Skip to main content
Log in

Why Bioethics is Ill Equipped to Contribute to the Debate about Prolonging Lifespans

  • Published:
HEC Forum Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Arias E, Anderson RN, Kung H, Murphy SL and Kochanek KD.The Ethics of Lifespan Prolongation Deaths: Final data for 2001. National vital statistics reports. 2003; 52 (3). [Online] Available at: <http://www.cdc.gov/ nchs/data/nvsr /nvsr52 /nvsr52/_03.pdf>.

  2. Nuland SB. How we die. New York: Vintage; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kass LR. L'chaim and its limits: Why not immortality? First Things,2001; 113: 17–24.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Callahan D. What kind of life: The limits of medical progress. New York: Simon and Schuster; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Trotter G. Bioethics and healthcare reform: A Whig response to weak consensus. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics,2002; 11: 37–51.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Alora AT and Lumitao JM; eds. Beyond a western bioethics: Voices from the developing world. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Moreno JD. Bioethics is a naturalism. In: McGee G;ed. Pragmatic bioethics, 2 nd ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2003: pp. 3–16.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Trotter G. Pragmatic bioethics and the big fat moral community. The Journal of Medicine and Phil_osophy, 2003; 28: 655–671.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Moreno JD. Deciding together: Bioethics and moral consensus. New York: Oxford University Press; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Engelhardt HT Jr. Foundations of Christian bioethics. Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Schaub D. Methuselah and us. The New AtlantisWinter 2004; 4: 37–42.

    Google Scholar 

  12. President's Council on Bioethics. (2003). Beyond therapy: Biotechnology and the pursuit of happiness. [Online] Available at: <http://bioethicsprint.bioethics.gov/reports/beyondtherapy>.

  13. Juengst ET, Binstock RH, Mehlman M, Post SG, and Whitehouse P. Biogerentology, 'anti-aging medicine,' and the challenges of human enhancement. Hastings Center Report,2003; 33(4): 21–30.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Trotter G. The loyal physician: Roycean ethics and the practice of medicine. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gems D. Is more life always better? The new biology of aging and the meaning of life. Hastings Center Report,2003; 33: 31–39.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Flathman, Richard E. Thomas Hobbes: Skepticism, individuality, and chastened politics. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Neal P. Liberalism and its discontents. New York: New York University Press; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gray J. Two faces of liberalism. New York: The New Press; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hayflick L. Anarchy in gerontological terminology. The Gerontologist,2002; 42: 416–421.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gutmann A and Thompson D. Democracy and disagreement.Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Barrow JD. Theories of everything: The quest for ultimate explanation. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Royce J. The philosophy of loyalty. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Trotter, G. Why Bioethics is Ill Equipped to Contribute to the Debate about Prolonging Lifespans. HEC Forum 16, 197–213 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:HECF.0000047577.30205.6f

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:HECF.0000047577.30205.6f

Navigation