Abstract
Many modern discussions on Vocational education and Training (VET) only consider it’s goals in terms of the labor market or social inclusion. This article argues that vocations are an important contribution to the common good of society as whole, and not only a method of securing laborers. In order to acknowledge this contribution there needs to be a reorientation on VET from an educational perspective first and foremost. In order to do this, this article revisits a public debate John Dewey had with two early educational reformers David Snedden and Charles Prosser in the early twentieth century. In this debate, the economic arguments used by Snedden and Prosser, which have found their echoes in the modern VET debates were opposed to the educational arguments of Dewey. This article wishes to show the significant educational nature of Dewey’s counter arguments and argue for the relevance of this approach in the modern VET discussion.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Our perspective is mostly informed by the European conditions of VET, yet the same debates can easily be identified in other national and international perspectives too (e.g. UNESCO 2022).
In our definition of what education is and should aim for we follow the Australian pedagogue Stephen Kemmis: ‘Education, properly speaking, is the process by which children, young people and adults are initiated into forms of understanding, modes of action and ways of relating to one another and the world that foster (respectively) individual and collective self-expression, individual and collective self-development, and individual and collective self- determination, and that are, in these senses, oriented towards the good for each person and the good for humankind’ (Kemmis et al. 2014, 26). In other words, education for a common good. We will use education instead of schooling as that is talking about the system of education (and thus not the education itself) or training, which implies specifically teaching students specific skills needed for a certain task. While these forms of learning can be valuable, as shall become clear, they are not necessarily educational.
In this article we approach the common good as a continuous process in the making. By this we mean that there can be no a priori definitions what this common good looks like as that which defines our common good is constantly changing. That being said, it is a concept that grows from our shared concern with the question: What does it mean to live well together? In this way, it also fosters solidarity as people have a shared concern with this question. However, what we see in VET now is that the definition of common good is very often already defined as getting and keeping a job in the labour market. Furthermore, there are no discussions with students or workers about what it means to have a contribution from any specific vocation to our common world. As we shall discuss later in this article, this ignores the actual educational dimension of vocational education.
It was the lack of manual workers that these programs produced that lead to the dissatisfaction that eventually created a bipartisan coalition which demanded “real vocational education” and a ‘trade training undiluted by symbolic moralism about the regenerative effects of craftmanship.’ (Kett 2017, 510).
This argument that VET is for the “unsuitables” both in intellectual and social sense is in line with Snedden and Prosser and we see this as a hidden assumption in policy documents, such as publications by UNESCO (2022). Furthermore, one of the main things Dewey feared from the ratification of the Smith-Hughes Act was the collapse of the egalitarian school system in favour of a narrow conception of vocational education (Becker 1980).
Fittingly for the observations in this article, this term was actively used in a popular sense by the economist Kenneth Arrow (e.g. Arrow 1971).
In Art as Experience (1934) this is exactly the question Dewey asks and answers.
Present in both time and present in direct interaction from the vocation.
And authors such as Ingold have already argued in extension that this is not an issue as new skills will eventually pop up around the new technology through the vocations themselves. In other words, the vocations might change but will not be “deskilled” unless we stop intelligently habituating them and using them to engage with our world (Ingold 2000).
References
Arrow, Kenneth Joseph. 1971. The economic implications of learning by doing. Readings in the Theory of Growth. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1954-5.
Becker, Richard J. 1980. What are the objectives of vocational education? The Phi Delta Kappan 61 (8): 534–536.
Billet, Stephen. 2011. Vocational education: purposes traditions and prospects. Cham: Springer.
Cohen, Sol. 1968. The industrial education movement, 1906–17. American Quarterly 20 (1): 95–110. https://doi.org/10.2307/2710993.
Commission, European. 2022. Vocational education and training: skills for today and for the future. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
Council of the European Union. 2020. On vocational education and training (VET) for sustainable competitiveness, social fairness and resilience. Recommendation, 2020.
Cremin, Lawrence A. 1961. The transformation of the school: progressivism in American education 1876–1975. British Journal of Educational Studies. 10 (1): 106.
DeFalco, A. 1992. Dewey and vocational education: Still timely? Review of Research in Education 18: 335–381.
