Abstract
This paper was written to commemorate the 20th anniversary of the University of Nottingham’s Easter School on “Issues in Agricultural Bioethics,” organized by Ben Mepham in 1993. At that time, agricultural ethics was being envisioned as an interdisciplinary sub-discipline comparable to that of medical ethics. Agricultural ethicists would co-operate with other agricultural faculty to produce careful articulation, analysis and critique (or defense) of norms and values being implicitly assumed by agricultural researchers, practitioners and policy makers. Roughly two factors have conspired to substantially limit the realization of that vision in the intervening 20 years. First, the institutional environment within agricultural universities was far less conducive to such an activity than medical schools. Second, while the rise of a food-oriented social movement might have provided new opportunities for food ethics, the social movement orientation has actually constrained the kind of philosophical work typically undertaken by bioethicists. The paper ends with a brief note calling for a renewal of the original vision.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aiken, W., and H. LaFollette (eds.). 1977. World hunger and moral obligation. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Beauchamp, T.L., and J.F. Childress. 2009. Principles of biomedical ethics, 7th ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
Brown, P., and H. Shue (eds.). 1977. Food policy: The responsibility of the United States in the life and death choices. New York: The Free Press.
Burkhardt, J. 2000. Coming full circle? Agrarian Ideals and pragmatist ethics in the modern land-grant university. In The agrarian roots of pragmatism, ed. P.B. Thompson and T.C. Hilde, 279–303. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.
Hanson, V.D. 1995. The other Greeks: The family farm and the Agrarian roots of Western Civilization. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Harrison, R. 1964. Animal machines: The new factory farming industry. London, UK: V. Stuart.
Haynes, R., and R. Lanier. n.d. Agriculture, change and human values: Proceedings of a multidisciplinary conference, October 18–21, 1982. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida.
Holt, D. 1997. Practical ethics in agronomic research. Advances in Agronomy 60: 149–190.
Jonas, H. 1984. The imperative of responsibility: In search of an ethics for the technological age. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Johnson, G.L. 1976. Philosophic foundations: Problems, knowledge, solutions. European Journal of Agricultural Economics 3(2–3): 207–234.
Johnson, G.L. 1982. Agro-ethics: Extension, research and teaching. Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics 14(July): 1–10.
Johnson, G.L. 1990. Ethical dilemmas posed by recent and prospective developments with respect to agricultural research. Agriculture and Human Values 7(3–4): 23–35.
Kaiser, M., and E.M. Forsberg. 2001. Assessing fisheries—Using an ethical matrix in a participatory process. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 14(2): 191–200.
Kaiser, M., K. Millar, E. Thorstensen, and S. Tomkins. 2007. Developing the ethical matrix as a decision support framework: GM fish as a case study. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 20(1): 65–80.
Kronenberg, L. 2009. Allegories of farming from Greece and Rome: Philosophical Satire in Xenophon, Varro, and Virgil. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lex, M. 1995. Public acceptability of agricultural biotechnology. In Issues in agricultural bioethics, ed. T.B. Mepham, G.A. Tucker, and J. Wiseman, 387–401. Nottingham: Nottingham University Press.
McPherson, C.B. 1962. The political theory of possessive individualism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mepham, T.B. 1995. Bioethical issues in the marketing of infant foods. In Issues in agricultural bioethics, ed. T.B. Mepham, G.A. Tucker, and J. Wiseman, 73–89. Nottingham: Nottingham University Press.
Mepham, T.B. 2000. A framework for the ethical analysis of novel foods: The ethical matrix. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 12(2): 165–176.
Mepham, T.B. 2005. Food ethics. In Ethics, law and society, ed. V.J. Gunning, and S. Holm, 141–152. Hants: Ashgate Publishing.
Mepham, T.B. 2010. The ethical matrix as a tool in policy interventions: The obesity crisis. In Food ethics, ed. F.-T. Gottwald, H.W. Ingensiep, and M. Meinhardt, 17–29. New York: Springer.
Mepham, T.B., G.A. Tucker, and J. Wiseman (eds.). 1995. Issues in agricultural bioethics. Nottingham: Nottingham University Press.
Mepham, T.B., M. Kaiser, E. Thorstensen, S, Tomkins, and K. Millar. 2006. Ethical matrix manual. LEI, The Hague. http://estframe.net/ethical_bio_ta_tools_project/content_2/text_2c81d261-b7a8-43e8-8f1e-d724b43e2ba3/1346076649086/et2_manual_em_binnenwerk_45p.pdf. Accessed 12 Mar 2014.
Potter, V.R. 1970. Bioethics: science of survival. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 14: 127–153.
Prosser, C.G., C. Royle, I.R. Fleet, and T.B. Mepham. 1991. The galactopoietic effect of bovine growth hormone in goats is associated with increased concentrations of insulin-like growth factor—I in milk and mammary tissue. Journal of Endocrinology 128: 457–463.
Schroeder, D., and C. Palmer. 2003. Technology assessment and the ‘ethical matrix’. Poiesis and Praxis 1: 295–307.
Singer, P. 1972. Famine, affluence, and morality. Philosophy and Public Affairs 1: 229–243.
Thompson, P.B. 1988. Ethical issues in agriculture: The need for recognition and reconciliation. Agriculture and Human Values 5(4): 4–15.
Thompson, P.B. 2007. Food biotechnology in ethical perspective, 2nd ed. Dordrecht: Springer.
Thompson, P.B., and D.M. Kaplan. 2014. The Encyclopedia of food and agricultural ethics. Dordrecht: Springer.
Zimdahl, R.L. 1998. Ethics in weed science. Weed Science 46(6): 636–639.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Thompson, P.B. Agricultural ethics: then and now. Agric Hum Values 32, 77–85 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-014-9519-1
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-014-9519-1