Abstract
The main theme of the article, which by genre falls into the area of semiotically influenced philosophy, is a reflection on the relationship between the human and the non-human, using two partial but parallel discourses. The first discourse is the perspective of general semiotics, which is defined in the article on the basis of two distinct forms of rationality that, in different guises, still intervene in debates about the nature of the humanities and social sciences today. The first form of this rationality is semiological, which can be classified under the encyclopaedic rubric of structuralism, and which has its main source of inspiration in general linguistics and its continuation in philosophical anti-humanism. The second perspective has its origins in Peirce’s logicist theory of the sign and his pragmatist metaphysics, and opens up thinking about the sign, the human, and the non-human to a non-language-centric view of the world. Despite their demonstrable theoretical and methodological incompatibility, the present text treats them as incompatible but largely complementary perspectives. It is in their mutual exposition that one can see the moments in which the view of modern human as a semiological and semiotic animal takes shape. The text brings this fundamental and founding theoretical schism into focus by examining two images from post/modern art: Ted Chiang’s “The Great Silence” and Jorge Luis Borges’ “Averroës’s Search.”
Funding source: Focal images: Violence and Inhumanism in contemporary art and media culture
Award Identifier / Grant number: GACR 22-17984S
-
Research funding: The study was funded by the Czech Science Foundation (GAČR), project No. 22-17984S: Focal images: Violence and Inhumanism in contemporary art and media culture.
References
Ajvaz, Michal. 2003. Sny gramatik, záře písmen: Setkání s Jorgem Luisem Borgesem [Dreams of grammars, glow of letters: Meeting Jorge Luis Borges]. Prague: Hynek.Search in Google Scholar
Anderson, Douglas. 1984. Peirce on metaphor. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 20(4). 453–468.Search in Google Scholar
Atkins, K. Richard. 2023. Peirce on inference: Validity, strength, and the community of inquirers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780197689066.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland. 1957. Mythologies: Essais. New York: French and European.Search in Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland. 1964. L’activité structuraliste. In Essais, 213–220. Paris: Seuil.Search in Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland. 2014. Roland Barthes, par Roland Barthes. Paris: Points.Search in Google Scholar
Benoist, Jean-Marie. 1975. La revolution structurale. Paris: Bernard Grasset.Search in Google Scholar
Binet, Laurent. 2015. La septième fonction du langage. Paris: Grasset.Search in Google Scholar
Borges, L. Jorge. 1999. Collected fictions. London: Penguin.Search in Google Scholar
Carey, Susan. 2011. Precis of the origin of concepts. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34(3). 113–124. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x10000919.Search in Google Scholar
Chiang, Ted, Allora Jennifer & Calzadilla Guillermo. 2014. The great silence. https://www.e-flux.com/live/322227/allora-amp-calzadilla-in-collaboration-with-ted-chiang-nbsp-the-great-silence-presented-by-filipa-ramos (accessed 2 August 2023).Search in Google Scholar
Chiang, Ted. 2015. The great silence. E-flux Journal 65(5). https://www.e-flux.com/journal/65/336684/the-great-silence (accessed 2 August 2023).Search in Google Scholar
Chiang, Ted. 2018. Author Ted Chiang discusses the making of the great silence. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y7rkojpnwOE (accessed 23 May 2023).Search in Google Scholar
Ćirković, M. Milan. 2018. “The great silence”: Science and philosophy of Fermiʼs paradox. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Cobley, Paul. 2016. Cultural implications of biosemiotics. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-94-024-0858-4Search in Google Scholar
Deacon, W. Terrence. 1997. The symbolic species: The co-evolution of language and the brain. New York: W. W. Norton.Search in Google Scholar
Deely, John. 2001. Four ages of understanding. The first postmodern survey of philosophy from ancient times to the turn of the twenty-first century. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.10.3138/9781442675032Search in Google Scholar
Deely, John. 2011a. Postmodernity as the unmasking of objectivity: Identifying the positive essence of postmodernity as a distinct new era in the history of philosophy. Semiotica 183(1/4). 31–57. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.2011.003.Search in Google Scholar
