This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
REFERENCES
Dreyfus, G. (1992). ‘Universals in Indo-Tibetan Buddhism’, in S. Ihara and Z. Yamaguchi (ed.), Tibetan Studies, Vol. 1, pp. 29–46. Narita.
Dreyfus, G. (1997). Recognizing Reality. Dharmakīrti's Philosophy and its Tibetan Interpretations. Albany, N.Y.: State University of New York Press.
Hopkins, J. (1989). ‘A Tibetan Delineation of Different Views of Emptiness in the Indian Middle Way School’, The Tibet Journal 1: 10–43.
Ichigŋ, M. (1985). Madhyamakālamkāra of Śāntarakāita with his own commentary or Vrtti and with the subcommentary or Panjikāof Kamalaīla. Kyoto: Buneidŋ.
Kajiyama, Y. (1973). ‘Three Kinds of Affirmation and Two Kinds of Negation in Buddhist Philosophy’, Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde Südasiens 17: 161–175.
Katsura, S. (1992). ‘Dignāga and Dharmakīrti on adarīanamītra and anupalabdhi’, Asiatische Studien/Etudes asiatiques 46(1): 222–231.
Kitagawa, H. (1972). Indo Koten Ronrigaku no Kenkyu. Jinna no Taikei. Tokyo.
Klein, A.C. (1991). Knowing, Naming and Negation. A Sourcebook on Tibetan Sautrāntika. Ithaca, N.Y.: Snow Lion Publications.
Kobayashi, M. (1989). ‘The Mādhyamika Argument for nih svabhavat a and the Fallacy of a#x015B;ray asiddha: Kamalaśila's View in His Madhyamak aloka’, Bunka 50(3): 218–199 (in Japanese with comprehensive English summary).
Lopez, D. (1987). A Study of Sv atantrika. Ithaca, N.Y.: Snow Lion Publications.
Lopez, D. (1988). The Heart Sutra Explained: Indian and Tibetan Commentaries. Albany, N.Y.: State University of New York Press.
Matilal, B. (1970). ‘Reference and Existence in Nyaya and Buddhist Logic’, Journal of Indian Philosophy 1: 83–110.
Mimaki, K. (1976). La Réfutation bouddhique de la permanence des choses (sthirasiddhidusana) et la preuve de la momentanéitédes choses (ksanabhangasiddhi). Paris: Publications de l'institut de civilisation indienne, fascicule 41.
Mimaki, K. (1982). Blo gsal sgrub mtha'. Kyoto: Zinbun Kagaku Kenkyusyo.
Tillemans, T. (1984). ‘Two Tibetan Texts on the “Neither One nor Many” Argument for śunyat a’, Journal of Indian Philosophy 12: 357–388.
Tillemans, T. (1990). Materials for the Study of Aryadeva, Dharmap ala and Candrakirti. The Catuh śataka of Aryadeva, chapters XII and XIII, with the commentaries of Dharmap ala and Candrakirti: Introduction, Translation, Sanskrit, Tibetan and Chinese Texts, Notes. Wiener Studien zur Tibetologie und Buddhismuskunde 24(1) and 24(2). Vienna: Arbeitskreis für Tibetische und Buddhistische Studien Universität Wien.
Tillemans, T. (1992). ‘Tsong kha pa et al. on the Bhavaviveka-Candrakirti Debate’, in S. Ihara and Z. Yamaguchi (ed.), Tibetan Studies, Vol. 1, pp. 315–326. Narita.
Tillemans, T. (1993). Persons of Authority. The sTon pa tshad ma'i skyes bur sgrub pa'i gtam of A lag sha Ngag dbang bstan dar, A Tibetan Work on the Central Religious Questions in Buddhist Epistemology. Tibetan and Indo-Tibetan Studies 5. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.
Tillemans, T. (1995). ‘On the So-called Difficult Point of the apoha Theory’, Asiatische Studien/Etudes asiatiques 49(4): 853–889.
Tillemans, T. and T. Tomabechi (1995). ‘—Le dBu ma'i byuntshul de Śakya mchog ldan’, Asiatische Studien/Etudes asiatiques 49(4): 891–918.
Yoshimizu, Ch. (1997). ‘Tson kha pa on don byed nus pa’, in H. Krasser et al. (ed.) Tibetan Studies, Vol. 2, pp. 1103–1120. Vienna: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.
Yotsuya, K. (1995). ‘An Introduction to the “Svatantra-reasoning”’, Sotoshu kenkyuin kenkyukiyo 22: 1–28.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tillemans, T.J., Lopez, D.S. What Can One Reasonably Say About Nonexistence? a Tibetan Work on the Problem of Āśrayāsiddha. Journal of Indian Philosophy 26, 99–129 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004284112273
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004284112273