Skip to main content
Log in

Ethics, animals and the environment: A review of recent books

  • Published:
Acta Biotheoretica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Animal liberation ethics and environmental ethics have recently come of age. Concerning concrete moral rules considered by researchers in these areas there is much consensus. Highly general theories formulated to justify the rules are more problematic. However, the search for such theories may well be misguided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Berger, J.J., ed. (1990). Environmental Restoration: Science and Strategies for Restoring the Earth. Washington, Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bormann, F.H. and S.R. Kellert, eds (1991). Ecology, Economics, Ethics. New Haven, Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, A. (1988). Thinking about Nature: An Investigation of Nature, Value and Ecology. London, Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, L.R., C. Flavin and S. Postel (1991). Saving the Planet: How to Shape an Environmentally Sustainable Global Economy. New York and London, W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callicott, J.B. (1989). In Defense of the Land Ethic: Essays in Environmental Philosophy. Albany, SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callicott, J.B. (1990). The case against moral pluralism. Environmental Ethics 12: 98–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheney, J. (1991). Callicott's “Metaphysics of Morals”. Environmental Ethics 13: 311–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, S.R.L. (1977). The Moral Status of Animals. Oxford, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, S.R.L. (1982). The Nature of the Beast: Are Animals Moral? Oxford, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, S.C. and E. Simpson, eds (1989). Anti-Theory in Ethics and Moral Conservatism. Albany, SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, M.S. (1980). Animal Suffering, The Science of Animal Welfare. London, Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, D.R. (1984). Animal Thinking. Cambridge Mass., Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargrove, E.C. (1989). Foundations of Environmental Ethics. Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harlow, E.M. (1992). The human face of nature: environmental values and the limits of nonanthropocentrism. Environmental Ethics 14: 27–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • IUCN/UNEP/WWF (1991). Caring for the Earth: A Strategy for Sustainable Living. Gland, Switzerland, IUCN Publications Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonsen, A.R. and S. Toulmin (1988). The Abuse of Casuistry: A History of Moral Reasoning. Berkeley, University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, L.E. (1991). A Morally Deep World: An Essay on Moral Significance and Environmental Ethics. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, W.R., M.E. Gilpin and J.D. Aber (1987). Restoration Ecology: A Synthetic Approach to Ecological Research. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leopold, A. (1949). A Sand County Almanac and Sketches Here and There. New York, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, F. (1991). The Ecological Self. London, Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayo, D.G. and R.D. Hollander, eds (1991). Acceptable Evidence: Science and Values in Risk Management. Oxford, Oxford University press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeely, J.A. (1988). Economics and Biological Diversity: Developing and Using Economic Incentives to Conserve Biological Resources. Gland, Switzerland, IUCN Publications Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naess, A. and D. Rothenberg (1989). Ecology, Community and Lifestyle. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press (translated by D. Rothenberg).

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton, B.G. (1987). Why Preserve Natural Variety? Princeton, Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plumwood, V. (1991). Ethics and instrumentalism: a response to Janna Thompson. Environmental Ethics 13: 139–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rachels, J. (1990). Created from Animals: The Moral Implications of Darwinism. Oxford, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regan, T. (1984). The Case for Animal Rights. Berkeley, University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodd, R. (1990). Biology, Ethics and Animals. Oxford, Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rollin, B.E. (1989). The Unheeded Cry: Animal Consciousness, Animal Pain and Science. Oxford, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rolston, H. (1989). Philosophy Gone Wild: Environmental Ethics. Buffalo, Prometheus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roughgarden, J., R.M. May and S.A. Levin, eds (1989). Perspectives in Ecological Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sapontzis, S.F. (1987). Morals, Reason, and Animals. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayre, K. (1991). An alternative view of environmental ethics. Environmental Ethics 13: 195–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, P. (1975). Animal Liberation: A New Ethics for Our Treatment of Animals. New York, New York Review.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steen, W.J. van der and H. Kamminga (1991). Laws and natural history in biology. Br. J. Philos. Sci. 42: 445–467.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steen, W.J. van der and A.W. Musschenga (in press). The issue of generality in ethics. J. Value Inq.

  • Stone, C.D. (1987). Earth and Other Ethics: The Case for Moral Pluralism. New York, Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, P.W. (1986). Respect for Nature, A Theory of Environmental Ethics. Princeton, Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J. (1990). A refutation of environmental ethics. Environmental Ethics 12: 147–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varner, G.E. (1991). No holism without pluralism. Environmental Ethics 13: 175–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weston, A. (1991). On Callicott's case against moral pluralism. Environmental Ethics 13: 283–286.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van der Steen, W.J. Ethics, animals and the environment: A review of recent books. Acta Biotheor 40, 339–347 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00046334

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00046334

Key Words

Navigation