Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Woman, medicine and abortion in the nineteenth century

  • Published:
Feminist Legal Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Professor Hubbard, cited in M.L. HolbrookParturition Without Pain: A Code for Escaping from the Primal Curse, (New York, 1882), 14–15.

  2. President of the British Medical Association, Withers Moore, “The Higher Education of Women”,British Medical Journal, 14th August 1889, p.295, at 299.

  3. K. Luker,Abortion and the Politics of Motherhood (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984), 16.

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. Keown,Abortion, Doctors and the Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988), 166.

    Google Scholar 

  5. For example, J. Mohr,Abortion in America: The Origins and Evolution of National Policy (New York: Oxford University Press, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Keown,supra n.4, at 159.

    Google Scholar 

  7. See C. Smith-Rosenberg and C. Rosenberg, “The Female Animal: Medical and Biological Views of Woman and Her Role in Nineteenth-Century America”,Journal of American History 60 (1973), 332. Petchesky, however, emphasises the medical role as more creative than merely affirmative: “physicians more than any other group [were] the social agents who, through their popular writings as much as their medical treatise, propagated the Victorian ideology of ‘true womanhood.’” — R.P. Petchesky,Abortion and Woman's Choice: The State, Sexuality and Reproductive Freedom (London: Verso, 1986), 82.

    Google Scholar 

  8. C. Beecher, “The Peculiar Responsibilities of American Women”, in N.F. Cott, ed.,Root of Bitterness (New York: Dutton, 1974), 173–174.

    Google Scholar 

  9. I am following Sally Sheldon in using Woman to denote a mythical social being rather than a tangible, biological reality. Woman may be translated to “therepresentation of an essence inherent in all women (which is seen as Nature, Mother Mystery ... Femininity et cetera), i.e. Woman is seen as a socially constructed rather than a biologically rooted entity.” S. Sheldon, “‘Who is the Mother to Make the Judgement?’: The Constructions of Woman in the English Abortion Law”,Feminist Legal Studies 1 (1993), 3, at n.2 (reference omitted).

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. Foucault, “On Governmentality”, inIdeology and Consciousness 6 (1979), 5–21.

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. Foucault,The History of Sexuality, Volume One (Penguin: London, 1979), 143–144.

    Google Scholar 

  12. P. Rabinow, “Artificiality and Enlightenment: From Sociobiology to Biosociality”, inIncorporations, Zones 6 (1992), 234.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Foucault,The History of Sexuality, supra n.11, at 25. (

    Google Scholar 

  14. M. Foucault,Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977, ed. C. Gordon (Brighton: Harvester Press, 1980), 58.

    Google Scholar 

  15. The phrase is Rosalyn Diprose's: see R. Diprose,The Bodies of Women: Ethics Embodiment and Sexual Difference (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  16. See Z. Eisenstein,The Female Body and the Law (London: University of California Press, 1988), 10–11; also, R. Braidotti,Nomadic Subjects: Embodiment and Sexual Difference in Contemporary Feminist Thinking (New York: Columbia, 1994), 61.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Smith-Rosenberg and Rosenberg,supra n.7, at 333.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ingleby Lectures, W.F. Wade, “On Some Functional Disorders of Females’, Lecture I,British Medical Journal, June 5th 1886, p.1053.

  19. Ingleby Lecture, W.F. Wade, “On Some Functional Disorders of Females”, Lecture II,British Medical Journal, 12th June 1886, p.1095.

  20. The Young Ladies' Book (New York, 1830), 28.

  21. F. Follet,The Diseases of Women, Their Cause and Cure Familiarly Explained (New York: T.W. Strong, 1848), 42.

    Google Scholar 

  22. G.L. Austin, quoted in B. Ehrenreich and D. English,One Hundred Years of Advise to Women (London: Pluto Press, 1979), 108.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Monograph on the uterus given by Byford, the University of Chicago's gynaecology Professor in the 1860's, cited in Douglas Wood,ibid.

  24. Foucault,Power/Knowledge, supra n.14, at 122.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Foucault,The History of Sexuality, supra n.11, at 104. (

    Google Scholar 

  26. Medical concern over education was not restricted to its effects on women. At a time of increasing working class organisation its possible liberating effect produced concern, see, for example: G. King, “Education in Parochial Schools: Its Influence on Insanity and Mental Aberration”,British Medical Journal, 14th September 1855, p.855, at 856.

