Abstract
Pauline Kleingeld’s “Contradiction and Kant’s Formula of Universal Law”, published in this journal in 2017, presents a powerful challenge to what has become the standard (‘practical’) reconstruction of the categorical imperative. In this response to Kleingeld, I argue that she is right to emphasise the ‘simultaneity requirement’ - that we must be able to will a proposed maxim and ‘simulataneously’, ‘also’ or ‘at the same time’ the maxim in its universalised form - but I deny that this removes the categorical imperative test from the world of universalisation because the agent must be understood as part of that world. There are two distinct types of conflict: a contradiction that results from non-universalisability and Kleingeld’s ‘volitional’ conflict, located within the will of the immoral agent. The standard ‘practical’ reconstruction of the categorical imperative remains largely intact.
References
Glasgow, Joshua (2003): “Expanding the Limits of Universalization: Kant’s Duties and Kantian Moral Deliberations.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 33, 23-48.10.1080/00455091.2003.10716534Search in Google Scholar
Kleingeld, Pauline (2017): “Contradiction and Kant’s Formula of Universal Law.” Kant-Studien 108, 89-115.10.1515/kant-2017-0006Search in Google Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine (1996): “Kant’s Formula of Universal Law.” In Creating the Kingdom of Ends, 77-105. Cambridge. First published in 1985.10.1017/CBO9781139174503.004Search in Google Scholar
O’Neill, Onora (1989): “Consistency in Action.” In Constructions of Reason, 81-104. Cambridge. First published in 1985.Search in Google Scholar
O’Neill, Onora (2013). Acting on Principle: An Essay on Kantian Ethics. Second edition. Cambridge. First edition 1975.10.1017/CBO9781139565097Search in Google Scholar
Timmermann, Jens (2007): Kant’s “Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals”: A Commentary. Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9780511487316Search in Google Scholar
Timmermann, Jens (2018): “Emerging Autonomy: Dealing with the Inadequacies of the ‘Canon of Pure Reason’ (1781).” In The Emergence of Autonomy in Kant’s Moral Philosophy. Ed. by Stefano Bacin and Oliver Sensen. Cambridge.10.1017/9781316863435.007Search in Google Scholar
© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