DeFalco, Anthony. 2010. An analysis of John Dewey’s notion of occupations: still pedagogically valuable? Education and Culture 26 (1): 82–99. https://doi.org/10.1353/eac.0.0052.
Dewey, John. 1915a. Education versus trade-training-Dr. Dewey’s reply in two communications. Curriculum Inquiry 1977: 37–39. https://doi.org/10.2307/1179397.
Dewey, John. 1915. A policy of industrial education. in on industrial education. Curriculum Inquiry 1977: 53–56. https://doi.org/10.2307/1179399.
Dewey, John. 1915. Industrial education - a wrong kind in on industrial education. Curriculum Inquiry 1977: 56–60. https://doi.org/10.2307/1179399.
Dewey, John. 1916. Democracy and education: an introduction to the philosophy of education. New York: MacMillan.
Dewey, John. 1934. Art as experience, 1954. New York: Capricorn books.
Drost, Walter H. 1977. Social efficiency reexamined: The Dewey-Snedden controversy. Curriculum inquiry 7 (1): 19–32. https://doi.org/10.2307/1179396.
Frissell, Hollis B. 1915. The value of industrial education. International Review of Mission 4 (3): 420–431. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1758-6631.1915.tb00792.x.
Fuller, Alison. 2015. Vocational education. International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences 25: 232–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.92091-9.
Gogolin, Ingrid. 2011. The Challenge of Super Diversity for Education in Europe. Education Inquiry 2 (2): 239–249. https://doi.org/10.3402/edui.v2i2.21976.
Gonon, Philipp. 2009. ‘Efficiency’and ‘vocationalism’as structuring principles of industrial education in the USA. Vocations and Learning 2 (2): 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-008-9016-z.
Guile, David, and Lorna Unwin. 2019. The Wiley handbook of vocational education and training. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119098713.
Hess, Juliet, and Deborah Bradley. 2020. Dewey’s theory of experience, traumatic memory, and music education. Studies in Philosophy of Education 39: 429–446. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-020-09706-z.
Higgins, Cristopher. 2005. Dewey’s conception on vocation: existential, aesthetic, and educational implications for teachers. Journal of Curriculum Studies 37 (4): 441–464. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220270500048502.
Hook, Sidney. 1971. John Dewey and his betrayers. The Magazine of Higher Learning 3 (7): 22–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091383.1971.10568061.
Hyslop-Margison, Emery J. 1999. An assessment of the historical arguments in vocational education reform. https://doi.org/10.21061/jcte.v17i1.590.
Ingold, Tim. 2000. The perception of the environment: essays on livelihood, dwelling and skill. New Tork: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003196662.
Ingold, Tim. 2017. Anthropology and/as education. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315227191.
Ingold, T. 2018. Five questions of skill. Cultural Geographies 25 (1): 159–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474474017702514.
Kemmis, Stephen, Jane Wilkinson, Christine Edwards-Groves, Ian Hardy, Peter Grootenboer, and Laurette Bristol. 2014. Praxis, practice and practice architectures. In Changing practices, changing education, 25–41. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4560-47-4_2
Kett, Joseph F. 2017. “Theory run mad”: John Dewey and “real” vocational education. The Journal of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era 16 (4): 500–514. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1537781417000366.
Labaree, David F. 2010. How dewey lost: the victory of david snedden and social efficiency in the reform of american education. In Pragmatism and modernities, ed. Daniel Tröhler, Thomas Schlag, and Fritz Osterwalder, 163–188. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789460913457_011.
Lauzon, Glenn P., ed. 2018. Educating a working society: vocationalism, the smith-hughes act, and modern america. Gujarat: IAP.
Levin, Robert A. 1991. The debate over schooling: influences of dewey and thorndike. Childhood Education 68 (2): 71–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/00094056.1991.10520856.
Maximilian, Krötz., and Deutscher Viola. 2022. Drop-out in dual VET: why we should consider the drop-out direction when analysing drop-out. Empirical Research in Vocational Education and Training 14 (1): 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40461-021-00127-x.
McGrath, Simon. 2012. Vocational education and training for development: A policy in need of a theory? International Journal of Educational Development 32 (5): 623–631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2011.12.001.
