Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter September 17, 2019

Semantic innocence and Kaplanian inferences

  • Pasi Valtonen ORCID logo EMAIL logo
From the journal SATS

Abstract

The core of Christopher Hom and Robert May’s semantic innocence is the thesis that ethnic slurs have empty extensions. Thereby, a slurring term makes any non-negated slurring sentence false. At the same time, Hom and May emphasise that the most important task in the study of slurs is to explain non-xenophobic understanding of slurs. In this paper, I argue that there is a conflict between the two claims. I show this with Kaplanian inferences, which, in my view, are crucial for the non-xenophobic understanding. After all, slurs offend us because we understand them.

References

Blackburn, Simon. 1984. Spreading the word. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bolinger, Renée. 2017. The pragmatics of slurs. NOÛS 51(3). 439–462.10.1111/nous.12090Search in Google Scholar

Cepollaro, Bianca, and Isidora Stojanovic. 2016. Hybrid evaluatives: In defense of a presuppositional account. Grazer Philosophische Studien 93. 458–488.10.1163/18756735-09303007Search in Google Scholar

Frege, Gottlob. 1964. The basic laws of arithmetic: Exposition of the system. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.10.1525/9780520312364Search in Google Scholar

Hom, Christopher. 2012. A puzzle about pejoratives. Philosophical Studies 159. 383–405.10.1007/s11098-011-9749-7Search in Google Scholar

Hom, Christopher. 2008. The semantics of racial epithets. The Journal of Philosophy 105. 416–440.10.5840/jphil2008105834Search in Google Scholar

Hom, Christopher, and Robert May. 2013. Moral and semantic innocence. Analytic Philosophy 54. 293–313.10.1111/phib.12020Search in Google Scholar

Jeshion, Robin. 2013. Slurs and stereotypes. Analytic Philosophy 54. 314–329.10.1111/phib.12021Search in Google Scholar

Kaplan, David. 2004. The meaning of ‘Ouch’ and ‘Oops’. Unpublished manuscript. http://eecoppock.info/PragmaticsSoSe2012/kaplan.pdf (checked August 23, 2018).Search in Google Scholar

Kaplan, David. 1989. Demonstratives. In J. Almog, J. Perry & H. Wettstein (eds.), Themes from Kaplan, 483–563. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

McCready, Eric. 2010. Varieties of conventional implicature. Semantics & Pragmatics 3. 1–57.10.3765/sp.3.8Search in Google Scholar

Potts, Christopher. 2007. The expressive dimension. Theoretical Linguistics 33(2). 165–198.10.1515/TL.2007.011Search in Google Scholar

Predelli, Stefano. 2013. Meaning without truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199695638.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Predelli, Stefano. 2010. From the expressive to the derogatory. In S. Sawyer (ed.), New waves in philosophy of language, 164–185. Basinstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230248588_9Search in Google Scholar

Williamson, Timothy. 2009. Reference, inference, and the semantics of pejoratives. In J. Almog & P. Leonardi (eds.), The philosophy of David Kaplan, 137–158. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195367881.003.0009Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2019-09-17
Published in Print: 2019-11-26

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 11.6.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/sats-2019-0006/html
Scroll to top button