Conclusions
Using the definition of “education as a practice”, the only coherent interpretation of Heslep's central thesis of “Education's moral role” was found to need the notion of a “social institution” of Education. This in turn made sense only by positing a notion such as a Political Proficiency Certificate, with its concomitant drastic government intervention. Heslep himself did not suggest this, presumably because he saw the tension that would appear between such an institution and the voluntary actions of citizens. This tension was then shown to exist even in his notion of the “public interest”, which brought into question his argument of why Education needs to be standardized. This was reinforced by the realisation that, if the “public interest” required votes to be aggregated into a social choice, then it is unlikely to be realised by any current voting system. This suggested it was an unsuitable foundation on which to rest either a theory of democracy or a justification for the need for standardized Education. With that justification brought into question, the need for a “social institution” of Education disappears; without that, as we have said, Heslep's central thesis is without a coherent interpretation.
References
Berlin, I.: 1969, Four Essays on Liberty, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Dummett M.: 1984, Voting Procedures, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Gewirth, A.: 1978, Reason and Morality, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Heslep, R.D.: 1989, Education in Democracy, Iowa State University Press, Ames.
Peters, R.S.: 1970, Ethics and Education, George Allen & Unwin Ltd, London.
Riker, W.: 1982, Liberalism Against Populism, WH Freeman, San Francisco.
Tooley, J.: 1991, ‘Social Choice Theory and Philosophy of Education’, Papers of the Celebration Conference, Philosophy of Education Society of Great Britain.
Tooley J.: 1990, ‘Education Adequate for Participation in a Democracy’, Papers of the Annual Conference Philosophy of Education Society of Great Britain.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tooley, J., Heslep, R.D. Review article. Stud Philos Educ 12, 257–265 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00468849
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00468849