Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Doffing the Mask: Why Manuscript Reviewers Ought to Be Identifiable

  • Published:
Journal of Academic Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

REFERENCES

  • Bacchetti, P. (2002). Peer review of statistics inmedical research: the other problem, British Medical Journal 324, 1271–1273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J.R. (2000). Privatizing the university – the new tragedy of the Commons, Science 290, 1701–1702.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, K.A. and McGee, G. (2002). Conflict of interest and AJOB, American Journal of Bioethics 2 (3), 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, M. (1999). Science's new social contract with society, Nature 402, C81–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godlee, F. (2002). Making reviewers visible: Openness, accountability, and credit, Journal of the American Medical Association 287 (21), 2762–2765.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldbeck-Wood, S. (1998). What makes a good reviewer of manuscripts? British Medical Journal 316, 86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldbeck-Wood, S. (1999). Evidence on peer review – scientific quality control or smokescreen? British Medical Journal 318, 44–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. (1997). Peer review: reform or revolution? British Medical Journal 315, 759–760.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. (1999). Opening up BMJ peer review, British Medical Journal 318, 4–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. (2001). Medical editor lambasts journals and editors, British Medical Journal 323, 651.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Biomedical Ethics Unit, Department of Social Studies of Medicine, McGill University, 3647 Peel Street, Montreal, Canada, H3A 1W9

    Leigh Turner

Authors
  1. Leigh Turner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Turner, L. Doffing the Mask: Why Manuscript Reviewers Ought to Be Identifiable. Journal of Academic Ethics 1, 41–48 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025454331738

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025454331738

Keywords

Search

Navigation