Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Relational Leadership Theory: Exploring the Social Processes of Leadership and Organizing

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Leadership, Gender, and Organization

Part of the book series: Issues in Business Ethics ((IBET,volume 63))

  • 213 Accesses

Abstract

Relational leadership is a relatively new term in the leadership literature, and because of this, its meaning is open to interpretation. In the present article I describe two perspectives of relational leadership: an entity perspective that focuses on identifying attributes of individuals as they engage in interpersonal relationships, and a relational perspective that views leadership as a process of social construction through which certain understandings of leadership come about and are given privileged ontology. These approaches can be complementary, but their implications for study and practice are quite different. After reviewing leadership research relative to these two perspectives I offer Relational Leadership Theory (RLT) as an overarching framework for the study of leadership as a social influence process through which emergent coordination (e.g., evolving social order) and change (e.g., new approaches, values, attitudes, behaviors, ideologies) are constructed and produced. This framework addresses relationships both as an outcome of investigation (e.g., How are leadership relationships produced?) and a context for action (e.g., How do relational dynamics contribute to structuring?). RLT draws from both entity and relational ontologies and methodologies to more fully explore the relational dynamics of leadership and organizing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abell, E. and S. Simons (2000). How much can you bend before you break: An experience of using constructionist consulting as a tool for organizational learning in the corporate world. European Journal of Work & Organizational Psychology 9(2):159–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Heritage Dictionary (2000). American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, 10th edn. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, S.M. and S. Chen (2002). The relational self: An interpersonal social-cognitive theory. Psychological Review 109(4):619–645.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C., R. Putnam and D. Smith (1985). Action Science. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashforth, B.E. (1999). Leadership as an embedded process: Some insights from Sayles’ Managerial Behavior. The Leadership Quarterly 10(1):21–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashforth, B.E. and R.H. Humphrey (1995). Emotions in the workplace: A reappraisal. Human Relations 48(2):97–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashkanasy, N.M., C. Hartel and W.J. Zerbe (eds.) (2000). Emotions in the Workplace: Theory, Research and Practice. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balkundi, P. and M. Kilduff (2005). The ties that lead: A social network approach to leadership. The Leadership Quarterly 16(6):941–961.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barley, S.R. (1986). Technology as an occasion for structuring: Evidence from observations of ct scanners and the social order of radiology departments. Administrative Science Quarterly 31(1):78–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barry, B. and J.M. Crant (2000). Dyadic communication relationships in organizations: An attribution/expectancy approach. Organization Science 11(6):648–664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartunek, J.H. and M. Louis (1996). Insider/Outsider Team Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, G. (1979). Mind and Nature: A Necessary Unity. New York, NY: E.P. Dutton

    Google Scholar 

  • Bedeian, A.G. and J.G. Hunt (2006). Academic amnesia and vestigial assumptions of our forefathers. The Leadership Quarterly 17(2):190–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blau, P.M. (1964). Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgatti, S.P. and P.C. Foster (2003). The network paradigm in organizational research: A review and typology. Journal of Management 29(6):991–1013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouwen, R. and D.M. Hosking (2000). Reflections on relational readings of organizational learning. European Journal of Work & Organizational Psychology 9(2):267–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, N.G. and R.R. Taylor (1998). A developmental approach to the examination of friendship in leader-follower relationships. The Leadership Quarterly 9(1):1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury, H. and B. Lichtenstein (2000). Relationality in organizational research: Exploring the “space between”. Organization Science 11(5):551–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, M.B. and W. Gardner (1996). Who is this “we”? Levels of collective identity and self representations. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology 71(1):83–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brower, H.H., F.D. Schoorman and H.H. Tan (2000). A model of relational leadership: The integration of trust and leader-member exchange. The Leadership Quarterly 11(2): 227–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, H. and D.M. Hosking (1986). Distributed leadership and skilled performamce as successful organization in social movements. Human Relations 39(1):65–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M.E. and D.A. Gioia (2002). Making things ‘click’: Distributive leadership in an online division of an offline organization. The Leadership Quarterly 13(4):397–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryman, A. (1996). Leadership in organizations. In S.R. Clegg, C. Hardy and W. Nord (eds.) Handbook of Organization Studies. London: Sage Publications, pp. 276–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryman, A. (2004). Qualitative research on leadership: A critical but appreciative review. The Leadership Quarterly 13(4):397–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R.S. (1992). Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cooperrider, D.L. and S. Srivasta (1987). Appreciative inquiry into organizational life. Research in organizational change and development 1:129–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooren, F. and G.T. Fairhurst (2004). Speech timing and spacing: The phenomenon of organizational closure. Organization 11(6):793–824.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dachler, H.P. (1988). Constraints on the emergence of new vistas in leadership and management research: An epistemological overview. In J.G. Hunt, B.R. Baliga, H.P. Dachler and C.A. Schriesheim (eds.), Emerging Leadership Vistas. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books/D.C. Heath and Co., pp. 261–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dachler, H.P. (1992). Management and leadership as relational phenomena. In M.v. Cranach, W. Doise and G. Mugny (eds.), Social Representations and Social Bases of Knowledge. Lewiston, NY: Hogrefe and Huber, pp. 169–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dachler, H.P. and D.M. Hosking (1995). The primacy of relations in socially constructing organizational realities. In D.M. Hosking, H.P. Dachler and K.J. Gergen (eds.), Management and Organization: Relational Alternatives to Individualism. Aldershot: Avebury, pp. 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deetz, S. (1992). Democracy in an Age of Corporate Colonization. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deetz, S. (2000). Describing differences in approaches to organisation science. In P. Frost, R. Lewin and D. Daft (eds.), Talking About Organisation Science. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drath, W. (2001). The Deep Blue Sea: Rethinking the Source of Leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass and Center for Creative Leadership.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairhurst, G.T. and L. Putnam (2004). Organizations as discursive constructions. Communication Theory 14(1):5–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, J.K. (2004). The paradox of postheroic leadership: An essay on gender, power, and transformational change. The Leadership Quarterly 15(5):647–661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fombrun, C.J. (1986). Structural dynamics within and between organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly 31(3):403–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. London: Allen and Lane. Gergen, K.J. (1994). Realities and Relationships. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gergen, K. (1984). “An Introduction to Historical Social Psychology.” Historical Social Psychology, 3:36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerstner, C.R. and D.V. Day (1997). Meta-analytic review of leader-member exchange theory: Correlates and construct issues. Journal of Applied Psychology 82(6):827–844.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graen, G. (2006). Post Simon, March, Weick, and Graen: New leadership sharing as a key to understanding organizations. In G. Graen and J.A. Graen (eds.), Sharing Network Leadership, vol. 4. Greenwich, CT: Information Age, pp. 269–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graen, G. and J.A. Graen (2006). Sharing Network Leadership, vol. 4. Greenwich, CT:Information Age.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graen, G.B., M.A. Novak and P. Sommerkamp (1982). The effects of leader-member exchange and job design on productivity and satisfaction: Testing a dual attachment model. Organizational Behavior & Human Performance 30(1):109–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graen, G.B. and T. Scandura (1987). Toward a psychology of dyadic organizing. In B.M. Staw and L.L. Cummings (eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, vol. 9. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, pp. 175–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graen, G. and M. Uhl-Bien (1991). The transformation of professionals into self-managing and partially self-designing contributors: Toward a theory of leadership-making. Journal of Management Systems 3(3):49–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graen, G. and M. Uhl-Bien (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. The Leadership Quarterly 6(2):219–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology 78:1360–1380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grint, K. (2005). Leadership: Limits and Possibilities. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gronn, P. (1999). A realist view of leadership. Paper presented at the Educational leaders for the new millenium – Leaders with soul, ELO-AusAsia On-line Conference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gronn, P. (2002). Distributed leadership as a unit of analysis. The Leadership Quarterly 13(4): 423–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatch, M.J. (1997). Organization Theory: Modern, Symbolic, and Postmodern Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heider, F. (1958). The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. New York, NY: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Heron, J. (1996). Quality as primacy of the practical. Qualitative Inquiry 2(3):41–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heron, J. and P. Reason (2001). The practice of co-operative inquiry: Research “with” rather than “on” people. In P. Reason and H. Bradbury (eds.), Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice. London: Sage, pp. 179–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogg, M.A. (2001). A social identity theory of leadership. Personality & Social Psychology Review 5(3):184–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogg, M.A. (2005). Social identity and leadership. In D.M. Messick and R.M. Kramer (eds.), The Psychology of Leadership: New Perspectives and Research. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 53–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollander, E.P. (1958). Conformity, status, and idiosyncrasy credit. Psychological Review 65: 117–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollander, E.P. (1964). Leaders, Groups, and Influence. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollander, E.P. (1978). Leadership Dynamics: A Practical Guide to Effective Relationships. New York, NY: Free Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollander, E.P. (1979). The impact of Ralph M. Stogdill and the Ohio State leadership studies on a transactional approach to leadership. Journal of Management 5(2):157–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollander, E.P. (1992). The essential interdependence of leadership and followership. Current Directions in Psychological Science 1(2):71–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollander, E.P. (1995). Ethical challenges in the leader-follower relationship. Business Ethics Quarterly 5(1):55–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollander, E.P. and J.W. Julian (1969). Contemporary trends in the analysis of leadership processes. Psychological Bulletin 71(5):387–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmberg, R. (2000). Organizational learning and participation: Some critical reflections from a relational perspective. European Journal of Work & Organizational Psychology 9(2): 177–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Homans, G.C. (1961). Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace, and World.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homans, G.C. (1974). Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms, Rev. edn. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosking, D.M. (1988). Organizing, leadership, and skilful process. Journal of Management Studies 25(2):147–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosking, D.M. (2000). Ecology in mind, mindful practices. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 9(2):147–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosking, D.M. and R. Bouwen (2000). Organizational learning: Relational-constructionist approaches: An overview. European Journal of Work & Organizational Psychology 9(2): 129–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosking, D.M., H.P. Dachler and K.J. Gergen (eds.) (1995). Management and Organization: Relational Alternatives to Individualism. Brookfield, CT: Avebury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosking, D. and S. Fineman (1990). Organizing processes. Journal of Management Studies 27(6):583–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosking, D.-M. and I.E. Morley (1988). The skills of leadership. In J.G. Hunt, B.R. Baliga, H.P. Dachler and C.A. Schriesheim (eds.), Emerging Leadership Vistas. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books/D. C. Heath and Co., pp. 80–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosking, D.M. (2007). Not leaders, not followers: A post-modern discourse of leadership processes. In B. Shamir, R. Pillai, M. Bligh and M. Uhl-Bien (eds.), Follower-Centered Perspectives on Leadership: A Tribute to the Memory of James R. Meindl (pp. 243–264). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • House, R.J. and R. Aditya (1997). The social scientific study of leadership: Quo vadis? Journal of Management 23:409–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howell, J.M. and B. Shamir (2005). The role of followers in the charismatic leadership process: Relationships and their consequences. Academy of Management Review 30(1):96–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey, R.H. (2002). The many faces of emotional leadership. The Leadership Quarterly 13:493–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, J.G. (2004). What is leadership? In J. Antonakis, A.T. Cianciolo and R.J. Sternberg (eds.), The Nature of Leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 19–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, J. and G.E. Dodge (2000). Leadership déjà vu all over again. The Leadership Quarterly Review of Leadership 11(4):435–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, J.G. and A. Ropo (1998). Multi-level leadership: Grounded theory and mainstream theory applied to the case of general motors. In F. Dansereau and F.J. Yammarino (eds.), Leadership: The Multiple-Level Approaches. Westport, CT: JAI Press, pp. 289–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibarra, H., M. Kilduff and W. Tsai (2005). Zooming in and out: Connecting individuals and collectivities at the frontiers of organizational network research. Organization Science 16(4):359–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, B. and E. Guthey (2007). Putting the visual into the social construction of leadership. In B. Shamir, R. Pillai, M. Bligh and M. Uhl-Bien (eds.), Follower-Centered Perspectives on Leadership: A Tribute to the Memory of James R. Meindl (pp. 167–186). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, T.O. (1971). Leadership and Exchange in Formal Organizations. Alexandria, VA: Human Resources Research Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jermier, J. (1993). Introduction – Charismatic leadership: Neo-weberian perspectives. The Leadership Quarterly 4(3-4):217–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kark, R. and B. Shamir (2002). The influence of transformational leadership on followers’ relational versus collective self-concept. Academy of Management Proceedings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, D. and R.L. Kahn (1978). The Social Psychology of Organizations. New York, NY: Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellett, J.B., R.H. Humphrey and R.G. Sleeth (2002). Empathy and complex task performance: Two routes to leadership. The Leadership Quarterly 13(5):523–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilduff, M. and W. Tsai (2003). Social Networks and Organizations. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, K.J. and R.J. House (1995). On fire: Charismatic leadership and levels of analysis. The Leadership Quarterly 6(2):183–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krackhardt, D. (1999). The ties that torture: Simmelian tie analysis in organizations. Research in the sociology of organizations 16:183–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T.S. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd edn. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liden, R.C., R.T. Sparrowe, S.J. Wayne and G.R. Ferris (1997). Leader-member exchange theory: The past and potential for the future. In Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, vol. 15. New York, NY/Greenwich, CT: Elsevier Science/JAI Press, pp. 47–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Likert, R. (1961). New Patterns of Management. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipman-Blumen, J. (1996). Connective Leadership: Managing in a Changing World. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord, R.G., D.J. Brown and S.J. Freiberg (1999). Understanding the dynamics of leadership: The role of follower self-concepts in the leader/follower relationship. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 78:1–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lord, R.G. and K.J. Maher (1991). Leadership and Information Processing: Linking Perceptions and Performance. Boston, MA: Unwin Hyman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marion, R. and M. Uhl-Bien (2001). Leadership in complex organizations. The Leadership Quarterly 12:389–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meindl, J. (1995). The romance of leadership as a follower-centric theory: A social constructionist approach. The Leadership Quarterly 6(3):329–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murrell, K.L. (1997). Emergent theories of leadership for the next century: Towards relational concepts. Organization Development Journal 15(3):35–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Offstein, E.H., R. Madhavan and D.R. Gnyawali (2006). Pushing the frontier of LMX research: The contribution of triads. In G. Graen and J.A. Graen (eds.), Sharing Network Leadership, vol. 4. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborn, R.N. (1999). Sayles’ managerial behavior: Its impact on understanding leadership and nuclear power safety. The Leadership Quarterly 10(1):13–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osborn, R.N., J.G. Hunt and L.R. Jauch (1980). Organization Theory. New York, NY: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborn, R.N., J.G. Hunt and L.R. Jauch (2002). Toward a contextual theory of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly 13:797–837.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parry, K. and J. Meindl (eds.) (2002). Grounding Theory and Leadership in Research: Issues and Perspectives. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, C.L. and J.A. Conger (2003). Shared Leadership: Reframing the Hows and Whys of Leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, A.S. and A.G. Bedeian (1994). Leader-follower exchange quality: The role of personal and interpersonal attributes. Academy of Management Journal 37(4):990–1001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, L.L. and G.T. Fairhurst (2001). Discourse analysis in organizations. In F.M. Jablin and L. Putnam (eds.), The New Handbook of Organizational Communication. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 78–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rafaeli, A. and M. Worline (2001). Individual emotion in work organizations. Social Science Information 40(1):95–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritter, B.A. and R.G. Lord (2006). Leadership transference: The impact of previous leaders on follower performance. Working Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ropo, A. (2005). Aesthetic perspective to leadership. Paper presented in a professional development workshop at the National Academy of Management Meeting, Honolulu, Hawaii.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ropo, A. and J.G. Hunt (2000). Leadership and organizational change: Some findings from a processual grounded theory study. In J.A. Wagner III (ed.), Advances in Qualitative Organizational Research, vol. 2. Stamford, CT: JAI Press, pp. 169–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rost, J.C. (1991). Leadership for the Twenty-First Century. London: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rost, J.C. (1995). Leadership: A discussion about ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly 5(1): 129–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, D.M. (1998). LMX meets the psychological contract: Looking inside the black box of leader-member exchange. In F. Dansereau and F.J. Yammarino (eds.), Leadership: The Multiple-Level Approaches (Contemporary and Alternative). Stamford, CT: JAI Press, pp. 149–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandelands, L.E. (1998). Feeling and Form in Social Life. