Abstract
The central thesis of this paper is that, for most issues of multiculturalism, regarding them as a problem of tolerance puts us on the wrong track because there are certain biases inherent in the principle of tolerance. These biases – individualism, combined with a focus on religion and a focus on beliefs rather than on persons or practices – can be regarded as distinctly Protestant. Extending the scope of tolerance may seem a solution but if we really want to counter these biases, the principle of tolerance becomes so general that it loses any distinctive meaning. Therefore, we should accept the limited scope of tolerance and its biases. The principle of tolerance can still be useful for some problems where there is a clear and direct link to political or religious beliefs. Moreover, it should be cherished as a more general attitude or practice in Dutch society. For most problems of multiculturalism, however, we should appeal to broader theoretical frameworks that do justice to persons and practices.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Barry, B., “How Not to Defend Liberal Institutions”, in R. Douglass, M.M. Gerald and H.S. Richardson (eds.), Liberalism and the Good. London: Routledge, 1990, pp. 44–58.
Fotion, N. and G. Elfstrom, Toleration. University of Alabama Press, 1992.
Galeotti, A.E., “Citizenship and Equality: The Place for Toleration”, Political Theory, 21(4) (1993), pp. 585–605.
Gutmann, A. and D. Thompson, “Moral Conflict and Political Consensus”, in R. Douglass, M.M. Gerald and H.S. Richardson (eds.), Liberalism and the Good. London: Routledge, 1990, pp. 125–147.
Hirsch Ballin, E.M.H., “De positie van minderheden in ons rechtsbestel”, in N.J.H. Huls and H.D. Stout (eds.), Recht in een multiculturele samenleving. Zwolle: W.E.J. Tjeenk Willink, 1993, pp. 21–30.
Honneth, A., Kampf um Anerkennung. Zur moralischen Grammatik sozialer Konflikte. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1992.
Jenkinson, S.L., “Two Concepts of Tolerance: Or Why Bayle Is Not Locke”, Journal of Political Philosophy, 4(4) (1996), pp. 302–321.
King, P., Toleration. London: George Allen & Unwin, 1976.
Labuschagne, B.C., Godsdienst en niet-gevestigde religies. Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff, 1994.
Leader, S., “Three Faces of Toleration in a Democracy”, Journal of Political Philosophy, 4(4) (1996), pp. 45–67.
Macedo, S., “Toleration and fundamentalism”, in R.E. Goodin and P. Pettit (eds.), A Companion to Contemporary Political Philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell, 1996, pp.622–628.
Margalit, A., The Decent Society. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1996.
Mendus, S., Toleration and the Limits of Liberalism. Atlantic Highlands: Humanities Press,1989.
Raz, J., The Morality of Freedom. Oxford: Clarendon 1986.
Ree, E., van, “Tolerantie: het 'Osmaanse' versus het moderne model”, in K. Koch and P. Scheffer (eds.), Het nut van Nederland: Opstellen over soevereiniteit en identiteit. Amsterdam: Bert Bakker, 1996, pp. 85–101.
Rooden, P. van, Religieuze Regimes: over godsdienst en maatschappij in Nederland 1570-1990. Amsterdam: Bakker, 1996.
Rood-de Boer, M., “Een verkenning vanuit het personen-, familie-en jeugdrecht”, in N.J.H. Huls and H.D. Stout (eds.), Recht in een multiculturele samenleving. Zwolle: W.E.J. Tjeenk Willink, 1993, pp. 49–60.
Scarman, L., “Individual and Collective Aims”, in S. Mendus and D. Edwards (eds.), On Toleration. Oxford: Clarendon, 1987, pp. 49–62.
Scheffer, P., “Land zonder spiegel: Over de politieke cultuur in Nederland”, in K. Koch and P. Scheffer (eds.), Het nut van Nederland: Opstellen over soevereiniteit en identiteit. Amsterdam: Bert Bakker, 1996, pp. 10–39.
Schermers, H.G., “Uniformerende tendensen in het recht”, in N.J.H. Huls and H.D. Stout (eds.), Recht in een multiculturele samenleving. Zwolle: W.E.J. Tjeenk Willink, 1993, pp. 61–65.
Schuyt, C.J.M., Recht, Orde en Burgerlijke Ongehoorzaamheid. Rotterdam: Universitaire Pers, 1972.
Skolnick, J.H., “Coercion to Virtue”, Southern California Law Review, 41(3) (1968), pp. 588–641.
Taylor, C. et al., Multiculturalism. Examining the Politics of Recognition. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1994.
Van den Brink, B., The Tragedy of Liberalism, PhD dissertation. Utrecht: University of Utrecht, 1997.
Van der Burg, W., Equality versus religious freedom”, Archiv für Rechts-und Sozialphilosophie, 78(2) (1992), pp. 211–218.
Van der Burg, W., Reflections on Collective Rights and State Sovereignty”, in T. van Willigenburg, F.R. Heeger and W. van der Burg (eds.), Nation, State and the Coexistence of Different Communities. Kampen: Kok Pharos, 1995, pp. 221–246.
Van der Burg, W., “Bioethics and Law: A Developmental Perspective”, Bioethics, 11(2) (1997), pp. 91–114.
Vermeulen, B., Vrijheid van geweten, een fundamenteel rechtsprobleem. Arnhem: Gouda Quint, 1989.
Waldron, J., Liberal Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
van der Burg, W. Beliefs, Persons and Practices: Beyond Tolerance. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 1, 227–254 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009951110603
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009951110603