McGrath, Simon, and Lesley Powell. 2016. Skills for sustainable development: transforming vocational education and training beyond 2015. International Journal of Educational Development 50: 12–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2016.05.006.
Moore, Gary. 2017. The Smith-Hughes act: the road to it and what it accomplished. Techniques Magazine 92 (1): 17–21.
Nilsson, Anders. 2010. Vocational education and training–an engine for economic growth and a vehicle for social inclusion? International Journal of Training and Development 14 (4): 251–272. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2419.2010.00357.x.
OECD. 2010. Learning for jobs OECD reviews of vocational education and training. Austria: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264087460-en.
OECD. 2022. Pathways to professions: understanding higher vocational and professional tertiary education systems. OECD reviews of vocational education and training. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/a81152f4-en.
Oosterlynck, Stijn, Maarten Loopmans, Nick Schuermans, Joke Vandenabeele, and Sami Zemni. 2016. Putting flesh to the bone: looking for solidarity in diversity, here and now. Ethnic and Racial Studies 39 (5): 764–782. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2015.1080380.
Pilz, Matthias. 2012. The future of vocational education and training in a changing world. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-18757-0.
Power, Emma, Ilan Wiesel, and Kathleen Mee. 2022. Shadow care infrastructures: Sustaining life in post-welfare cities. Progress in Human Geography 1165–1184. https://doi.org/10.1177/03091325221109837
Raffe, David. 2008. The concept of transition system. Journal of Education and Work. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080802360952.
Reed, Kirk, Clare Hocking, and Liz Smythe. 2010. The interconnected meanings of occupation: the call, being-with, possibilities. Journal of Occupational Science 17 (3): 140–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2010.9686688.
Rømer, Thomas Aastrup. 2012. Imagination and judgement in john Dewey’s philosophy: intelligent transactions in a democratic context. Educational Philosophy and Theory. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2009.00623.x.
Rømer, T.A. 2013. Nature, education and things. Studies in Philosophy and Education 32: 641–652. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-013-9359-2.
Rømer, T.A. 2015. Thought and action in education. Educational Philosophy and Theory 47 (3): 260–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2013.860368.
Sandel, Michael J. 2020. The tyranny of merit: What’s become of the common good? UK: Penguin.
Sikandar, Aliya. 2015. John Dewey and his philosophy of education. Journal of Education and Educational Development. https://doi.org/10.22555/joeed.v2i2.446.
Snedden, David. 1914. Fundamental distinctions between liberal and vocational education. In Curriculum Inquiry 1977: 41–52. https://doi.org/10.2307/1179398.
Snedden, David. 1915. Vocational education in two communications. Curriculum Inquiry 1977: 33–37. https://doi.org/10.2307/1179397.
UNESCO. 2022. Transforming technical and vocational education and training for successful and just transitions: UNESCO strategy 2022–2029. Paris: UNESCO.
Williams, John. 2020. Pedagogical approaches to vocational education. In Pedagogy for technology education in secondary schools: researched informed perspectives for classroom teachers, ed. John Williams and David Barlex, 267–282. Cham: Springer.
Winch, Christopher Andrew. 2017. Work, play and learning: on chapter 15: play and work in the curriculum”. In John Dewey’s democracy and education: a centennial handbook, ed. Leonard Waks and Andrea English, 137–145. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wirth, Arthur. 1972a. Education in the technological society: the vocational liberal controversy in the early twentieth-century. Scranton: Intext Educational Publishers.
Wirth, A.G. 1972. Charles A. Prosser and the Smith-Hughes act. The Educational Forum 36 (3): 365–371.
Wirth, A.G. 1975. Historical and social contex of career education. Journal of Career Education 2 (2): 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/089484537500200202.
Zembylas, Michalinos. 2021. Dewey’s account of habit through the lens of affect theory. Educational Theory. https://doi.org/10.1111/edth.12505.
Acknowledgements
The authors have written this article while funded by the SOLiDi Program: SOLiDi has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie Grant Agreement No 956919.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
All authors have no conflicting interests to disclose.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Torenbosch, J.A., Vandenabeele, J. John Dewey, Smith-Hughes, and Vocational Education: A New Impetus for an Old Discussion. Stud Philos Educ 42, 617–632 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-023-09899-z
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-023-09899-z