References
[Baldwin 1901–2] J. M. Baldwin, ed.,Dictionary of Philosophy and Psychology, 3 Vols., McMillian, New York-London.
[Baldwin 1984] Th. Baldwin, “Moore's rejection of idealism”, in [Rorty, Schnee-wind and Skinner 1984], 357–374.
[Baldwin 1990] Th. Baldwin,G.E. Moore, Routledge, London-New York.
[Bradley 1922] F.H. Bradley,The Principles of Logic, Oxford U.P., London (first ed.: 1883).
[Bolzano 1978] B. Bolzano,Grundlegung der Logik; Wissenschaftslehre I/II, ed. by F. Kambartel, Felix Meiner Verlag, Hamburg.
[Cavallin 1990] J. Cavallin,Content and Object. Husserl, Twardowski and Psychologism, diss., University of Stockholm, Stockholm.
[Griffin 1991] N. Griffin,Russell's Idealist Apprenticeship, Oxford U.p., Oxford.
[Griffin 1993] N. Griffin, “Terms, Relations, Complexes”, in [Irvine and Wedeking 1993].
[Irvine and Wedeking 1993] A.D. Irvine and G.A. Wedeking, eds.,Russell and Analytic Philosophy, University of Toronto Press, Toronto.
[Husserl 1979a] E. Husserl, “Intentionale Gegenstände” (1894), HUA XXII, ed. by B. Rang, Kluwer, The Hague, 303–337.
[Husserl 1979b] E. Husserl, “Besprechung von K. Twardowski,Zur Lehre vom Inhalt und Gegenstand der Vorstellungen. Eine psychologische Untersuchung”, (Ende 1896), HUA XXII, ed. by B. Rang, Kluwer, The Hague, 349–356.
[Husserl 1984] E. Husserl,Logische Untersuchungen, HUA XIX/1, edited by U. Panzer, Kluwer, The Hague.
[Hylton 1984] P. Hylton, “The nature of the proposition and the revolt against idealism”, in [Rorty, Schneewind and Skinner 1984], 375–397.
[Hylton 1990] P. Hylton,Russell, Idealism and the Emergence of Analytic Philosophy, Oxford U.P., Oxford.
[Meinong 1969] A. Meinong, “Zur Psychologie der Komplexionen und Relationen” (1891),Gesamtausgabe, I, ed. by R. Kindinger and R. Haller, Akademische Druck und Verlagsanstalt, Graz, 281–303.
[Meinong 1971] A. Meinong, “Über Gegenstände höherer Ordnung und deren Verhältnis zur inneren Wahrnehmung” (1899),Gesamtausgabe, II, ed. by R. Haller, Akademische Druck und Verlagsanstalt, Graz, 377–480.
[Moore 1899] G.E. Moore, “The Nature of Judgment”,Mind, 8, 176–193.
[Moore 1901–2] G.E. Moore, articles on “Identity” and on “Truth and Falsity”, in [Baldwin 1901–2].
[Moore 1900–1] G.E. Moore, “Identity”,Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 1, 103–127.
[Moore 1903] G.E. Moore, “Refutation of Idealism”,Mind, 12, 433–453.
[Moore 1976] G.E. Moore,Principia Ethica, Cambridge U.P., Cambridge, (1st ed. 1903).
[Moore 1910] G.E. Moore, “Critical Notice of August Messer'sEmpfindung und Denken”,Mind, 19, 395–409.
[Moore 1968] G.E. Moore, “An Autobiography”, in [Schilpp 1968], 3–39.
[Rorty, Schneewind and Skinner 1984] R. Rorty, J.B. Schneewind and Q. Skinner, eds.,Philosophy in History, Cambridge U.P., Cambridge.
[Russell 1969a] B. Russell,Logic and Knowledge, edited by R.C. Marsh, Allen & Unwin, London, New York.
[Russell 1969b] B. Russell, “On Propositions: what they are and how they mean”, in [Russell, 1969a], 283–320.
[Russell 1973a] B. Russell,Essays in Analysis, edited by D. Lackey, Allen & Unwin, London.
[Russell 1973b] B. Russell, “Meinong's Theory of Complexes and Assumptions” (1904), in [Russell 1973a], 21–76.
[Russell 1973c] B. Russell, “Review of: A. Meinong, Untersuchungen zur Gegenstandstheorie und Psychologie” (1905), in [Russell 1973a], 77–88.
[Russell 1983] B. Russell,The Collected Papers of Bertrand Russell, I; Cambridge Essays 1888–1899, K. Blackwell, et al. (eds.), Allen & Unwin, London.
[Russell 1990a] B. Russell,Collected Papers, II; Philosophical Papers 1896–1899, N. Griffin and A.C. Lewis (eds.), Allen & Unwin, London.
[Russell 1990b] B. Russell, “An Analysis of Mathematical Reasoning” (Manuscript Material) (1898), preceded by an introduction of the editors, in [Russell 1990a], 155–222.
[Russell 1992] B. Russell,The Principles of Mathematics, Routledge, London, (1st ed. 1903).
[Rusell 1993] B. Russell,The Collected Papers of Bertrand Russell, III; Toward the “Principles of Mathematics” 1900–1902, G.H. Moore (ed.), Allen & Unwin, London.
[Schaar 1991] M. van der Schaar,G.F. Stout's Theory of Judgment and Proposition, diss., Leiden.
[Schilpp 1968] P.A. Schilpp, ed.,The Philosophy of G.E. Moore, Open Court, La Salle, Ill.
[Sebestik 1989] J. Sebestik, “Nicht-existierende Gegenstände und strukturale Ontologie bei Twardowski”,Grazer Philosophische Studien, 35, 175–188.
[Simons 1986] P. Simons, “The Anglo-Austrian Analytic Axis”, in [Simons 1992], 143–158.
[Simons 1992] P. Simons,Philosophy and Logic in Central Europe from Bolzano to Tarski: Selected Essays, Kluwer, Dordrecht.
[Smith 1988] B. Smith, “Kasimir Twardowski: An Essay on the Borderlines of Ontology, Psychology and Logic”, in [Szaniawski 1988], 313–373.
[Stout 1891a] G.F. Stout, “Thought and Language”,Mind, 16, 181–205.
[Stout 1891b] G.F. Stout, “Belief”,Mind, 16, 449–469.
[Stout 1892a] G.F. Stout, “Review ofIdee und Perception. Eine erkenntnis-theoretische Untersuchung aus Descartes. Von Dr. Kasimir Twardowski”,Mind, 1 (New Series), 290–291.
[Stout 1892b] G.F. Stout, “A General Analysis of Presentations as a Preparatory to the Theory of their Interaction”,Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 2, 107–120.
[Stout 1893] G.F. Stout, “The Philosophy of Mr. Shadworth Hodgson”,Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 2, 107–120.
[Stout 1894] G.F. Stout, “Review of ‘Zur Lehre vom Inhalt und Gegenstand der Vorstellungen. Eine psychologische Untersuchung. Von. Dr. Twardowski’”,Mind, 3, 274–275.
[Stout 1909] G.F. Stout,Analytic Psychology, Swan Sonnenschein & Co., London, New York, 1909 (except for some references identical with the first edition from 1896).
[Szaniawski 1988] K. Szaniawski (ed.),The Vienna Circle and the Lvov-Warsaw School, Kluwer, Dordrecht.
[Twardowski 1892] K. Twardowski,Idee und Perception. Eine erkenntnis-theoretische Untersuchung aus Descartes, Karl Konegen, Wien.
[Twardowski 1982] K. Twardowski,Zur Lehre vom Inhalt und Gegenstand der Vorstellungen. Eine psychologische Untersuchung, Philosophia Verlag, München, 1982 (Nachdruck von 1. Auflage, Wien, 1894). Tr. by R. Grossmann,On the Content and Object of Presentations, The Hague, 1977.
[Woleński 1989] J. Woleński,Logic and Philosophy in the Lvov-Warsaw School, Kluwer, Dordrecht.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
van der Schaar, M. From analytic psychology to analytic philosophy: The reception of Twardowski's ideas in Cambridge. Axiomathes 7, 295–324 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02357138
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02357138