Deely, John. 2011b. Semiotic animal: A postmodern definition of human being transcending patriarchy and feminism. South Bend: St. Augustine’s Press.Search in Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles. 2002. Desert islands and other texts 1953–1974. Cambridge: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 1967a. Lʼecriture et la différence. Paris: Seuil.Search in Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 1967b. De la grammatologie. Paris: Editions de Minuit.Search in Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 2008. The animal that therefore I am. New York: Fordham University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Descombes, Vincent. 1979. La même et l’autre: Quarante-cinq ans de philosophie française (1933–1978). Paris: Minuit.Search in Google Scholar
Dosse, François & Deborah Glassman. 1997. The sign sets 1967–present (History of structuralism 2). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Search in Google Scholar
Dusi, Nicola. 2015. Intersemiotic translation: Theories, problems, analysis. Semiotica 206(1/4). 181–205. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2015-0018.Search in Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto. 1968. La struttura assente: Introduzione alla ricerca semiologica. Milan: Bompiani.Search in Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto. 1975. Looking for a logic of culture. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783112327463Search in Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto. 1976. A theory of semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.10.1007/978-1-349-15849-2Search in Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto. 1977. Semiotics of theatrical performance. The Drama Review 21(1). 107–117. https://doi.org/10.2307/1145112.Search in Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto. 1984. Semiotics and the philosophy of language. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.10.1007/978-1-349-17338-9Search in Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto. 2000. Kant and the platypus: Essays on language and cognition, Alastair McEwen (trans.). London: Harvest.Search in Google Scholar
Eskola, Timo. 2021. Chapter 5. Reading Peirce in Paris: Derrida’s poststructuralist semiotics. In New testament semiotics, 189–218. The Netherlands: Brill.10.1163/9789004465763_007Search in Google Scholar
Esposito, Joseph. 2005. Synechism: The keystone of Peirceʼs metaphysics. The commens encyclopedia: The digital cncyclopedia of Peirce studies. https://philpapers.org/rec/ESPSTK (accessed 2 August 2023).Search in Google Scholar
Ey, Henri. 1978. Consciousness: A phenomenological study of being conscious and becoming conscious, John H. Flodstorm (trans.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Fabbri, Paolo. 2015. Human interference task force. https://www.paolofabbri.it/recensioni-e-commenti/human_interference_task_force/ (accessed 23 May 2023).Search in Google Scholar
Flemming, M. Timothy, J. Michael Beran, K. R. Roger Thompson, Kleider M Heather & Washburn A David. 2008. What meaning means for same and different: Analogical reasoning in humans (Homo sapiens), chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), and rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). Journal of Comparative Psychology 122(2). 176–185. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7036.122.2.176.Search in Google Scholar
Flynn, R. Thomas. 1997. Toward an existentialist theory of history (Sartre, Foucault, and historical reason 1). Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226254692.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1966. Les mots et les choses: Une archéologie des sciences humaines. Paris: Gallimard.Search in Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1970. The order of things: An archaeology of the human sciences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1975. Surveiller et punir: Naissance de la prison. Paris: Gallimard.Search in Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1977. Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York: Pantheon Books.Search in Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1980. Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977. New York: Pantheon.Search in Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1987. Maurice Blanchot: The thought from outside. In Maurice Blanchot & Michel Foucault (eds.), Foucault/blanchot, 9–58. New York: Zone.Search in Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1994a. Dits et écrits: 1954–1988, Vol. 1. Paris: Gallimard.10.14375/NP.9782070739899Search in Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1994b. Dits et écrits: 1954–1988, Vol. 4. Paris: Gallimard.10.14375/NP.9782070739882Search in Google Scholar
Garver, Newton. 1986. Structuralism and the challenge of metaphor. Philosophy and Literary Theory 69(1). 68–86. https://doi.org/10.5840/monist19866912.Search in Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford. 1973. The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays. New York: Basic.Search in Google Scholar
