Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Subjunctive conditionals: Two parameters vs. three

  • Published:
Philosophical Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Blue, N. A.: 1981, ‘A metalinguistic interpretation of counterfactual conditionals’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, pp. 179–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chisholm, Roderick M.: 1955, ‘Law statements and counterfactual inference’, Analysis 15, pp. 97–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, Kit: 1975, Critical notice of Lewis (1973), Mind 84, pp. 451–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, Nelson: 1947, ‘The problem of counterfactual conditionals’, Journal of Philosophy 44, pp. 113–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, Frank: 1977, ‘A causal theory of counterfactuals’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 55, pp. 3–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howson, Colin and Oddie, Graham: 1979, ‘Miller's so-called paradox of information’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 30, pp. 253–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kratzer, Angelika: 1981, ‘Partition and revision: the semantics of counterfactuals’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, pp. 201–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, David: 1973, Counterfactuals (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, David: 1979, ‘Counterfactual dependence and time's arrow’, Noûs 13, pp. 455–475.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, John Stuart: 1868, System of Logic (Longmans, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, John L.: 1976, Subjunctive Reasoning (D. Reidel, Dordrecht).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, John L.: 1981, ‘A refined theory of counterfactuals’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, pp. 239–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey, F. P.: 1931, ‘General propositions and causality’, in The Foundations of Mathematics (Humanities, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tichý, Pavel: 1976, ‘A counterexample to the Stalnaker-Lewis analysis of counterfactuals’, Philosophical Studies 29, pp. 271 -273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tichý, Pavel: 1978, ‘A new theory of subjunctive conditionals’, Synthese 37, pp. 433–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tichý, Pavel: 1980a, ‘The logic of temporal discourse’, Linguistics and Philosophy 3, pp. 343–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tichý, Pavel: 1980b, ‘The semantics of episodic verbs’, Theoretical Linguistics 7, pp. 263–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters, R. S.: 1961, ‘The problem of counterfactuals’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 39, pp. 30–46.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Philosophy, University of Otago, Box 56, Dunedin, New Zealand

    Pavel Tichý

Authors
  1. Pavel Tichý
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tichý, P. Subjunctive conditionals: Two parameters vs. three. Philos Stud 45, 147–179 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00372476

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00372476

Keywords

Search

Navigation