Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter August 14, 2023

Powers that Reside in Communication

  • Mariam Thalos ORCID logo EMAIL logo
From the journal SATS

Abstract

Is it possible to measure a people’s capacity for containing the ambitions of any regime at its helm—its ability to resist the power of a tyrant? We begin here from the premise that this power has to be in proportion to individuals’ capacity (both individually and in groups) for communicating, at least among themselves, dissatisfaction with the regime. As the paper subsequently shows, by articulating an ontology of information diffusion on a communication network structure, it is possible to take some stock of the features of a communications network that facilitate resistance to tyranny (among other things), and so to begin answering questions about the sort of power that people living within them might be able to mobilize, while not yet answering outright the question of how to measure the power to resist.


Corresponding author: Mariam Thalos, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, USA, E-mail:

References

Arden, O., and A. Myers. 2016. “A Calculus for Flow-Limited Authorization.” CSF. Also available at http://www.cs.cornell.edu/andru/papers/flac/.10.1109/CSF.2016.17Search in Google Scholar

Arendt, H. 1967. “Truth and Politics.” In The New Yorker, 49. New York: Condé Nast.Search in Google Scholar

Arendt, H. 1970. On Violence. San Diego: Harcourt, Brace, Javanovich.Search in Google Scholar

Castro, C., and A. K. Pham. 2020. “Is the Attention Economy Noxious?” Philosophers’ Imprint 20 (17): 1–13.Search in Google Scholar

Centola, D. 2020. How Behavior Spreads: The Science of Complex Contagions. Princeton University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Chenoweth, E. 2021. Civil Resistance: What Everyone Needs to Know. New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Chenoweth, E., and M. Belgioioso. 2019. “The Physics of Dissent and the Effects of Movement Momentum.” Nature Human Behaviour 3 (10): 1088–95. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0665-8.Search in Google Scholar

Chenoweth, E., E. Perkoski, and S. Kang. 2017. “State Repression and Nonviolent Resistance.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 61 (9): 1950–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002717721390.Search in Google Scholar

Chenoweth, E., and M. J. Stephan. 2011. Why Civil Resistance Works: The Strategic Logic of Nonviolent Conflict. New York: Columbia University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Dawkins, R., and J. Krebs. 1978. Animal Signals: Information or Manipulation? Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach, edited by J. Krebs, and N. B. Davies, 282–309. New Jersey: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Eliassi-Rad, T., H. Farrell, D. Garcia, S. Lewandowsky, P. Palacios, D. Ross, D. Sornette, K. Thébault, and K. Wiesner. 2020. “What Science Can Do for Democracy: A Complexity Science Approach.” Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 7: 30. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-0518-0.Search in Google Scholar

Frank, R. 2012. The Darwin Economy. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.Search in Google Scholar

Frank, R. 2005. “Positional Externalities Cause Large and Preventable Welfare Losses.” American Economic Review 95 (2): 137–41. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282805774670392.Search in Google Scholar

Goldberg, S. 2010. Relying on Others: An Essay in Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199593248.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Goldman, A. 1978. “Epistemics: The Regulative Theory of Cognition.” The Journal of Philosophy 75: 509–23. https://doi.org/10.2307/2025838.Search in Google Scholar

Goldman, A. 2001. “Experts: Which Ones Should You Trust?” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 63 (1): 85–110. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1933-1592.2001.tb00093.x.Search in Google Scholar

Goldman, A., and C. O’Connor. 2019. “Social Epistemology.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2019 Edition), edited by E. N. Zalta. Also available at https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2019/entries/epistemology-social/.Search in Google Scholar

Hirsch, F. 1977. The Social Limits to Growth. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Search in Google Scholar

Ho, B. 2022. Why Trust Matters. New York: Columbia University Press.10.7312/ho--18960Search in Google Scholar

Jamieson, K. H., and J. N. Cappella. 2008. Echo Chamber: Rush Limbaugh and the Conservative Media Establishment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lailvaux, S. P., L. T. Reaney, and P. R. Y. Backwell. 2009. “Dishonest Signalling of Fighting Ability and Multiple Performance Traits in the Fiddler Crab Uca Mjoebergi.” Functional Ecology 23 (2): 359–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2008.01501.x.Search in Google Scholar

Locke, J. 1689/1988. In Two Treatises, Two Treatises of Government, edited by P. Laslett. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511810268Search in Google Scholar

McGarity, T., and W. Wagner. 2008. Bending Science: How Special Interests Corrupt Public Health Research. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Mercier, H., and D. Sperber. 2011. “Why Do Humans Reason? Arguments for an Argumentative Theory.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (2): 57–74.10.1017/S0140525X10000968Search in Google Scholar

Nguyen, T. 2020. “Echo Chambers and Epistemic Bubbles.” Episteme 17 (2): 141–61. https://doi.org/10.1017/epi.2018.32.Search in Google Scholar

Nye, J. 2004. Soft Power. Washington, DC: Public Affairs Press.Search in Google Scholar

Oreskes, N. O. 2010. Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Climate Change. London: Bloomsbury Press.Search in Google Scholar

Pritchard, D. 2006. What is This Thing Called Knowledge? Oxfordshire: Routledge.10.4324/9780203968468Search in Google Scholar

Rustow, D. 1999. “Transitions to Democracy: Toward a Dynamic Model.” In Transitions to Democracy, edited by L. Anderson. New York: Columbia University Press.10.7312/ande11590-004Search in Google Scholar

Sabelfeld, A., and A. Myers. 2003. “Language-based Information-Flow Security.” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communication 21 (1): 5–19, https://doi.org/10.1109/jsac.2002.806121.Search in Google Scholar

Stanley, J. 2020. How Fascism Works. New York: Ramdom House.Search in Google Scholar

Sunstein, C. 2009. Republic.com 2.0. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Talisse, R. B. 2019. Overdoing Democracy: Why We Must Put Politics in its Place. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780190924195.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Thalos, M. 2013. “Truth Deserves to Be Believed.” Philosophy 88 (2): 179–96. https://doi.org/10.1017/s003181911300017x.Search in Google Scholar

Thalos, M. 2015. “Who Will Advise Us? an Essay on the Proper Relationship of Science and Political Institutions in Democratic Societies.” SATS: Northern European Journal of Philosophy 16: 67–95.10.2139/ssrn.2618223Search in Google Scholar

Tosi, J., and B. Warmke. 2020. Grandstanding: The Use and Abuse of Moral Talk. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780190900151.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2023-08-14
Published in Print: 2023-11-27

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 2.5.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/sats-2023-0010/html
Scroll to top button