Gentner, Dedre. 1989. The mechanisms of analogical learning. In Stella Vosniadou & Andrew Ortony (eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning, 199–241. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511529863.011Search in Google Scholar
Gourlay, Lesley. 2015. Posthuman texts: Nonhuman actors, mediators and the digital university. Social Semiotics 25(4). 484–500. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2015.1059578.Search in Google Scholar
Henrickson, Leah. 2023. Chatting with the dead: The hermeneutics of thanabots. Media, Culture & Society 45(5). 949–966. https://doi.org/10.1177/01634437221147626.Search in Google Scholar
Hoffmeyer, Jesper & Frederik Stjernfelt. 2016. The great chain of semiosis: Investigating the steps in the evolution of semiotic competence. Biosemiotics 9. 7–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-015-9247-y.Search in Google Scholar
Jenkins, Alan. 1979. Anthropology as a semiology: Lévi-Strauss’s methodological protocols. In The social theory of Claude Lévi-Strauss, 4–38. London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-1-349-03683-7_2Search in Google Scholar
Kohn, Eduardo. 2013. How forests think: Toward an anthropology beyond the human. Berkeley: University of California Press.10.1525/california/9780520276109.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Kull, Kalevi. 2009. Vegetative, animal, and cultural semiosis: The semiotic threshold zones. Cognitive Semiotics 4. 8–27. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogsem.2009.4.spring2009.8.Search in Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 1999. Pandoraʼs hope. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Legg, Catherine. 2018. Peirce and Sellars on nonconceptual content. In Luca Corti & Antonio Nunziante (eds.), Sellars and the history of modern philosophy, 125–143. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315159546-7Search in Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 1958. Anthropologie structurale. Paris: Plon.Search in Google Scholar
Liszka, James J. 1989. The semiotic of myth: A critical study of the symbol. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Locke, Gordon. 2000. Peirce’s metaphysics: Evolution, synechism, and the mathematical conception of the continuum. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 36(1). 133–147.Search in Google Scholar
Lovejoy, O. Arthur. 1963. The great chain of being: A study of the history of an idea. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674040335Search in Google Scholar
Manetti, Giovanni. 1993. Theories of the sign in classical antiquity. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Margolis, Joseph. 2016. Persons as natural artifacts. Pragmatism Today 7(2). 8–22.Search in Google Scholar
Martinelli, Dario. 2016. Animal cognition, speciesism, humanism: Reflections on the notion of “semiotic animal. Athena 11. 156–171.Search in Google Scholar
Maslov, Boris. 2012. The real life of the genre of prooimion. Classical Philology 107(3). 191–205. https://doi.org/10.1086/665621.Search in Google Scholar
Mazzeo, Marco. 2018. The chess analogy: Wittgenstein and Saussure compared. Cahiers Ferdinand de Saussure 71. 61–78.Search in Google Scholar
McConnell, Anne. 2022. Listening to terrestrial voices in ted Chiang’s “the great silence”. Literature 2(2). 77–89. https://doi.org/10.3390/literature2020007.Search in Google Scholar
McJohn, Stephen. 1993. On uberty: Legal reasoning by analogy and Peirce’s theory of abduction. Willamette Law Review 29. 191–135.Search in Google Scholar
McLuhan, Marshall. 1994. Understanding media: The extensions of man. Cambridge: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar
Minnameier, Gerhard. 2004. Peirce-suit of truth: Why inference to the best explanation and abduction ought not to be confused. Erkenntnis 60(1). 75–105. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:erke.0000005162.52052.7f.10.1023/B:ERKE.0000005162.52052.7fSearch in Google Scholar
Misievicz, Rory. 2020. Peirce on analogy. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 56(3). 299–325.10.2979/trancharpeirsoc.56.3.01Search in Google Scholar
Nagy, William & Dedre Genter. 1990. Semantic constraints on lexical categories. Language & Cognitive Processes 5(3). 169–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690969008402104.Search in Google Scholar
Nöth, Winfried. 2000. Umberto Eco’s semiotic threshold. Sign Systems Studies 28. 49–61. https://doi.org/10.12697/sss.2000.28.03.Search in Google Scholar
Nöth, Winfried. 2001. Protosemiotics and physicosemiosis. Sign Systems Studies 29(1). 13–26. https://doi.org/10.12697/sss.2001.29.1.02.Search in Google Scholar
Office of Scientific and Technical Information. 1984. Reducing the likelihood of future human activities that could affect geologic high-level waste repositories. https://www.osti.gov/biblio/6799619 (accessed 23 May 2023).Search in Google Scholar
