Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Bad company generalized

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper is concerned with the bad company problem as an instance of a more general difficulty in the philosophy of mathematics. The paper focuses on the prospects of stability as a necessary condition on acceptability. However, the conclusion of the paper is largely negative. As a solution to the bad company problem, stability would undermine the prospects of a neo-Fregean foundation for set theory, and, as a solution to the more general difficulty, it would impose an unreasonable constraint on mathematical practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Boolos, G. (1987). The consistency of Frege’s foundations of arithmetic. In On being and saying: Essays in honor of Richard Cartwright (pp. 3–20). Cambridge: MIT Press.

  • Boolos G. (eds) (1990a) Meaning and method: Essays in honor of Hilary Putnam. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Boolos, G. (1990b). The standard equality of numbers. In Boolos (1990a), pp. 261–278. Reprinted in Boolos (1998), pp. 202–219.

  • Boolos G. (1998). Logic, logic and logic. Cambridge, Harvard

    Google Scholar 

  • Dummett M. (1991). Frege: Philosophy of mathematics. London, Duckworth

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine K. (2002). The limits of abstraction. Oxford, Clarendon Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Hale, B., & Wright, C. (2001). The reason’s proper study: Essays towards a Neo-Fregean philosophy of mathematics. Clarendon Press.

  • Heck R. (1992). On the consistency of second-order contextual definitions. Noûs 26, 491–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hellman G. (1989). Mathematics without numbers. Oxford, Clarendon Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Jané I., Uzquiano G. (2004). Well- and non-well-founded Fregean extensions. Journal of Philosophical Logic 33(5): 437–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jech, T. J. (Ed.). (1974). Proceedings of the symposia on pure mathematics, Axiomatic set theory (Vol. 13). Providence: American Mathematical Society.

  • Linnebo, Ø., & Uzquiano, G. (2007). Is stability sufficient for acceptability? Unpublished typescript.

  • McGee V. (1997). How we learn mathematical language. Philosophical Review 106, 35–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montague, R. (1965). Set theory and higher-order logic. In J. N. Crossley, & M. Dummett (Eds.), Formal systems and recursive functions. North-Holland Publishing Company.

  • Rayo, A. (2005). Logicism reconsidered. In Shapiro (2005), pp. 203–235.

  • Rayo A., Uzquiano G. (1999). Toward a theory of second-order consequence. The Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 40, 315–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rayo, A., & Uzquiano, G. (2004). A puzzle for structuralism. Unpublished typescript.

  • Reinhardt, W. (1974). Remarks on reflection principles, large cardinals, and elementary embeddings, Axiomatic set theory. In T. Jech (Ed.), Proceedings of symposia in pure mathematics (Vol. 13(2), pp. 189–205). Providence: American Mathematical Society.

  • Resnik M. (1997). Mathematics as a science of patterns. Oxford, Clarendon Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Schirn M. (eds) (1998). Philosophy of mathematics today. Oxford, Clarendon Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro S. (1991). Foundations without foundationalism: A case for second-order logic. Oxford, Clarendon Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro S. (1997). Philosophy of mathematics: Structure and ontology. Oxford, Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro S. (2000). Frege meets Dedekind: A neologicist treatment of real analysis. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 41(4): 335–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro S. (eds) (2005). The Oxford handbook for logic and the philosophy of mathematics. Oxford, Clarendon Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Uzquiano G. (1999). Models of second-order Zermelo set theory. Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 5(3): 289–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uzquiano G. (2002). Categoricity theorems and conceptions of set. The Journal of Philosophical Logic 31(2): 181–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uzquiano G. (2006a). The price of universality. Philosophical Studies 129, 137–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uzquiano, G. (2006b).Unrestricted unrestricted quantification: The cardinal problem of absolute generality. In A. Rayo, & G. Uzquiano (Eds.), Absolute generality (pp. 305–332). Oxford University Press.

  • Weir A. (2003). Neo-fregeanism: An embarrassment of riches. The Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 44(1): 13–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zermelo E. (1930). Über Grenzzahlen und Mengenbereiche: Neue Untersuchungen über die Grundlagen der Mengenlehre. Fundamenta Mathematicae 16, 29–47

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Oxford University, Oxford, UK

    Gabriel Uzquiano

Authors
  1. Gabriel Uzquiano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gabriel Uzquiano.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Uzquiano, G. Bad company generalized. Synthese 170, 331–347 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-007-9266-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-007-9266-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation