Skip to main content
Log in

Politics, Bioethics, and Science Policy

  • Published:
HEC Forum Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Almond G., Verba S. (1963). The civic culture: political attitudes and democracy in five nations. Princeton, Princeton University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, M. (2004). Bush dismisses council members. The Scientist, March 3.

  • Barke R.P. (2003). Politics and interests in the republic of science. Minerva, 41, 305–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellah R.N. (1975). The broken covenant: American civil religion in time of trial. Chicago, The University of Chicago Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn, E. (2004a). A ‘full range” of bioethical views just got narrower. Washington Post, March 7, B02.

  • Blackburn E. (2004b). Bioethics and the political distortion of biomedical science. New England Journal of Medicine, 350, 1379–1380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn E., Rowley J. (2004) Reason as our guide. PloS Biology 2: 0001–0003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boonstra, H. (2003). Critics charge Bush mix of science and politics is unprecedented and dangerous. The Guttmacher Report on Public Policy, May, 1–3.

  • Callahan D. (2005). Bioethics and the culture wars. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 14, 424–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caplan, A. (2005). ‘Who lost China?’ A foreshadowing of today’s ideological disputes in bioethics. Hastings Center Report, May–June, 12–13.

  • Charo R.A. (2004). Passing on the right: conservative bioethics is closer than it appears. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics, 32(2): 307–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charo, R.A. (2005). Realbioethik. Hastings Center Report, July–August, 13–14.

  • Check E. (2005). U.S. progressives fight for a voice in bioethics. Nature, 437, 932–933

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emery D.D., Schneiderman L.J. (1989). Cost–effectiveness analysis in health care. Hastings Center Report, 19(4): 8–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engelhardt H.T., Jr. (2002). Consensus formation: the creation of an ideology. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 11(1): 7–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferber D. (2002). Overhaul of CDC panel revives lead safety debate. Science, 298, 732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goklany I.M. (2002). From precautionary principle to risk–risk analysis. Nature Biotechnology, 20(11): 1075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green R. (2006). For richer or poorer? Evaluating the President’s Council on bioethics. HEC Forum, 18, 108–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg D. (2004). New report accuses Bush of suppressing research data. The Lancet, 363, 874

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg D. (2001). The Bush White House: science advice still out in the cold. The Lancet, 357, 1773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimes D. (2004). Emergency contraception: politics trumps science at the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 104(2): 220–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutmann A., Thompson D. (1996). Democracy and disagreement. Cambridge, Massachusetts, Harvard University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Hampshire S. (2000). Justice is conflict. Princeton, Princeton University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Holm S. (2004). Bioethics down under—medical ethics engages with political philosophy. Journal of Medical Ethics, 31(1):1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter J.D. (1991). Culture wars: the struggle to define America. New York, Basic Books

    Google Scholar 

  • Kass, L. (2004). We don’t play politics with science. Washington Post, March 3, A27.

  • Kennedy D. (2003). An epidemic of politics. Science, 299, 625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kingdon J. (1999). America the unusual. New York, Worth Publishers

    Google Scholar 

  • Lancet Editors. (2002). Keeping scientific advice non–partisan. The Lancet, 360, 1525.

  • Leshner A.I. (2003). Don’t let ideology trump science. Science, 302, 1479

    Google Scholar 

  • Malakoff D. (2003). Democrats accuse Bush of letting politics distort science. Science, 301, 901

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marchant G.E. (2003). From general policy to legal rule: aspirations and limitations of the precautionary principle. Environmental Health Perspectives 111(14): 1799–1803

    Google Scholar 

  • May C. (2006). Mobilizing modern facts: health technology assessment and the politics of evidence. Sociology of Health and Illness, 28, 513–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mooney C. (2005). The Republican war on science. New York, Basic Books

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreira T. (2007). Entangled evidence: knowledge making in systematic reviews in healthcare. Sociology of Health and Illness, 29, 180–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreno, J.D. (2002). The brief career of a Government Advisory Committee: one member’s perspective. The American Journal of Bioethics, 2(4).

  • Moreno, J.D. (2005). The end of the great bioethics compromise. Hastings Center Report, January–February, 14–15.

  • Novak K. (2003). U.S. scientific panels Bush–whacked. Nature Medicine, 9(2): 153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrino E. (2006). Bioethics and politics: “doing ethics”in the public square. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 31, 569–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pielke R.A. Jr. (2002). Policy, politics and perspective. Nature, 416, 367–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollard T.D. (2001). Life scientists and politics in the United States. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 2, 929–931

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powers M. (2005). Bioethics as politics: the limits of moral expertise. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 15(3): 205–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Revkin, A.C. (2004). Bush vs. the laureates: how science became a partisan issue. The New York Times, October 19.

  • Rorty R. (1999). Philosophy and social hope. London, Penguin Books

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman S. (2007). Undermining science: suppression and distortion in the Bush Administration. Berkeley, University of California Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Sowell T. (2002). A conflict of visions: ideological origins of political struggle. New York, Basic Books

    Google Scholar 

  • Union of Concerned Scientists. (2004). Scientific integrity in policymaking: an investigation into the Bush Administration’s misuse of science. February. Cambridge: Union of Concerned Scientists.

  • United States House of Representatives Committee on Government Reform—Minority Staff Special Investigation Division. (2003). Politics and science in the Bush Administration. Prepared for Henry A. Waxman. August. Van den Belt, H. (2003). Debating the precautionary principle: ‘guilty until proven innocent,’or ‘innocent until proven guilty’? Plant Physiology, 132(3), 1122–1126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, R. (2004). Bush ejects two from bioethics council. Washington Post, February 28, A06.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leigh Turner Ph.D..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Turner, L. Politics, Bioethics, and Science Policy. HEC Forum 20, 29–47 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10730-008-9062-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10730-008-9062-9

Keywords

Navigation