Abstract
Various approaches and methods are used in philosophical counselling. Two main trends can be observed: the first is the use of contemplative methods and the second constitutes approaches based on dialogical critical thinking. The author defends the idea that developing philosophical counselling on the basis of critical thinking presupposes that it is possible for counsellor and client to hold a philosophical dialogue where the relationship is one of expert/lay person. J. Šulavík has described this relationship in greater detail. In the Socratic model, the philosopher and the lay person hold a dialogue whereby they ascertain opinions via inductive comparison and by defining things, creating a shared concept. While the Platonic and Enlightenment models were grounded in the authority of the expert philosopher, in the Socratic and postmodern models, the expert philosopher loses the power to manipulate those who know “less”. Lay people are not passive consumers of a particular “optimal” philosophy but through their own “philosophising” create philosophy and tailor it for themselves. While philosophising, therefore, the philosopher does not take on the role of “producer” of philosophy but of “adviser” (consultant). It is therefore supposed that people have a general need for philosophy and that ultimately they should create and reflect upon their own philosophy.
[1] Achenbach, G. A. (1995). Philosophy, Philosophical Practice and Psychotherapy. In R. Lahav, M. Tillmans (Eds.). Essays on Philosophical Counseling, pp. 61–74. Lanham, New York and London: University Press of America. Search in Google Scholar
[2] Amir, L. B. (2004). Three Questionable Assumptions of Philosophical Practice. The International Journal of Applied Philosophy, 2.1, pp. 9–18. Available at: americanspcp.com/docs/ijpp/lydiaamir.pdf . Search in Google Scholar
[3] Amir, L. B. (2006). More Philosophy, less Counseling: A Method for Philosophical Counseling. In J. B. Rastrojo, J. O. Garcia, F. M. Garfia (Eds.). Philosophy and Practice: From Theory to Practice, pp. 33–39. Sevilla: Ediciones, X–XI. Search in Google Scholar
[4] Boele, D. (1995). Experimental Wisdom and the Art of Living. In R. Lahav, M. Tillmans. Essays on Philosophical Counseling. Lanham, New York and London: University Press of America. Search in Google Scholar
[5] Buber, M. (1995). Já a Ty. [I and Thou]. Olomouc: Votobia. Search in Google Scholar
[6] Curnow, T. (1999). Thinking about Dialogue. Fifth International Conference on Philosophy in Practice, pp. 45–51. Oxford: Wadham College. Search in Google Scholar
[7] Chamberlain, H. S. (1999). Philosophical Counselling: A Dialogue in Critical Thinking. Fifth International Conference on Philosophy in Practice, pp. 34–43. Oxford: Wadham College. Search in Google Scholar
[8] Delnoij, J. (1999). Short Socratic Dialogue Workshop. Fifth International Conference on Philosophy in Practice, pp. 52–53. Oxford: Wadham College. Available at: www.insightassessment.com/what&why2010. Search in Google Scholar
[9] Facione, P. A. (2004). Critical Thinking: What It is and Why It Counts. Millbrae, CA: California Academic Press. Available at: www.mdaa.org.au/archive/05/manual/app2.pdf. Search in Google Scholar
[10] Fisher, R. (2005). Socratic Education: A New Paradigm for Philosophical Enquiry? Creative and Critical Thinking, 4.1, 15–45. Search in Google Scholar
[11] Grimes, P. (1997). A Study of Philosophical Midwifery. Available at: coffeewithpierre.com/?q=node/9 . Search in Google Scholar
[12] Lahav, R. (2006). Philosophical Practice as Contemplative Philo-Sophia. Practical Philosophy 8, 1. Search in Google Scholar
[13] Lebon, T. (1999). Socrates, Philosophical Counselling and Thinking through Dialogue. Fifth International Conference on Philosophy in Practice, pp. 131–142. Oxford: Wadham College. Search in Google Scholar
[14] Marinoff, L. (2002). Philosophical Practice. San Diego, New York, Boston, Sydney, Tokyo, Toronto: Academic Press. Search in Google Scholar
[15] Nelson, L. (1949). Socratic Method and Critical Philosophy. New York: Dover. Search in Google Scholar
[16] Prins-Bakker, A. (1995). Philosophy in Marriage Counseling. In R. Lahav, M. Tillmans (Eds.). Essays on Philosophical Counseling, pp. 135–151. Lanham, New York and London: University Press of America. Search in Google Scholar
[17] Rogers, C. R. (2000). Klientom centrovaná terapia. [Client-Centered Therapy]. [Modra: IRO. Search in Google Scholar
[18] Rogers, C. R. (1997). Spôsob bytia. [A Way of Being]. Modra: IRO. Search in Google Scholar
[19] Schuster, S. C. (1999a). Philosophy Practice: An Alternative to Counseling and Psychotherapy. Westport and London: Praeger. Search in Google Scholar
[20] Schuster, S. C. (1999b). Philosophy Practices as Alternative Ways to Well-being. Radical Psychology 1, No.1. http://www.radicalpsychology.org/vol1-1/Schuster.html (accessed August 30, 2013). Search in Google Scholar
[21] Šulavík, J. (2001). Metafilozofické implikácie psychoterapie. [Metaphilosphical Implications of Psychoteraphy]. Bratislava: Album. Search in Google Scholar
[22] Šulavíková, B. (2006). Autenticita a dobrý život. [Authenticity and the Good Life.] Bratislava: Album. Search in Google Scholar
[23] Tuedio, J. A. (1998). Philosophical Counseling as a Window on the Abstract Realities of Everyday Life. Department of Philosophy, California State University, Stanislaus. Search in Google Scholar
[24] Wollner, U. (2010). Starostlivosť o seba v Xenofóntovom diele Memorabilia. In V. Suvák (Ed.). Sebapoznanie a/ko starosť o seba, pp. 32–78. Prešov: Filozofická fakulta v Prešove. Search in Google Scholar
[25] Xenofón. (1972). Vzpomínky na Sokrata. [Recollections of Socrates]. Praha: Svoboda. Search in Google Scholar
© 2013 Institute for Research in Social Communication, Slovak Academy of Sciences
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
