Abstract
Official Dutch food information apparently tries to avoid images but is implicitly shaped by the metaphor that food is fuel. The image of food as fuel and its accompanying view of the body as a machine are not maximally helpful for integrating two important human desires: health and pleasure. At the basis of the split between health and pleasure is the traditional mind–body dichotomy, in which the body is an important source of evil and bodily pleasure is sinful and dangerous. In the search for alternatives, new metaphors are proposed that integrate mind and body as well as pleasure and health. The relevance of metaphors for ethics is at least twofold. (1) Moral thought and theory are at least partly shaped by metaphors. In the light of this growing recognition, the analysis of morality needs innovation. (2) With regard to food, new metaphors, such as slow food, or the image of enjoyment as an art, enable a new search for morally responsible forms of hedonism, based on more love and respect for human as well as animal bodies. But new metaphors are specific and selective, just like old ones. I argue that a search for the best overall metaphor would be misguided, but that more diverse forms of attention to bodily aspects of life, including experiences related to food, will result in richer vocabularies of the body, the mind, and body–mind relations. This holds a promise of moral progress.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
C. M. Condit (2002) ArticleTitle“Recipes or Blueprints for our Genes? How Contexts Selectively Activate the Multiple Meanings of Metaphor” Quarterly Journal of Speech 88 303–325 Occurrence Handle10.1080/00335630209384379
M. Korthals (2004) Before Dinner. Philosophy and Ethics of Food Springer Dordrecht
G. Lakoff M. Johnson (1980) Metaphors We Live By University of Chicago Press Chicago
G. Lakoff M. Johnson (1999) Philosophy in the Flesh; The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought Basic Books New York
B. Nerlich D. C. Clarke (2001) ArticleTitle“Mind, meaning and Metaphor: The Philosophy and Psychology of Metaphor in 19th-century Germany” History of the Human Sciences 14 IssueID2 39–61 Occurrence Handle10.1177/09526950122120952
M. Nestlé (2002) Food Politics. How the Food Industry Influences Nutrition and Health University of California Press Berkeley
Onfray, M. (1993), De Kunst van het Genieten. Baarn, Ambo (originally L’Art de Jouir, 1991)
R. Richard (1991) Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity Cambridge University Press Cambridge (Mass)
R. Shusterman (1997) Practicing Philosophy. Pragmatism and the Philosophical Life Routledge New York
R. Shusterman (2000a) Pragmatist Aesthetics. Living Beauty, Rethinking Art EditionNumber(2nd edn.) Rowman & Littlefield Lanham
R. Shusterman (2000b) Performing Live. Aesthetic Alternatives for the Ends of Art Cornell University Press Ithaca
E. Telfer (1996) Food for Thought; Philosophy and Food Routledge London
C. Weele Particlevan der (2005) “Images of the Genome. From Public Debates to Biology. And Back. And Forth” T. Reydon L. Hemerik (Eds) Theoretical Biology. The Dutch Perspective Springer Dordrecht
G. Riel Particlevan (2001) ArticleTitle“Plato en Aristoteles; Twee paradigma’s van genot” Tijdschrift voor Filosofie 63 493–516
M. Visser (1986) Much Depends on Dinner Penguin London
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
van der Weele, C. “Food Metaphors and Ethics: Towards More Attention for Bodily Experience”. J Agric Environ Ethics 19, 313–324 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-005-6165-z
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-005-6165-z