Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Selfhood and Fiduciary Community: A Smithian Reading of Tu Weiming’s Confucian Humanism

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Dao Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Tu Weiming, as a leading spokesman for contemporary New Confucianism, has been reinterpreting the Confucian tradition in the face of the challenges of modernity. Tu takes selfhood as his starting point, emphasizing the importance of cultivating the human mind-and-heart as a deepening and broadening process to realize the anthropocosmic dao. He highlights the concept of a “fiduciary community” and advocates that, because of it, Confucianism remains a dynamic “inclusive humanism.” Tu’s mode of thinking tallies well with Wilfred C. Smith’s vision of religion, specifically the latter’s exposition of faith as a universal human quality and proposal of “corporate critical self-consciousness.” This article details the theories of both scholars, highlights their similarities, and contrasts their differences. It argues that Smith’s world theology provides a heuristic framework through which one understands how Tu has advanced his Confucian humanism from a Chinese philosophical or cultural tradition to the midst of world religions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Berthrong, John H. 1994. All Under Heaven: Transforming Paradigms in Confucian–Christian Dialogue. Albany: SUNY.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1998. “Confucian Piety and the Religious Dimension of Japanese Confucianism.” Philosophy East and West 48.1: 36–79.

  • Chan, Wing-tsit. 1963. A Source Book in Chinese Philosophy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, Carsun. 1962. The Development of Neo-Confucian Thought, vol. 2. New York: Bookman Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, Hao. 1976. “New Confucianism and the Intellectual Crisis of Contemporary China.” In The Limits of Change. Ed. by Charlotte Furth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Hsi-yuan. 1999. Confucianism Encounters Religion: The Formation of Religious Discourse and the Confucian Movement in Modern China. Harvard University Ph. D. Dissertation.

  • Ching, Julia. 1986. “What Is Confucian Spirituality?” In Confucianism: The Dynamics of Tradition. Ed. by Irene Eber. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cracknell, Kenneth, ed. 2001. Wilfred Cantwell Smith: A Reader. Oxford: Oneworld.

  • Dirlik, Arif. 1995. “Confucius in the Borderlands: Global Capitalism and the Reinvention of Confucianism.” Boundary 2.22.3: 229–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvard University Gazette, November 29, 2001.

  • Huang, Jinxing 黃進興. 1997. “Confucianism as a Religion: A Preliminary Inquiry in Comparative Religion 作為宗教的儒家:一個比較宗教的初步探討.” Yazhou yanjiu 亞洲研究 33: 184–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leveson, Joseph R. 1968. Confucian China and Its Modern Fate: A Trilogy. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Shu-hsien. 2003. Essentials of Contemporary Neo-Confucian Philosophy. Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makeham, John. 2003. “The New Daotong.” In New Confucianism: A Critical Examination. Ed. by John Makeham. New York: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neville, Robert C. 2000. Boston Confucianism: Portable Tradition in the Late-Modern World. Albany: SUNY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pruett, Gordon E. 1990. “World Theology and World Community: The Vision of Wilfred Cantwell Smith.” SR 19.4: 397–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Wilfred C. 1943. Modern Islam in India: A Social Analysis. Lahore: Minerva.

    Google Scholar 

  • _____. 1957. Islam in Modern History. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • _____. 1963a. The Faith of Other Men. New York: New American Library (also published as: Patterns of Faith around the World. Oxford: Oneworld, 1998).

  • _____. 1963b, 1978. The Meaning and End of Religion: A New Approach to the Religious Traditions of Mankind. New York: Macmillan/New York: Harper & Row.

  • _____. 1979. Faith and Belief. Princeton: Princeton University Press (also published as: Faith and Belief: The Difference between Them. Oxford: Oneworld, 1998).

  • _____. 1981. Towards a World Theology: Faith and the Comparative History of Religion. Philadelphia: The Westminster Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • _____. 1982a. “The Study of Religion and the Study of the Bible.” In Religious Diversity. Ed. by Willard G. Oxtoby. New York: Crossroad.

    Google Scholar 

  • _____. 1982b. “What Should We Expect in the New Millennium?” In Religious Diversity. Ed. by Willard G. Oxtoby. New York: Crossroad.

