Abstract
One of the major concerns of advocates of common morality is that respect for cultural diversity may result in moral relativism. On their part, proponents of culturally responsive bioethics are concerned that common morality may result in moral imperialism because of the asymmetry of power in the world. It is in this context that critics argue that global bioethics is impossible because of the difficulties to address these two theoretical concerns. In this paper, I argue that global bioethics is possible if we adopt a culturally responsive and self-critical attitude towards our moral values and those of others. I use the example of women’s reproductive autonomy in indigenous African culture to show that the difference between the leading Euro-American and indigenous African construal of autonomy is that the former ascribes greater weight on individual self-determination while the latter emphasizes responsibilities towards the community. One develops dignity in virtue of their capacity for communing with others. Hence, women have rights, but as members of the community, they also have obligations including the duty to procreate. The involvement of the family in reproductive decisions does not contravene women’s dignity and human rights. In applying the principle of autonomy in this communitarian context, one has to be sensitive to these ontological and moral specificities. The aim of global bioethics should not be to reach common grounds at all costs; any common norms should be the result of a negotiated democratic dialogue between cultures and not the result of imposition by the preponderant culture(s).
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alora, A.T., and J.M. Lumitao (eds.). 2001a. Beyond a Western Bioethics: Voices from the Developing World, 3–19. Georgetown University Press: Washington, DC.
Alora, A.T., and Lumitao J.M. (eds.). 2001b. An Introduction to an Authentically Non-Western Bioethics. In Angeles.
Andorno, R. 2007. Global Bioethics at UNESCO: in Defence of the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights. Journal of medical Ethics 33: 150–154.
Bracanovic, T. 2011. Respect for Cultural Diversity in Bioethics. Empirical, Conceptual and Normative Constraints. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 14: 229–236.
Bracanovic, T. 2013. Against Culturally Sensitive Bioethics. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 16 (4): 647–652.
Beauchamp, T.L., and J.F. Childress. 2009. Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 6th ed. Oxford University Press: New York.
Carese, J.A., and J. Sugarman. 2006. The Inescapable Relevance of Bioethics for the Practicing Clinician. Chest 130: 1864–1872.
Chattopadhyay, S., and R. De Vries. 2008. Bioethical Concerns are Global, Bioethics is Western. Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics 18 (4): 106–109.
Chattopadhyay, S., and R. De Vries. 2013. Respect for Cultural Diversity in Bioethics is an Ethical Imperative. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 16 (4): 639–645.
Dawson, A., and E. Garrard. 2006. In Defence of Moral Imperialism: Four equal and Universal Prima Facie Principles. Journal of Medical Ethics 32: 200–204.
De Vries, R., and L. Rott. 2011. Bioethics as Missionary Work: The Export of Western Ethics to Developing Countries. In Bioethics Around the Globe, ed. C. Myser. New York: Oxford University Press.
Donelly, J. 2006. The Relative Universality of Human Rights (Revised). Human Rights & Human Welfare. Working Paper 33. https://www.du.edu/gsis/hrhw/working/2006/33-donnelly-2006-rev.pdf.
Fox, R., and J. Swazey. 2010. Guest Editorial: “Ignoring the Social and Cultural Context of Bioethics Is Unacceptable”. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 19: 278–281.
Garrafa, V., and C. Lorenzo. 2008. Moral Imperialism and Multi-centric Clinical Trials in Peripheral Countries. Cadernos de Saúde Pública 24 (10): 2219–2226.
Gillon, R. 2003. Ethics Needs Principles—Four can Encompass the Rest—And Respect for Autonomy should be “first among equals”. Journal of Medical Ethics 29: 307–312.
Habermas, J. 1984. The Theory of Communicative Action, Volume, translated by Thomas McCarthy. Boston: Beacon Press.
Habermas, J. 1993. Justification and Application: Remarks on Discourse Ethics, translated by Ciaran Cronin. Massachusetts: MIT.
Habermas, J. 1995. Reconciliation through the Public Use of Reason: Remarks on John Rawls’s Political Liberalism. Journal of Philosophy XCII (3): 117–118.
Hellsten, K.S. 2008. Global Bioethics: Utopia or Reality. Developing World Bioethics 8 (2): 70–81.
Ikuenobe, P. 2018. Human Rights, Personhood, Dignity, and African Communalism. Journal of Human Rights 17 (5): 589–604.
Isreal, M. 2017. Ethical Imperialism? Exporting Research Ethics to the global South. In The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research Ethics, ed. R. Iphofen and M. Tolich. London: Sage.
Macklin, R. 1999. Against Relativism: Cultural Diversity and the Search for Ethical Universalism in Medicine. New York: Oxford University Press.
Macklin, R. 2014. Respect for Cultural Diversity and Pluralism. In A Handbook of Global Bioethics, ed. ten Have, H.A.M.J., and B. Gordijn. New York: Springer.
Metz, T. 2010. Human Dignity, Capital Punishment, and an African Moral Theory: Toward a New Philosophy of Human Rights. Journal of Human Rights 9: 81–99.
Metz, T. 2011. Ubuntu as a Moral Theory and Human Rights in South Africa. African Human Right Law Journal 11: 532–559.
Polisi, C. 2004. Universal Rights and Cultural Relativism: Hinduism and Islam Deconstructed. World Affairs 167 (1): 41–46.
Potter, V.R. 1988. Global Bioethics: Building on the Leopold legacy. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.
Potter, V.R., and L. Potter. 1995. Global Bioethics: Converting Sustainable Development to Global Survival. Medicine and Global Survival 2 (3): 185–191.
Potter, V.R., and P.J. Whitehouse. 1998. Deep and Global Bioethics for a Livable Third Millennium. The Scientist 12 (1): 9.
Quintelier, K.J.P., and D. De Smet. 2013. The Moral Universalism-Relativism Debate. Klesis—Revue philosophique 27: 211–262.
Rachels, J. 1999. The Elements of Moral Philosophy. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Roudometof, V. 2015. The Glocal and Global Studies. Globalizations 12 (5): 774–787.
Shahvisi, A. 2018. Moral Imperialism in Global Health: Trump’s Global Gag Rule. https://corbissussex.org/moral-imperialism-in-global-health-trumps-global-gag-rule/. Accessed 01 April 2019.
Tangwa, G.B. 2011. Elements of African Bioethics in a Western Frame. Bamenda, Mankon: Langaa Research and Publishing CIG.
Ten Have, H.M. 2013. Global Bioethics: Transnational Experiences and Islamic Bioethics. Zygon 48 (3): 600–617.
Ten Have, H.M. 2016. Global Bioethics: An Introduction. London: Routledge.
Tong, R. 2001. Is a Global Bioethics Possible as Well as Desirable? A Millenial Feminist Response. In Globalisng Feminist Bioethics: A Crosscultural Perspective, ed. Gwen Anderson and Aida Santos, 27–35. Boulder: Westview Press.
UNESCO. 2009. Introduction. In Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights, ed. Have ten, H.M., and M.S. Jean. Paris: UNESCO.
Widdows, H. 2007. Is Global Ethics Moral Neo-colonialism? An Investigation of the Issue in the Context of Bioethics. Bioethics 21 (6): 305–315.
Westercott, E. 2018. Moral Relativism. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy: A Peer-Reviewed Academic Resource. htHave tps://www.iep.utm.edu/moral-re/. Accessed 17 November 2018.
Wiredu, K. 1996. Cultural Universals and Particulars: An African Perspective. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tosam, M.J. Global bioethics and respect for cultural diversity: how do we avoid moral relativism and moral imperialism?. Med Health Care and Philos 23, 611–620 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-020-09972-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-020-09972-1