: The mediating effect of training. Journal of Operations Management, 28, 163–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaefer, A. (2007). Contrasting institutional and performance accounts of environmental management systems: Three case studies in the UK water & sewerage industry. Journal of Management Studies, 44, 506–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaltegger, S., Lüdeke-Freund, F., & Hansen, E. G. (2012). Business cases for sustainability: The role of business model innovation for corporate sustainability. International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development, 6, 95–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, A. G., Palazzo, G., & Seidl, D. (2013). Managing legitimacy in complex and heterogeneous environments: Sustainable development in a globalized world. Journal of Management Studies, 50, 259–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. R., Ruef, M., Mendel, M., & Caronna, G. (2000). Institutional change and healthcare organizations: From professional dominance to managed care. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, S. (2000). Managerial Interpretation of organizational context as predictors of corporate choice of environmental strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 681–697.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, S., & Vredenburg, H. (1998). Proactive corporate environmental strategy and the development of competitively valuable organizational capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 19, 729–753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smets, M., & Jarzabkowski, P. (2013). Reconstructing institutional complexity in practice: A relational model of institutional work and complexity. Human Relations, 66, 1279–1309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steensma, H. K., Tihanyi, L., Lyles, M. A., & Dhanaraj, C. (2005). The evolving value of foreign partnerships in transitioning economies. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 213–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Testa, F., Battaglia, M., & Bianchi, L. (2012). The diffusion of CSR initiatives among SMEs in industrial clusters: Some findings from Italian experiences. International Journal of Technology Management, 58, 152–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Testa, F., & Iraldo, F. (2010). Shadows and lights of GSCM (green supply chain management): Determinants and effects of these practices based on a multi-national study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18, 953–962.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Testa, F., Rizzi, F., Daddi, T., Gusmerotti, N. M., Iraldo, F., & Frey, M. (2014). EMAS and ISO 14001: The differences in effectively improving environmental performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 68, 165–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tourangeau, R., & Yan, T. (2007). Sensitive Questions in Surveys. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 859–883.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Halderen, M. D., Bhatt, M., Berens, G. A., Brown, T. J., & Van Riel, C. B. (2014). Managing impressions in the face of rising stakeholder pressures: Examining oil companies’ shifting stances in the climate change debate. Journal of Business Ethics,. doi:10.1007/s10551-014-2400-8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westermann-Behaylo, M., Berman, S. L., & Van Buren, H. J, I. I. I. (2014). The influence of institutional logics on corporate responsibility toward employees. Business and Society, 53, 714–746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, C. W., Lai, K. H., Shang, K. C., Lu, C. S., & Leung, T. K. P. (2012). Green operations and the moderating role of environmental management capability of suppliers on manufacturing firm performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 140, 283–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, J. (2013). Differentiated customer pressures and environmental policies in China. Business Strategy and the Environment,. doi:10.1002/bse.1812.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, H., & Schmeidler, P. J. (2009). Why do standardized ISO 14001 environmental management systems lead to heterogeneous environmental outcomes? Business Strategy and the Environment, 18, 469–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zobel, T. (2013). ISO 14001 certification in manufacturing firms: A tool for those in need or an indication of greenness? Journal of Cleaner Production, 43, 37–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Sant’Anna School of Advanced Studies – Institute of Management, Piazza Martiri della Libertà 33, 56127, Pisa, Italy

    Francesco Testa & Fabio Iraldo

  2. Faculté des Sciences de L’administration, Département de Management, Université Laval, Pavillon Palasis-Prince, 2325, rue de la Terrasse, Local 1638, Québec, QC, G1V 0A6, Canada

    Olivier Boiral

Authors
  1. Francesco Testa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Olivier Boiral
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Fabio Iraldo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francesco Testa.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Testa, F., Boiral, O. & Iraldo, F. Internalization of Environmental Practices and Institutional Complexity: Can Stakeholders Pressures Encourage Greenwashing?. J Bus Ethics 147, 287–307 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2960-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2960-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation