Skip to main content
Log in

From analytic psychology to analytic philosophy: The reception of Twardowski's ideas in Cambridge

  • Published:
Axiomathes Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • [Baldwin 1901–2] J. M. Baldwin, ed.,Dictionary of Philosophy and Psychology, 3 Vols., McMillian, New York-London.

    Google Scholar 

  • [Baldwin 1984] Th. Baldwin, “Moore's rejection of idealism”, in [Rorty, Schnee-wind and Skinner 1984], 357–374.

  • [Baldwin 1990] Th. Baldwin,G.E. Moore, Routledge, London-New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • [Bradley 1922] F.H. Bradley,The Principles of Logic, Oxford U.P., London (first ed.: 1883).

    Google Scholar 

  • [Bolzano 1978] B. Bolzano,Grundlegung der Logik; Wissenschaftslehre I/II, ed. by F. Kambartel, Felix Meiner Verlag, Hamburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • [Cavallin 1990] J. Cavallin,Content and Object. Husserl, Twardowski and Psychologism, diss., University of Stockholm, Stockholm.

    Google Scholar 

  • [Griffin 1991] N. Griffin,Russell's Idealist Apprenticeship, Oxford U.p., Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • [Griffin 1993] N. Griffin, “Terms, Relations, Complexes”, in [Irvine and Wedeking 1993].

  • [Irvine and Wedeking 1993] A.D. Irvine and G.A. Wedeking, eds.,Russell and Analytic Philosophy, University of Toronto Press, Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • [Husserl 1979a] E. Husserl, “Intentionale Gegenstände” (1894), HUA XXII, ed. by B. Rang, Kluwer, The Hague, 303–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • [Husserl 1979b] E. Husserl, “Besprechung von K. Twardowski,Zur Lehre vom Inhalt und Gegenstand der Vorstellungen. Eine psychologische Untersuchung”, (Ende 1896), HUA XXII, ed. by B. Rang, Kluwer, The Hague, 349–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • [Husserl 1984] E. Husserl,Logische Untersuchungen, HUA XIX/1, edited by U. Panzer, Kluwer, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • [Hylton 1984] P. Hylton, “The nature of the proposition and the revolt against idealism”, in [Rorty, Schneewind and Skinner 1984], 375–397.

  • [Hylton 1990] P. Hylton,Russell, Idealism and the Emergence of Analytic Philosophy, Oxford U.P., Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • [Meinong 1969] A. Meinong, “Zur Psychologie der Komplexionen und Relationen” (1891),Gesamtausgabe, I, ed. by R. Kindinger and R. Haller, Akademische Druck und Verlagsanstalt, Graz, 281–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • [Meinong 1971] A. Meinong, “Über Gegenstände höherer Ordnung und deren Verhältnis zur inneren Wahrnehmung” (1899),Gesamtausgabe, II, ed. by R. Haller, Akademische Druck und Verlagsanstalt, Graz, 377–480.

    Google Scholar 

  • [Moore 1899] G.E. Moore, “The Nature of Judgment”,Mind, 8, 176–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • [Moore 1901–2] G.E. Moore, articles on “Identity” and on “Truth and Falsity”, in [Baldwin 1901–2].

  • [Moore 1900–1] G.E. Moore, “Identity”,Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 1, 103–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • [Moore 1903] G.E. Moore, “Refutation of Idealism”,Mind, 12, 433–453.

    Google Scholar 

  • [Moore 1976] G.E. Moore,Principia Ethica, Cambridge U.P., Cambridge, (1st ed. 1903).

    Google Scholar 

  • [Moore 1910] G.E. Moore, “Critical Notice of August Messer'sEmpfindung und Denken”,Mind, 19, 395–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • [Moore 1968] G.E. Moore, “An Autobiography”, in [Schilpp 1968], 3–39.

  • [Rorty, Schneewind and Skinner 1984] R. Rorty, J.B. Schneewind and Q. Skinner, eds.,Philosophy in History, Cambridge U.P., Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • [Russell 1969a] B. Russell,Logic and Knowledge, edited by R.C. Marsh, Allen & Unwin, London, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • [Russell 1969b] B. Russell, “On Propositions: what they are and how they mean”, in [Russell, 1969a], 283–320.

  • [Russell 1973a] B. Russell,Essays in Analysis, edited by D. Lackey, Allen & Unwin, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • [Russell 1973b] B. Russell, “Meinong's Theory of Complexes and Assumptions” (1904), in [Russell 1973a], 21–76.

  • [Russell 1973c] B. Russell, “Review of: A. Meinong, Untersuchungen zur Gegenstandstheorie und Psychologie” (1905), in [Russell 1973a], 77–88.

  • [Russell 1983] B. Russell,The Collected Papers of Bertrand Russell, I; Cambridge Essays 1888–1899, K. Blackwell, et al. (eds.), Allen & Unwin, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • [Russell 1990a] B. Russell,Collected Papers, II; Philosophical Papers 1896–1899, N. Griffin and A.C. Lewis (eds.), Allen & Unwin, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • [Russell 1990b] B. Russell, “An Analysis of Mathematical Reasoning” (Manuscript Material) (1898), preceded by an introduction of the editors, in [Russell 1990a], 155–222.

  • [Russell 1992] B. Russell,The Principles of Mathematics, Routledge, London, (1st ed. 1903).

    Google Scholar 

  • [Rusell 1993] B. Russell,The Collected Papers of Bertrand Russell, III; Toward the “Principles of Mathematics” 1900–1902, G.H. Moore (ed.), Allen & Unwin, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • [Schaar 1991] M. van der Schaar,G.F. Stout's Theory of Judgment and Proposition, diss., Leiden.

  • [Schilpp 1968] P.A. Schilpp, ed.,The Philosophy of G.E. Moore, Open Court, La Salle, Ill.

    Google Scholar 

  • [Sebestik 1989] J. Sebestik, “Nicht-existierende Gegenstände und strukturale Ontologie bei Twardowski”,Grazer Philosophische Studien, 35, 175–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • [Simons 1986] P. Simons, “The Anglo-Austrian Analytic Axis”, in [Simons 1992], 143–158.

  • [Simons 1992] P. Simons,Philosophy and Logic in Central Europe from Bolzano to Tarski: Selected Essays, Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • [Smith 1988] B. Smith, “Kasimir Twardowski: An Essay on the Borderlines of Ontology, Psychology and Logic”, in [Szaniawski 1988], 313–373.

  • [Stout 1891a] G.F. Stout, “Thought and Language”,Mind, 16, 181–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • [Stout 1891b] G.F. Stout, “Belief”,Mind, 16, 449–469.

    Google Scholar 

  • [Stout 1892a] G.F. Stout, “Review ofIdee und Perception. Eine erkenntnis-theoretische Untersuchung aus Descartes. Von Dr. Kasimir Twardowski”,Mind, 1 (New Series), 290–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • [Stout 1892b] G.F. Stout, “A General Analysis of Presentations as a Preparatory to the Theory of their Interaction”,Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 2, 107–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • [Stout 1893] G.F. Stout, “The Philosophy of Mr. Shadworth Hodgson”,Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 2, 107–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • [Stout 1894] G.F. Stout, “Review of ‘Zur Lehre vom Inhalt und Gegenstand der Vorstellungen. Eine psychologische Untersuchung. Von. Dr. Twardowski’”,Mind, 3, 274–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • [Stout 1909] G.F. Stout,Analytic Psychology, Swan Sonnenschein & Co., London, New York, 1909 (except for some references identical with the first edition from 1896).

    Google Scholar 

  • [Szaniawski 1988] K. Szaniawski (ed.),The Vienna Circle and the Lvov-Warsaw School, Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • [Twardowski 1892] K. Twardowski,Idee und Perception. Eine erkenntnis-theoretische Untersuchung aus Descartes, Karl Konegen, Wien.

    Google Scholar 

  • [Twardowski 1982] K. Twardowski,Zur Lehre vom Inhalt und Gegenstand der Vorstellungen. Eine psychologische Untersuchung, Philosophia Verlag, München, 1982 (Nachdruck von 1. Auflage, Wien, 1894). Tr. by R. Grossmann,On the Content and Object of Presentations, The Hague, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • [Woleński 1989] J. Woleński,Logic and Philosophy in the Lvov-Warsaw School, Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van der Schaar, M. From analytic psychology to analytic philosophy: The reception of Twardowski's ideas in Cambridge. Axiomathes 7, 295–324 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02357138

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02357138

Keywords

Navigation