Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Fighting Sectional Interests in Health Care

  • Published:
Health Care Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the 1970s policy making in the Netherlands took place in sectoral networks, consisting of professional interest groups and like minded civil servants, advisory councils, mp’s and departmental ministers. In this article the author examines whether such a sectoral policy network still exists in Dutch health care by comparing past and present data on the background of civil servants, mp’s and departmental ministers. Next she describes the political fight against the health care sectoral network, which has gone on for decades. She concludes that the health care sectoral network has been severely weakened, although it remains to be seen whether this will lead to a substantial reduction of health care costs, which was one of the main reasons why politicians fought against sectoral interests in the first place.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andeweg, R.B. (1995) Beleidsvorming, In V.D. Berg (Ed.), Inleiding Staatkunde (pp. 355–370). Deventer: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bekke, H., and De Vries, J. (2001) De Ontpoldering Van de Nederlandse Landbouw. Garant: Leuven/Apeldoorn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boot, J.M., and Knapen, M.H.J.M. (2001) De Nederlandse Gezondheidszorg. Utrecht: Het Spectrum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bovens, M., ‘t Hart, P., and Peters, B.G. (2001) Analysing Governance Success and Failure in Six European States, In M.A.P. Bovens, P. ‘t Hart, and B. Guy Peters (Eds.), Success and Failure in Public Governance (pp. 12–26). Edward Elgar, Cheltenham/Northampton.

  • Daalder, H. (1993) Van Oude en Nieuwe Regenten, of: Politiek als Beroep, Afscheidsrede UL.

  • Freidson, E. (2001), Professionalism: The Third Logic. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • ’t Hart, P., Wille, A., et al. (2002) Politiek-ambtelijke Verhoudingen in Beweging, Amsterdam: Boom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kavanagh, D., and Richards, D. (2001) Departmentalism and Joined-Up Government. Parliamentary Affairs 54 (1), pp. 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kickert, W.J.M. (2002) Verhalen Van Verandering. Sociale Reconstructie Van Reorganisaties op de Ministeries Van Justitie, Landbouw, Natuurbeheer en Visserij, Onderwijs, Cultuur en Wetenschappen, Volksgezondheid, Welzijn en Sport, Den Haag: Elsevier.

  • Klijn, E.H. (1992) Policy Communities, Subsystems and Networks. An Examination and Reformulation of Some Concepts for Analyzing Complex Policy Processes, Working Paper.

  • Klijn, E.H. (1994) Policy Networks. An Overview. Theoretical Background and Main Characteristics of the Network Approach, Working Paper.

  • Kuipers, S. (2004) Cast in Concrete? The Institutional Dynamics of Belgian and Dutch Social Policy Reform, Diss. UL.

  • Marsh, D. (Ed.) (1998) Comparing Policy Networks. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, S. (1973) Law and Social Change: The Semi-Autonomous Social Field as an Appropriate Subject of Study. Law and Society Review 7, 719–746.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, O. (2002) A Question of Trust, The BBC Reith Lectures, Cambridge: Cambridge UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oudenampsen, D., and Steketee, M. (2000) De Patiëntenbeweging: Van Afhankelijkheid Naar Eigen Regie, In Th. Sunier et al (Eds.) Emancipatie en Subcultuur. Sociale Bewegingen in België en Nederland (pp. 76–97). Amsterdam: Instituut Voor Publiek en Politiek.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oudenampsen, D., et al (2000) Evaluatie Wet Medezeggenschap Cliënten Zorgsector, Achtergrondstudies per Sector, in Opdracht van Zorgonderzoek Nederland, Verwey Jonker Instituut, Utrecht.

  • Peters, K. (2001) Verdeelde Macht: Een onderzoek naar invloed op rijksbesluitvorming in Nederland, diss. VU, Boom, Amsterdam.

  • Rhodes, R.A.W. (1997) Understanding Governance. Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity, and Accountability. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M.J. (1993) Pressure, Power and Policy. State Autonomy and Policy Networks in Great Britain and the United States. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trappenburg, M., and de Groot, M. (2001) Controlling Medical Specialists in the Netherlands. Delegating the Dirty Work, In M.A.P. Bovens, P. ‘t Hart, and B. Guy Peters (Eds.), Success and Failure in Public Governance (pp. 219–237). Edward Elgar, Cheltenham/Northampton.

  • Van Delden, A.Th. (1983) Externe adviesorganen in Nederland, In A.Th. van Delden and J. Kooiman (Eds.), Adviesorganen in de politieke besluitvorming, symposiumverslag, WRR voorstudies V41/1983, Staatsuitgeverij, Den Haag.

  • Van den Berg, J.Th.J., and H.A.A. Molleman (1974) Crisis in de Nederlandse politiek, Samsom, Alhpen a/d Rijn.

  • Van der Meer, F.M., and Raadschelders, J.C.N. (1999) The Senior Civil Service in the Netherlands: A Quest for Unity, In V. Wright and E.C. Page (Eds.), Bureaucratic Elites in Western European States (pp. 205–229). Oxford: Oxford UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vonhoff committee (1980), Elk Kent de Laan Die Derwaart Gaat: Onderzoeksresultaten, Analyse en Richtingen Voor Oplossingen (Commissie Hoofdstructuur Rijksdienst Ministerie van Binnenlandse Zaken).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Margo Trappenburg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Trappenburg, M. Fighting Sectional Interests in Health Care. Health Care Anal 13, 223–237 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-005-6450-z

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-005-6450-z

Keywords

Navigation