  27. W. Moore, “The Higher Education of Women”,British Medical Journal, 14th August 1886, p.295, at 297.

  28. See S. Sontag,Illness as Metaphor (London: Penguin, 1991), 44.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Dr. Arabella Kenealy, quoted in Ehrenreich and English,supra n.22, at 117.

    Google Scholar 

  30. A.R. Burr,Weir Mitchell: His Life and Letters (New York: Duffield and Co., 1929), 374.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ehrenreich and English,supra n.22, at 116.

  32. J. Martin, “Injury to Health From the Present System of Public Education”,British Medical Journal, 16th February 1884, 311–312.

  33. King,supra n.26, at 856.

  34. Sir J. Crichton-Browne, “Sex in Education”,British Medical Journal, 7th May 1892, p.949 at 952–953.

  35. Moore,supra n.27, at 298.

  36. “University of London”,British Medical Journal, 16th May 1874, p.661.

  37. Moore,supra, n.27, at 296.

  38. Ehrenreich and English,supra n.22, at 116. See also Moore: “If, of the force which the parent obtains from the environment, which is consumed in its own life, little remains to be consumed in producing other lives ... Great is the physiological cost of that discipline which high mental capacity is reached.”Supra n.27, at 296.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Miss Chreiman, “The Physical Culture of Women”,British Medical Journal, 19th January 1889, p.139.

  40. W. Goodell,Lessons in Gynaecology (Philadelphia: D.G. Brinton, 1879), 353.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Moore,supra n.27, at 299.

  42. Smith-Rosenberg and Rosenberg,supra n.7, at 340.

    Google Scholar 

  43. T.S. Clouston,Female Education from a Medical Point of View (Edinburgh: 1882), 19.

  44. H. Storer,Is It I? A Book For Every Man (Boston: Lee and Shepard, 1868, photo reprint, 1974), 89–90.

    Google Scholar 

  45. H. McCormac,Moral-Sanatory Economy (London: 1853), 8.

  46. “University of London”,British Medical Journal, 16th May 1874, p.661.

  47. Goldsmid,ibid.

  48. A. Creak,ibid.

  49. The prescribed role of women in the nineteenth century appears to have been so constricting and limiting as to create a situation where disease was seen as an alternative role. Carol Smith-Rosenberg, “The Hysterical Woman: Sex Role Conflict In Nineteenth-Century America”,Social Research XXXIX (Winter 1972), 652 at 655, 678, states that: “This was a period when ... social and structural change had created stress within the family and when, in addition, individual domestic role alternatives were few and rigidly defined. From this perspective hysteria can be seen as an alternative role option for particular women unable to accept their life situation.”

    Google Scholar 

  50. Speech to the House of Commons, 7 June (1842), cited in I. Pinchbeck,Women Workers and Industrial Revolution 1750–1850 (London: Virago, 1981, 3rd ed.), 267.

    Google Scholar 

  51. “Hygiene of Female Workers”,British Medical Journal, 26th September 1884, p.578.

  52. S. Atkins and B. Hoggett,Women and the Law (Oxford: Blackwell, 1984), 12–13.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Report of the Women's Employment Committee of the Ministry of Reconstruction, Cmnd 9239 (London: HMSO, 1918).

  54. “Case of Blighted Foetus”,British Medical Journal, 3rd January 1857, p.12.

  55. “Infant Mortality and Female Labour in Factories”,British Medical Journal, 19th January 1884, p. 134.

  56. W. Stanley Jevons, “Married Women in Factories”,British Medical Journal, 14.1.1882, p.63. The primacy of female removal from the home as a cause of infant mortality was reiterated by George Reid, who claimed: “Whatever the secondary cause might be, the main cause of the increased mortality was undoubtedly the employment of women in factories.” G. Reid, “Legal Restraint Upon the Employment of Women In Factories Before and After Childbirth”,British Medical Journal, 30th July 1892, p.275 at 278.

