Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effects of Family Socialization in the Organizational Commitment of the Family Firms from the Moral Economy Perspective

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examines the effects of socializing activity of the owned family in family firms in order to find out if the special characteristics of the socializing processes in this type of firm can contribute to defining a climate that favors employees’ commitment to the organization. For this purpose, this study uses the main arguments of the sociological approach known as moral economy. The data required for this analysis was collected using a self-administered postal questionnaire and the results show that the special type of socialization that takes place in the family firm, and particularly the emotional mediation that this type of socialization tends to entail, favors the appearance of noneconomic links between employers and employees. Thus, in family firms the climate favors the management of the affective, normative, and symbolic aspects. The authors consider that this provides an explanation for the higher levels of identification, involvement, and loyalty – and consequently organizational commitment – that they find empirically among the employees of such firms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, J.; Tashchian, A. and Shore, T. (1996). “Ethics in Family and Non-Family Owned Firms: An Exploratory Study”. Family Business Review, 9: 157-170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, N. and Meyer, J. (1990). “The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization”. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63, 1-18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amat, J.: 1998, La Continuidad de la Empresa Familia (Gestión 2000, Barcelona).

  • Aronoff, C. and Ward, J. (1995). “Family-Owned Business: A Thing of the Past or a Model of the Future?”. Family Business Review, 8: 121-130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer,T; Morrison, E. and Callister, R. (1998). “Organizational Socialization: A Review of Directions and Future Research”. In Forris, G. (Ed.): Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 16: 149-214. JAI Press, Greenwich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger and Luckmann (1972). La construcción social de la realidad. Buenos Aires, Amorrortu.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bisin, A. and Verdier, T. (2000). “Beyond the Melting Pot: Cultural Transmisión, Marriage and The Evolution of Ethnic and Religious Traits”. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115: 955-988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogler, R. and Somech, A. (2002). “Motives to Study and Socialization Tactics Among University Students”. Journal of Social Psychology, 142: 233-248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1988). La distinción. Crítica social del juicio. Madrid, Taurus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1998): Practical reason: on the theory of action. Palo Alto, Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, B. (1974). “Building Organizational Commitment: The Socialization of Managers in Work Organizations”. Administrative Science Quarterly, 19: 533-546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bush, A.; Smith, R. and Martin, C. (1999). “The Influence of Consumer Socialization Variables on Attitude Toward Advertising: A Comparison of African-Americans and Caucasians”. Journal of Advertising, 28: 13-24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camisón, C.: 1999. ‘Sobre cómo medir las competencias distintivas: un examen empírico de la fiabilidad y validez de los modelos multi-ítem para la medición de los activos intangibles’, Ponencia presentada a la primera conferencia internacional de la academia iberoamericana de dirección de empresa. Actas del congreso, soporte informático.

  • Cartwright, S. and Gale, A. 1995. “Project Management: Different Gender, Different Culture? A Discussion on Gender and Organizational Culture”. Leadership and Organizational Development Journal, 16: 12-16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatman, J. (1991). “Matching People and Organizations: Selection and Socialization in Public Accounting Firm”. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36: 459-484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatman, J. and Jehn, K. (1994). “Assessing the Relationship Between Industry Characteristics and Organizational Culture: How Different Can You Be?”. Academy of Management Journal,37: 522-553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, E. and Gordon, G. (1999). “An Exploration of Industry, Culture and Revenue Growth”. Organization Studies, 20: 397-422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Churchill, N. and Hatten, K. (1987). “Non-Market-Based Transfers of Wealth and Power: A Research Framework for Family Businesses”. American Journal of Small Business, 12: 53-66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danes, S.; Rueter, M.; Kwon, H. and Doherty, W. (2002) “Family FIRO Model: An Application to Family Business”. Family Business Review, 15: 31-43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danes, S; Zuiker, V.; Kean, R. and Arbuthnot, J. (1999). “Predictors of Family Business Tensions and Goal Achievement”. Family Business Review, 12: 241-252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De La Calle, C. and I. Maeztu: 2000, ‘El Compromiso y la Flexibilidad en la Gestión de los Recursos Humanos’, Proceedings of the XIV National Congress, X Spanish-French Congress of AEDEM, Jaén, pp. 485–492.

  • De Las Cuevas, G. (1995). “Socialización”. In Gómez, L. y Canto, J. (Coord.): Psicología Social: 109-115. Biblioteca Eudema, Madrid.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Quijano, S.; Navarro, J. and Cornejo, J. (2000). “Un Modelo Integrado de Compromiso e Identificación con la Organización: Análisis del Cuestionario ASH-ICI”. Revista de Psicología Social Aplicada, 10: 27-60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, J. and Rothbard, N. (2000). “Mechanism Linking Work and Family: Clarifying the Relationship Between Work and Family Constructs”. Academy of Management Review, 25: 178-199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, D. (1986). The Multiple Socialization of the Organization Members. The Academy of Management Review, 6: 309-318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallo, M. (1993). “Cultura en Empresa Familiar”. In Gallo, M. (Ed.): La Empresa Familiar 4.: 225-249. IESE, Publicaciones de la Cátedra de Empresa Familiar. Barcelona.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallo, M. (1995). La Empresa Familiar. Textos y Casos. Praxis, Barcelona.

    Google Scholar 

  • González, L. and De Elena, J. (1999). “Medida de la implicación en el trabajo: propiedades psicométricas y estructura factorial del cuestionario”. Revista de psicología del trabajo y las organizaciones, 15: 23-44.

    Google Scholar 

  • González-Roma, V.; Espejo, B. and Hernández, A. (1994). “Validez Discriminante de dos Medidas de Compromiso Organizacional e Implicación en el Trabajo”. Psicológica, 15: 343-350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, G. (1985). “The Relationship of Corporate Culture to Industry Sector and Corporate Performance”. In Kilmann, R.; Saxton, M.; Serpa, R. and Associates (Eds.): Gaining Control of the Corporate Culture: 103-125. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, G. (1991). “Industry Determinants of Organizational Culture”. Academy of Management Review, 16: 396-415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grapentine, T. (1995). “Problematic Scales: When Measuring Quality, Expectations Scales Exhibit Several Drawbacks”. Marketing Research, 6: 8-12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenhaus, J. and Beutell, N. (1985). Sources of Conflict Between Work and Family Roles”. Academy of Management Review, 10: 76-88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habberson, T. and Williams, M. (1999). “A Resource-Based Framework for Assessing the Strategic Advantages of Family Firms”. Family Business Review, 12 (1): 1-26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iles, P.; Foster, A. and Tinline, G. (1996). “The Changing Relationship Between Work Commitment, Personal Flexibility and Employability: An Evaluation of Field Experiment in Executive Development”. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 11, 18-35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karofsky, P.; Millen, R.; Yilmaz, M.; Smyrnios, K.; Tanewski, G. and Romano, C. (2001). “Work-Family Conflict and Emotional Well-Being in American Family Business”. Family Business Review, 14: 313-324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kets De Vries, M. (1993). “The Dynamics of Family Controlled Firms. The Good News and the Bad News”, Organizational Dynamics, 21: 59-71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lansberg, I. (2000). Los sucesores en la empresa familiar. Cómo planificar la continuidad. Granica, Barcelona.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lodahl, T. and Kejner, M. (1965) “The Definition and Measurement of Job Involvement”. Journal of Applied Psychology, 49: 24-33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loscocco, K. (1997). “Work-Family Linkages Among Self-employed Women and Men”. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 50: 204-226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshack, K. (1998). Entrepreneurial Couples: Making it Work and Work at Home. Davis Black, Palo alto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martín Criado, E. (1995). “Economías morales de las relaciones laborales en grupos de trabajadores jóvenes”. Revista de Economía y Sociología del Trabajo, 29-30: 143-151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martín Criado, E. and J. Izquierdo: 1992–1993, ‘Elementos para una sociología económica de la gestión empresarial de la fuerza de trabajo’, Sociología del Trabajo 17, 121–145.

  • Meyer, J. and Allen, N. (1984). “Testing the Side-bet Theory of Organizational Commitment: Some Methodological Considerations”. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 372-378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. and Allen, N. (1991). “A three-component conceptualization of Organizational Commitment”. Human Resource Management Review, 1, 61-89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. and Allen, N. (1997). Commitment in the Workplace. Theory, Research and Application. Thousand Oaks: Sage: Publications Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrow, P. (1993). The Theory and Measurement of Work Commitment. Jai Press Inc., Greenwich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moscetello, L.: 1990, ‘The Pitcairns Want you’, Family Business Magazine, February, pp. 3–15.

  • Neubauer, F. and Lank, A. (1998). The Family Business: Its Governance for Sustainability. McMillan Business, Hampshire.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. (1987). Teorías Psicométricas. Trillas, México.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, C. (1991): “Strategic Responses to Institutional Processes”. Academy of Management Review, 16 (1): 145-179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, R. (1994). “A Meta-analysis of Cronbach’s Coefficient Alpha”. Journal of Consumer Research, 21: 381-391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, M. (1994). “Industry Mindsets: Exploring the Cultures of Two Macro-Organizational Settings”. Organizational Science, 5: 384-402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ram, M. and Holliday, R. (1993). “Relative merits: family culture and kinship in small firms”. Sociology, 27: 629-648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rocher, G. (1990). Introducción a la sociología general. Herder, Barcelona.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scase, R. and Goffe, R. (1980). The Real World of the Small Business Owner. Groom Helm, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W.: 1995, ‘Introduction: Institutional Theory and Organizations’, in W. Scott and S. Christensen (eds.), The Institutional Construction of Organizations (Sage, Thousand Oaks), pp. 11–23.

  • St. James, H. (1999). “What Can the Family Contribute to Business? Examining Contractual Relationships”. Family Business Review, 12: 61-72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stafford, K.; Duncan, K; Dane, S. and Winter, M. (1999). “A Research Model of Sustainable Family Businesses”. Family Business Review, 12: 197-208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tagiuri, R. and Davis, J.(1996). “Bivalent Attributes of the Family Firm”. Family Business Review, 9: 199-208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, E. P. (1975). La formación histórica de la clase obrera. Barcelona, Laia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vallejo, M. (2005). “Cuando definir es una necesidad: una propuesta integradora y operativa del concepto de empresa familiar”. Investigaciones Europeas de Dirección y Economía de Empresa, 11: 151-171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vernette, E. (1995). “Eficacia de los instrumentos de estudio: evaluación de las escalas de medida”. Investigation and Marketing, 48: 49-66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, J. (1988). “The Special Role of Strategic Planning for Family Businesses”. Family Business Review, 1: 105-117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, J. and Aronoff, G. (1991). “Trust Gives You the Advantage”. Nation’s Business, 79: 42-44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zucker, L. (1977): “The Role of Institutionalization in Cultural Persistence”. American Sociological Review, 42: 726-743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Jaén, Jaén, Spain

    Manuel Carlos Vallejo & Delia Langa

Authors
  1. Manuel Carlos Vallejo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Delia Langa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manuel Carlos Vallejo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vallejo, M.C., Langa, D. Effects of Family Socialization in the Organizational Commitment of the Family Firms from the Moral Economy Perspective. J Bus Ethics 96, 49–62 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0448-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0448-7

Keywords

JEL Codes

Search

Navigation