    Google Scholar 

  • _____. 1982c. “Objectivity and the Humane Sciences: A New Proposal.” In Religious Diversity. Ed. by Willard G. Oxtoby. New York: Crossroad.

    Google Scholar 

  • _____. 1982d. “Comparative Religion: Whither—and Why?” In Religious Diversity. Ed. by Willard G. Oxtoby. New York: Crossroad.

    Google Scholar 

  • _____. 1993. What Is Scripture? A Comparative Approach. Minneapolis: Fortress.

    Google Scholar 

  • _____. 1998. Believing: An Historical Perspective. Oxford: Oneworld.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang, Junyi 唐君毅. 1975. “Our Common Conviction about Chinese Academic Studies and the Future of Chinese Culture and World Culture 我們對中國學術研究及中國文化與世界文化前途之共同認識.” In his Chinese Human Studies and the World Today 中華人文與當代世界. Taipei 臺北: Xuesheng Shuju 學生書局.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Rodney L. 1998. “The Religious Character of the Confucian Tradition.” Philosophy East and West 48.1: 80–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tu, Weiming. 1976. “Hsiung Shih-li’s Quest for Authentic Existence.” In The Limits of Change: Essays on Conservative Alternatives in Republican China. Ed. by Charlotte Furth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • _____. 1985a. “Neo-Confucian Religiosity and Human Relatedness.” In his Confucian Thought: Selfhood as Creative Transformation. Albany: SUNY.

    Google Scholar 

  • _____. 1985b. “A Confucian Perspective on Learning to be Human.” In his Confucian Thought: Selfhood as Creative Transformation. Albany: SUNY.

    Google Scholar 

  • _____. 1985c. The Way, Learning and Politics in Classical Confucian Humanism. Singapore: The Institute of East Asian Philosophies.

    Google Scholar 

  • _____. 1986. “Toward a Third Epoch of Confucian Humanism: A Background Understanding.” In Confucianism: The Dynamics of Tradition. Ed. by Irene Eber. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • _____. 1987. “Iconoclasm, Holistic Vision, and Patient Watchfulness: A Personal Reflection on the Modern Chinese Intellectual Quest.” Daedalus 116.2:75–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • _____. 1989a. “New Directions of Confucian Learning from Perspectives on Intellectual Trends in the World 儒學第三期發展的前景問題.” In his The Prospect of the Third Epoch 台北. Taipei 台北: Lianjing 聯經.

    Google Scholar 

  • _____. 1989b. “Traditional Culture and Chinese Reality: An Inteview on Promoting Confucianism in Mainland China 傳統文化與中國現實:有關在中國大陸推展儒學的訪談.” In his The Prospect of the Third Epoch 儒學第三期發展的前景問題. Taipei 台北: Lianjing 聯經.

    Google Scholar 

  • _____. 1989c. Centrality and Commonality: An Essay on Confucian Religiosity. Albany: SUNY.

    Google Scholar 

  • _____. 1991a. “The Search for Roots in Industrial East Asia: The Case of the Confucian Revival.” In Fundamentalisms Observed. Ed. by Martin E. Marty and R. Scott Appleby. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • _____. 1991b. “Cultural China: The Periphery as the Center.” Daedalus 120.2:1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • _____. 1998. “Beyond the Enlightenment Mentality.” In Confucianism and Ecology: The Interrelation of Heaven, Earth, and Humans. Ed. by Mary E. Tucker and John Berthrong. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • _____. 2000. “Confucian Humanism and Religious Studies.” Taiwan Journal of Religious Studies 台灣宗教研究 1.1: 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, Mary E. 1998. “Religious Dimensions of Confucianism: Cosmology and Cultivation.” Philosophy East and West 48.1: 5–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Fansen 王汎森. 1994. “Unofficial Confucian Schools during the Daoxian Period: Responses from the School of Taigu 道咸 年間民間性儒家學派:太谷學派研究的回應.” Xinshixue 新史學 5.4: 141–162.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Graduate Institute of Religious Studies, National Chengchi University, Taipei, 116, Taiwan

    Yen-zen Tsai

Authors
  1. Yen-zen Tsai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yen-zen Tsai.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tsai, Yz. Selfhood and Fiduciary Community: A Smithian Reading of Tu Weiming’s Confucian Humanism. Dao 7, 349–365 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-008-9085-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-008-9085-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation