Abstract.
How does the doctrine of double effect apply to business decisions to sell products which may be harmful to consumers? Lawrence Masek believes that some authors have misapplied the doctrine to this type of decision and, as a consequence, have committed themselves to placing unwarranted constraints on businesses. Seeking to correct this mistake, Masek presents his account of how the doctrine applies here, an account which is rather permissive but which, he claims, nevertheless preserves the virtues of the doctrine. It will be seen, though, that his attempt to loosen these putatively unnecessary constraints by appealing to consumer autonomy and an intuition about the morality of producing harmful products leaves the doctrine of double effect irrelevant to this type of decision. His argument that the doctrine is less restrictive in this context than others suppose leads ultimately to the conclusion that the doctrine does not constrain this kind of business decision at all.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
D. Ardagh (1990) ArticleTitleThe Immorality of Nuclear Deterrence The International Philosophical Quarterly 30 IssueID3 343–358
J. Boyle (1980) ArticleTitleToward Understanding the Principle of Double Effect Ethics 90 527–538
J. Boyle (1991) ArticleTitleWho Is Entitled to Double Effect? The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 475–494 Occurrence Handle10.1007/978-0-585-28295-4
J. Boyle (1997) ArticleTitleIntentions, Christian Morality, and Bioethics: Puzzles of Double Effect Christian Bioethics 3 IssueID2 87–88
J. Finnis J. Boyle G. Grisez (1999) A Sounder Theory of Morality R. McCornick C. Curran (Eds) Readings in Moral Theology No.11 The Historical Development of Moral Theology in the United States. Paulist Press New York 200–218
J. Finnis J. Boyle G. Grisez (1987) Nuclear Deterrence, Morality, and Realism Clarendon New York
P. Foot (1967) ArticleTitleThe Problem of Abortion and the Doctrine of the Double Effect The Oxford Review 5 5–15
II. John Paul (1993) Veritatis Splendor Pauline Books and Media Boston
B. Johnstone (1985) ArticleTitleThe Meaning of Proportionate Reason in Contemporary Moral Theology The Thomist 40 IssueID2 223–247
J. Mangan (1949) ArticleTitleAn Historical Analysis of the Principle of Double Effect Theological Studies X 41–61
D. Marquis (1991) ArticleTitleFour Versions of Double Effect The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 515–544
L. Masek (2000) ArticleTitleThe Doctrine of Double Effect, Deadly Drugs, and Business Ethics: A Reply to Velasquez and Brady Business Ethics Quarterly 10 483–495
R. McCormick (1981) How Brave a New World? SCM Press London
J. Porter (1999) The Moral Act in Veritatis Splendor and Aquinas’s Summa Theologiae: A Comparative Analysis R. McCormick C. Curran (Eds) Readings in Moral Theology No.11 The Historical Development of Moral Theology in the United States. Paulist Press New York 219–241
M Velasquez N. Brady (1997) ArticleTitleCatholic Natural Law and Business Ethics Business Ethics Quarterly 7 83–107
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tully, P.A. The Doctrine of Double Effect and the Question of Constraints on Business Decisions. J Bus Ethics 58, 51–63 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-1383-x
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-1383-x