  57. Ibid.

  58. Ibid.

  59. Jevons,supra n.56.

  60. Moore,supra n.27, at 299.

  61. Jevons,supra n.56, at 63.

  62. “The Employment of Women”,British Medical Journal, 22nd August 1863, p.224.

  63. McCormac,supra n.45, at 7.

  64. “Medical Women”,British Medical Journal, 14th October 1871, p.454.

  65. This aggression is, in a way, reflected in the combatitive language used. The opposition to women was framed in the language of warfare, for example: “The walls of our modern Jericho will not fall before the sound of a voice, however fluty or nicely modulated.” “Minerva Medica”,British Medical Journal, 23rd September 1871, p.356. Or: “The Queens University, it is anticipated will be the next to follow suit [in admitting women], and, these fortresses having surrendered at discretion, it is impossible that others can long sustain the seige.”British Medical Journal, 21st October 1876, p.537. The vocabulary, employing the words and images of fortress, seige and surrender reveal for us the insecurity, and corresponding combatitiveness, of the profession.

  66. General Council of Medical Education and Registration, “Discussion of the Admission of Women to the Medical Profession”,British Medical Journal, 3rd July 1875, p.9 at 10.

  67. “Female Physicians”,British Medical Journal, 26th July 1862, p.96.

  68. J. Hutchinson, Presidents Address, “A Review of Current Topics of Medical and Social Interest”,British Medical Journal, 9th August 1876, p.231 at 232.

  69. “The Female Doctor Question ...”,British Medical Journal, 22nd November 1862, p.537.

  70. “Medical Education for Women”,British Medical Journal, 30th April 1870, p.445.

  71. “Female Physicians”,British Medical Journal, 26th July 1862, p.96.

  72. General Council of Medical Education and Registration,supra n.66, at 16.

  73. In the course of questioning which areas of medicine a woman could manage, surgery was ruled out: “Surgery they can hardly follow; for like Rosalind, they would faint, we fancy, at the very sight of blood,” “Shall We Have Female Graduates In Medicine”,British Medical Journal, 2nd September 1856, p.653 at 654.

  74. A.H., “Mr Huthinson's Address”,British Medical Journal, 23rd September 1876, p.414.

  75. General Council of Medical Education and Registration,supra n.66, at 10.

  76. “Medical Act Amended ...”,British Medical Journal, 8th July 1867, p.65.

  77. S.W. Sibley, “Remarks on Some Current Medical Topics”,British Medical Journal, 1st September 1877, p.283.

  78. “Women Doctors”,British Medical Journal, 28th May 1870, p.559.

  79. “Female Physicians”,British Medical Journal, 26th August 1862, p.96.

  80. Ibid.

  81. H.S. Pomeroy,The Ethics of Marriage (New York: Funk and Wagnalls, 1888), 95.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Ibid., at vii.

    Google Scholar 

  83. Ibid., at 137–138.

    Google Scholar 

  84. Indeed any failure to procreate was opposed. The “Maiden” woman was not exempt from this; opposition manifesting again in bio-medical “evidence” of the ills likely to befall her. See Smith-Rosenberg and Rosenberg,supra n.7, at 336.

    Google Scholar 

  85. E.S. Chesser,Woman and Womanhood (London: Cassel, 1912), at 43.

    Google Scholar 

  86. Pomeroy,supra n.81, at 97.

    Google Scholar 

  87. L.F.E. Bergeret, “Clinical Lecture on Conjugal Onanism and Kindred Sins”,Philadelphia Medical Times, 1st February 1872, p.162.

  88. Storer,supra n.44, at 115–116.

    Google Scholar 

  89. Storer,Why Not? A Book for Every Woman (Boston: Lee and Shepard, 1866), 36.

    Google Scholar 

  90. Storer,supra n.44, at 76. See also, Geo. Steele Perkins, “The Traffic in Abortifacients”,British Medical Journal, 25th February 1899, p.506. Yet see n.84.

    Google Scholar 

  91. Storer,supra n.89, at 81.

    Google Scholar 

  92. Storer,supra n.44, at 76.

    Google Scholar 

  93. British Medical Journal, 26th September 1868, p.351.

  94. “American Opinion on Artificial Abortion”,British Medical Journal, 19th February 1870, p.189.

