Skip to main content
Log in

Plant operator simulation: benefits and drawbacks for a construction training organization

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Cognition, Technology & Work Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The civil construction industry in Australia is under pressure to attract, train and retain high numbers of skilled personnel. At the same time it is recognized as one of the most dangerous industries in the country. To counteract the safety issues and the labor shortages, plant operator training augmented by simulation is being investigated as an alternative to current training methods. Construction worksites using heavy excavation and earthmoving equipment are at risk of a multitude of potentially dangerous situations. A review of the literature on simulation reveals high benefits across other areas of industry using heavy, human-operated machinery such as rail and mining. This paper presents an initial preliminary case study to investigate the benefits and drawbacks experienced in the use of simulation in a current construction training program prior to the commencement of a rigorous larger-scale study being undertaken to investigate the human factors benefits of simulator training in construction. While building and construction’s use of simulation is in its infancy, a major training provider in Australia has introduced simulation as a key feature in their training programs to attract new entrants into construction careers, enhance safety and introduce the benefits of technology to a traditional area of training. Finally, the paper discusses the research approach that will be used to assess the larger study of simulation use in construction to train heavy plant operation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ABC News (2007) Safety fears over flight simulator training. Available via http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2007/09/26/2043412.htm. Accessed 1 October 2009

  • Alavi M, Carlson P (1992) A review of MIS research and disciplinary development. J Manage Inform Sys 8:45–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowman DA, McMahan RP (2007) Virtual reality: how much immersion is enough? Computer 40:36–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bullough JD, Rea MS (2001) Forward vehicular lighting and inclement weather conditions. In: Proceedings of PAL 2001 symposium, Darmstadt University of Technology. pp 79–89. Available via http://www.utzverlag.de/buecher/31971dbl.pdf. Accessed 1 October 2009

  • Department of Industrial Relations, Department of Industrial Relations, Queensland Government (2000) Guide to safety in the civil construction industry. Available via http://www.deir.qld.gov.au/pdf/whs/construction_safetyguide2000.pdf. Accessed 1 October 2009

  • Diver P (2008) Haptic days are here again: a context for simulation in the building and construction industry. Internal report for The Construction Training Centre, Salisbury

    Google Scholar 

  • Enriquez M, Afonin O, Yager B, Maclean K (2001) A pneumatic tactile alerting system for the driving environment. In: Proceedings of the 2001 workshop on perceptive user interfaces. pp 1–7

  • Fraser L (2007) Significant developments in occupational health and safety in Australia’s Construction industry. Int J Occup Environ Health 13:12–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacob RJK, Karn KS (2005) Commentary on section 4. Eye tracking in human-computer interaction and usability research: ready to deliver the promises. Available via http://www.cs.tufts.edu/~jacob/papers/ecem.pdf. Accessed 1 October 2009

  • Li G, Hamilton I, Morrisroe G, Clarke T (2006) Driver detection and recognition of lineside signals and signs at different approach speeds. Cogn Tech Work 8:30–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas J, Thabet W (2008) Implementation and evaluation of a VR task-based training tool for conveyor belt safety training. J Inform Technol Construc 13:637–659

    Google Scholar 

  • Martrell S, Soares CG, Barnett J (2009) Application of virtual reality technologies to improve occupational and industrial safety in industrial processes. Safe Reliab Risk Anal Theory Methods Appl 4:727–731

    Google Scholar 

  • Masciocchi C, Dark V, Parkhurst D (2007) Evaluation of virtual reality snowplow simulator training. Iowa Dept of transportation technical report. Available via http://www.ctre.iastate.edu/reports/snowplow_simulator_final.pdf. Accessed 20 August 2009

  • McInerney PA (2005) Special commission of inquiry into the waterfall rail accident: final report. Office of the Governor, New South Wales State Government

  • Mohamed S (1999) Empirical investigation of construction safety management activities and performance in Australia. Saf Sci 33:129–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PuraVida (2008) Feasibility study on establishment of a plant operator simulation centre at construction training centre: where do I get the ‘x factor’ training? Internal report for The Construction training Centre, Salisbury

  • Readinger WO, Chatziastros OA, Cunningham W, Bulthoff H, Cutting JE (2002) Gaze-eccentricity effects on road position and steering. J Exp Psychol Appl 8:247–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roach GD, Dorrian J, Fletcher A, Dawson D (2001) Comparing the effects of fatigue and alcohol consumption on locomotive engineer’s performance in a rail simulator. J Hum Ergol 30:125–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruff TM (2001) Miner training simulator: user’s guide and scripting language/documentation. NIOSH. US Department of Health and Human Services., DHHS Publication No 2001-136, Pittsburg

  • Simmons-Boardman Publishing Corporation (2004) Simulating can be stimulating: virtual reality is the next best thing to putting a trainee train driver on the track. Int Railway J 44:41–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Sohn MH, Douglass SA, Chen MC, Anderson JR (2000) Eye-movements during unit-task execution in a complex problem-solving situation. In: Proceedings of the 44th annual meeting of the human factors and ergonomics society. pp 378–381

  • Stothard PM, Galbin JM, Fowler JCW (2004) Development, demonstration, and implementation of a virtual reality simulation capability for coal mining operations. In: Proceedings ICCR Conference, Beijing

  • Strayer DL, Drews FA, Burns S (2004) The development and evaluation of a high-fidelity simulator training program for snowplow operators. Utah Department of Transportation Report UT-04.17

  • Victor TW, Harbluk JL, Engstrom JA (2005) Sensitivity of eye-movement measures to in-vehicle task difficulty. Trans Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav 8:167–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin RK (2002) Case study research, design & methods, 3rd edn. Sage, Newbury Park

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jennifer Tichon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tichon, J., Diver, P. Plant operator simulation: benefits and drawbacks for a construction training organization. Cogn Tech Work 12, 219–229 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-010-0140-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-010-0140-9

Keywords

Navigation