Skip to main content
Log in

The Doctrine of Double Effect and the Question of Constraints on Business Decisions

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

How does the doctrine of double effect apply to business decisions to sell products which may be harmful to consumers? Lawrence Masek believes that some authors have misapplied the doctrine to this type of decision and, as a consequence, have committed themselves to placing unwarranted constraints on businesses. Seeking to correct this mistake, Masek presents his account of how the doctrine applies here, an account which is rather permissive but which, he claims, nevertheless preserves the virtues of the doctrine. It will be seen, though, that his attempt to loosen these putatively unnecessary constraints by appealing to consumer autonomy and an intuition about the morality of producing harmful products leaves the doctrine of double effect irrelevant to this type of decision. His argument that the doctrine is less restrictive in this context than others suppose leads ultimately to the conclusion that the doctrine does not constrain this kind of business decision at all.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • D. Ardagh (1990) ArticleTitleThe Immorality of Nuclear Deterrence The International Philosophical Quarterly 30 IssueID3 343–358

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Boyle (1980) ArticleTitleToward Understanding the Principle of Double Effect Ethics 90 527–538

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Boyle (1991) ArticleTitleWho Is Entitled to Double Effect? The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 475–494 Occurrence Handle10.1007/978-0-585-28295-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Boyle (1997) ArticleTitleIntentions, Christian Morality, and Bioethics: Puzzles of Double Effect Christian Bioethics 3 IssueID2 87–88

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Finnis J. Boyle G. Grisez (1999) A Sounder Theory of Morality R. McCornick C. Curran (Eds) Readings in Moral Theology No.11 The Historical Development of Moral Theology in the United States. Paulist Press New York 200–218

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Finnis J. Boyle G. Grisez (1987) Nuclear Deterrence, Morality, and Realism Clarendon New York

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Foot (1967) ArticleTitleThe Problem of Abortion and the Doctrine of the Double Effect The Oxford Review 5 5–15

    Google Scholar 

  • II. John Paul (1993) Veritatis Splendor Pauline Books and Media Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Johnstone (1985) ArticleTitleThe Meaning of Proportionate Reason in Contemporary Moral Theology The Thomist 40 IssueID2 223–247

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Mangan (1949) ArticleTitleAn Historical Analysis of the Principle of Double Effect Theological Studies X 41–61

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Marquis (1991) ArticleTitleFour Versions of Double Effect The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 515–544

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Masek (2000) ArticleTitleThe Doctrine of Double Effect, Deadly Drugs, and Business Ethics: A Reply to Velasquez and Brady Business Ethics Quarterly 10 483–495

    Google Scholar 

  • R. McCormick (1981) How Brave a New World? SCM Press London

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Porter (1999) The Moral Act in Veritatis Splendor and Aquinas’s Summa Theologiae: A Comparative Analysis R. McCormick C. Curran (Eds) Readings in Moral Theology No.11 The Historical Development of Moral Theology in the United States. Paulist Press New York 219–241

    Google Scholar 

  • M Velasquez N. Brady (1997) ArticleTitleCatholic Natural Law and Business Ethics Business Ethics Quarterly 7 83–107

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrick A. Tully.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tully, P.A. The Doctrine of Double Effect and the Question of Constraints on Business Decisions. J Bus Ethics 58, 51–63 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-1383-x

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-1383-x

Keywords

Navigation