  95. W.L. Atlee and D.A. O'Donnell, “Report of the Committee on Criminal Abortion”,Transactions of the American Medical Association XXII (1871), 241.

    Google Scholar 

  96. Steele Perkins,supra n.90, at 596.

    Google Scholar 

  97. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  98. A. Nebinger,Criminal Abortion; Its Extent and Prevention (Philadelphia: Collins, 1876), 11. Nebinger believed women sought abortions because of the “inconvenience incident in pregnancy, fear of the pains and risks of labor; but mainly ... to avoid the labor and expense of rearing children, and the interference with pleasurable pursuits, fashions and frivolities.”Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  99. E. Hale,The Great Crime of the Nineteenth Century (Chicago: C.S. Halsey, 1867), 10.

    Google Scholar 

  100. “The Traffic in Abortifacient”,British Medical Journal, 14th January 1899, p.110 at 111.

  101. “The Traffic in Abortifacient”,British Medical Journal, 14th January 1899, p.110.

  102. “Rethinking (M)otherhood: Feminist Theory and State Regulation of Pregnancy”,Harvard Law Review 103 (1990), 1325 at 1333 (reference omitted).

  103. D.M. Reese, “Infant Mortality in Large Cities; The Sources for its Increase, And Means for its Diminution”,Transactions of the American Medical Association 10 (1857), 91 at 101–102.

    Google Scholar 

  104. D.H., “Procuring Abortion: A Physician's Reply to the Solicitations of a Married Woman to Produce a Miscarriage for Her”,Nashville Journal of Medicine and Surgery 17 (1876), 200 at 201.

    Google Scholar 

  105. B. Smart,Michel Foucault (London: Tavistock, 1985), 96.

    Google Scholar 

  106. The birth-rate of the upper classes was believed to be “about half, or even less than half” of that of other classes, “A Low Birth-Rate”,British Medical Journal, 24th September 1892, p.705.

  107. J. Matthews Duncan, “The Sterility of Women”,British Medical Journal, 24th February 1883, p.343, at 344.

  108. Between 1800 and 1900 the white fertility rate in the United States decreased by fifty percent. The number of children born to married women dropped dramatically from 7.04 to 3.56, J. Smith, “Family Limitation”, in N. Cott and E. Pleck eds.,A Heritage of Her Own (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1979), 226.

    Google Scholar 

  109. Nebinger,supra n.98, at 6–7.

    Google Scholar 

  110. A. Gardner,Conjugal Sins Against the Laws of Life and Health (New York: J.S. Redfield, Photo reprint, Harper, 1974), 5.

    Google Scholar 

  111. M.A. Pallen, “Foeticide or Criminal Abortion”,Medical Archives 3 (1869), 193 at 195.

    Google Scholar 

  112. E.S. Chesser,From Girlhood to Womanhood (London: Cassel, 1914), 122.

    Google Scholar 

  113. Mohr,supra n.5, at 167. This reflects the broader eugenic base of “race suicide” arguments: “it was aimed at the defence of the WASP establishment against rising immigration and proletarianization, a goal that would be taken on more directly by early-twentieth-century eugenicists.” Petchesky,supra n.7, at 79.

    Google Scholar 

  114. E.H. Clarke,Sex in Education: Or a Fair Chance For Girls (J.R. Osgood & Co.: Boston, 1873), 63.

    Google Scholar 

  115. T. Laqueur, “Orgasm, Generation and the Politics of Reproductive Biology”,Representations 14 (1986), 1 at 18.

    Google Scholar 

  116. See Sheldon,supra n.9.

    Google Scholar 

  117. For a discussion of this point, with particular reference to the emergence of so calledfoetal rights, see M. Thomson, “AfterRe S”,Medical Law Review 2 (1994), 127.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Birmingham University, UK

    Michael Thomson

Authors
  1. Michael Thomson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

The author would like to thank Moira Wright, Sally Sheldon and Ian Dorrington for comments and suggestions on earlier drafts of this paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thomson, M. Woman, medicine and abortion in the nineteenth century. Feminist Legal Stud 3, 159–183 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01104111

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01104111

Keywords

Search

Navigation