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayles, L. (1964). Managerial Behavior: Administration in Complex Organizations. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schriesheim, C.A., S.L. Castro and C.C. Cogliser (1999). Leader-member exchange (LMX) research: A comprehensive review of theory, measurement, and data-analytic practices. The Leadership Quarterly 10(1):63–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seers, A. (2004). Leadership and flexible organizational structures: The future is now. In G.B. Graen (ed.), New Frontiers of Leadership, vol. 2. Greenwich, CT: Information Age, pp. 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P. and K. Kaeufer (2001). Communities of leadership or no leadership at all. In S. Chowdhury (ed.), Management 21c. New York, NY: Prentice Hall, pp. 186–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shamir, B. (1991). Meaning, self and motivation in organizations. Organization Studies 12(3): 405–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shamir, B., R.J. House and M.B. Arthur (1993). The motivational effects of charismatic leadership: A self-concept based theory. Organization Science 4(4):577–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmel, G. (1950). The Isolated Individual and the Dyad. The Sociology of Georg Simmel. Glencoe, IL: Free Press, pp. 118–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjostrand, S.-E., J. Sandberg and M. Tyrstrup (eds.) (2001). Invisible Management: The Social Construction of Leadership. London: Thompson Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparrowe, R. and R. Liden (1997). Process and structure in leader-member exchange. Academy of Management Review 22(2):522–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sparrowe, R. and R. Liden (2005). Two routes to influence: Integrating leader-member exchange and social network perspective. Administrative Science Quarterly 50(4):505–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, R. (1999). Some observations concerning Sayles’ managerial behavior. The Leadership Quarterly 10(1):17–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stogdill, R.M. and A.E. Coons (1957). Leader Behavior: Its Description and Measurement. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stogdill, R.M., O.S. Goode and D.R. Day (1962). New leader behavior description subscales. Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied 54(2):259–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strati, A. (2000). The aesthetic approach to organization studies. In H. Hopfl (ed.), The Aesthetics of Organization. London: Sage, pp. 13–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streatfield, P.J. (2001). The Paradox of Control in Organizations. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S.S. and H. Hansen (2005). Finding form: Looking at the field of organizational aesthetics. Journal of Management Studies 42(6):1211–1231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tichy, N.M., M.L. Tushman and C. Fombrun (1979). Social network analysis for organizations. Academy of Management Review 4(4):507–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J.C., M.A. Hogg, P. Oakes, S. Reicher and M. Wetherell (1987). Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uhl-Bien, M. (2003). Relationship development as a key ingredient for leadership development. In S. Murphy and R. Riggio (eds.), The Future of Leadership Development. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc., pp. 129–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uhl-Bien, M. (2005). Implicit theories of relationships in the workplace. In B. Schyns and J.R. Meindl (eds.), Implicit Leadership Theories: Essays and Explorations. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing, pp. 103–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uhl-Bien, M., G. Graen and T. Scandura (2000). Implications of leader-member exchange (LMX) for strategic human resource management systems: Relationships as social capital for competitive advantage. In G.R. Ferris (ed.), Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management, vol. 18. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, pp. 137–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uhl-Bien, M., R. Marion and B. McKelvey (2004). Complexity leadership theory: Shifting leadership from the industrial age to the knowledge era. Paper presented at the National Academy of Management Meeting, New Orleans, LA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uhl-Bien, M. and J.M. Maslyn (2003). Reciprocity in manager-subordinate relationships: Components, configurations, and outcomes. Journal of Management 29(4):511–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Knippenberg, D., B. van Knippenberg, D. de Cremer and M.A. Hogg (2004). Leadership, self, and identity: A review and research agenda. The Leadership Quarterly 15(6):825–856.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K.E. (1995). Sensemaking in Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K.E. (2001). Making Sense of the Organization. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weierter, S.J.M. (1997). Who wants to play “follow the leader?” A theory of charismatic relationships based on routinized charisma and follower characteristics. The Leadership Quarterly 8(2):171–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willmott, H. (1981). The structuring of organizational structure: A note. Administrative Science Quarterly 26:470–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute for Innovative Leadership, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE, USA

    Mary Uhl-Bien

Authors
  1. Mary Uhl-Bien
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mary Uhl-Bien .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, UK

    Mollie Painter

  2. Chicago, IL, USA

    Patricia H. Werhane

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Uhl-Bien, M. (2023). Relational Leadership Theory: Exploring the Social Processes of Leadership and Organizing. In: Painter, M., Werhane, P.H. (eds) Leadership, Gender, and Organization. Issues in Business Ethics, vol 63. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24445-2_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation