Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The logic of temporal discourse

  • Published:
Linguistics and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Åqvist, Lennart, ‘Formal Semantics for Verb Tenses as Analyzed by Reichenbach’, in T.A. van Dijk (ed.), Pragmatics of Language (Amsterdam, 1976).

  2. Bäuerle, Rainer, ‘Tempus, Adverb, temporale Frage’ in Maria-Elisabeth Conte et al. (eds.), Wortstellung und Bedeutung (Tübingen, 1978).

  3. BäuerleRainer, ‘Tense Logics and Natural Language’, Synthese 40 (1979), 225–30.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cresswell, M.J., ‘Interval Semantics and Logical Words’ in Ch. Rohrer (ed.), On the Logical Analysis of Tense and Aspect (Tübingen, 1977).

  5. Duncan-JonesA., ‘Fugitive Propositions’, Analysis 10 (1949), 21–23.

    Google Scholar 

  6. FiskM., ‘A Pragmatic Account of Tenses’, American Philosophical Quarterly 8 (1971), 93–98.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Guenthner, Franz, ‘Remarks on the Present Perfect in English’ in Ch. Rohrer (ed.), On the Logical Analysis of Tense and Aspect (Tübingen, 1977).

  8. Jespersen, O., A Modern English Grammar, Part IV (London 1931).

  9. Leech, G.N., Towards a Semantic Description of English (London, 1969).

  10. Lyons, J., Semantics, Vol. 1 (Cambridge, 1977).

  11. McCawley, J.D., ‘Tense and Time Reference in English’ in Fillmore and Langendoen (eds.), Studies in Linguistic Semantics (New York, 1971).

  12. Prior, A.N., Time and Modality (Oxford, 1957).

  13. PriorA.N., ‘Tense Logic and the Continuity of Time’, Studia Logica 8 (1962) 133–48.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Quirk, R. et al., A Grammar of Contemporary English (London, 1972).

  15. Reichenbach, H., Elements of Symbolic Logic (New York, 1947).

  16. Rescher, N. and Urquhart A., Temporal Logic (Vienna and New York, 1971).

  17. RussellB., Review of Symbolic Logic and Its Applications by Hugh MacColl, Mind 15 (1906) 256–7.

    Google Scholar 

  18. SegerbergK., ‘On the Logic of Tomorrow’, Theoria 33 (1967) 45–52.

    Google Scholar 

  19. TichýP., ‘An Approach to Intensional Analysis’, Nous 5 (1971) 273–98.

    Google Scholar 

  20. TichýP., ‘What Do We Talk About?’, Philosophy of Science 42 (1975) 80–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. TichýP., ‘A New Theory of Subjunctive Conditionals’, Synthese 37 (1978) 433–57.

    Google Scholar 

  22. TichýP., ‘De Re and De Dicto’, Philosophia 8 (1978) 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  23. TichýP., ‘Questions, Answers, and Logic’, American Philosophical Quarterly 15 (1978) 275–284.

    Google Scholar 

  24. TichýP., ‘Two Kinds of Intensional Logic’ Epistemologia 1 (1978) 143–64.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Pavel Tichý
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tichý, P. The logic of temporal discourse. Linguistics and Philosophy 3, 343–369 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00401690

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00401690

Keywords

Search

Navigation