Olteanu, Alin. 2022. Learning as becoming conscious: A note on Jablonka and Ginsburg’s notion of learning. Biosemiotics 15. 457–467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-022-09510-x.Search in Google Scholar
Olteanu, Alin & Andrew Stables. 2018. Learning and adaptation from a semiotic perspective. Sign Systems Studies 46(4). 409–434. https://doi.org/10.12697/sss.2018.46.4.01.Search in Google Scholar
O’Neill, L. J. 1998. Aspects of Peirce’s theory of inference. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 34(2). 436–449.Search in Google Scholar
Pablé, Adrian. 2016. Global semiotics vs. human semiology: Understanding communication in the 21st century. Chinese Semiotic Studies 12(1). 25–43. https://doi.org/10.1515/css-2016-0004.Search in Google Scholar
Paolucci, Claudio. 2020. Cognitive semiotics: Integrating signs, mind, and culture. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-42986-7Search in Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles S. 1931–1966. The collected papers of Charles S. Peirce, 8 vols., Charles Hartshorne, Paul Weiss & Arthur W. Burks (eds.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press. [Reference to Peirce’s papers will be designated CP followed by volume and paragraph number.]Search in Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles S. 1992. Essential Peirce: Selected philosophical writings, vol. 1 (1867–1893), Nathan Houser & Christian Kloesel (eds.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press. [Reference to vol. 1 of Essential Peirce will be designated EP 1.]Search in Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles S. 1998. Essential Peirce: Selected philosophical writings, vol. 2 (1893–1913), Peirce Edition Project (eds.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press. [Reference to vol. 2 of Essential Peirce will be designated EP 2.]Search in Google Scholar
Pepperberg, Irene M. 1983. Cognition in the African Grey parrot: Preliminary evidence for auditory/vocal comprehension of the class concept. Animal Learning & Behavior 11. 179–185. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03199646.Search in Google Scholar
Pepperberg, Irene M. 1985. Social modeling theory: A possible framework for understanding avian vocal learning. The Auk: Ornithological Advances 102. 854–864.Search in Google Scholar
Pepperberg, Irene M. 1987. Acquisition of the same/different concept by an African Grey parrot (Psittacus erithacus): Learning with respect to categories of color, shape, and material. Animal Learning & Behavior 15. 423–432. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03205051.Search in Google Scholar
Pepperberg, Irene M. 2002. The Alex studies: Cognitive and communicative abilities of grey parrots. Cambridge, London & Manchester: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Pepperberg, Irene M. 2006. Grey parrot numerical competence: A review. Animal Cognition 9. 377–391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-006-0034-7.Search in Google Scholar
Petrilli, Susan & Augusto Ponzio. 2009. Semioethics. In Paul Cobley (ed.), The Routledge companion to semiotics, 138–151. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Plato. 2008. In Nicholas Denyer (ed.), Protagoras (Cambridge Greek and Latin Classics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Queiroz, João. 2012. Dicent symbols in non-human semiotic processes. Biosemiotics 5. 319–329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-011-9138-9.Search in Google Scholar
Renan, Ernesto. 1949. Averroès et lʼaverroïsme. Paris: Calmann-Lévy.Search in Google Scholar
Sabbatini, Gloria & Elisabetta Visalberghi. 2008. Inferences about the location of food in capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) in two sensory modalities. Journal of Comparative Psychology 122(2). 156–166. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7036.122.2.156.Search in Google Scholar
Saussure de, Ferdinand. 2013 [1916]. Course in general linguistics. London: Bloomsbury.Search in Google Scholar
Short, Thomas L. 2007. Peirce’s theory of signs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Sim, Stuart. 2016. Structuralism and semiotics. In The Edinburg companion to critical theory, 55–70. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.10.1515/9780748693405-008Search in Google Scholar
Stjernfelt, Frederik. 2014. Natural propositions: The actuality of Peirce’s doctrine of dicisigns. Docent Press.10.1007/s11229-014-0406-5Search in Google Scholar
Švantner, Martin. 2019. Inferring ears: Cognitive semiotics and musical anthroposemiosis. The American Journal of Semiotics 35(1/2). 93–115. https://doi.org/10.5840/ajs201982256.Search in Google Scholar
Švantner, Martin. 2020. Two basic analyses of the historiography of semiotics: M. Foucault’s comparative semiology and J. N. Deely’s semiotic realism. Semiotica 233(1/4). 159–177. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2017-0108.Search in Google Scholar
Švantner, Martin. 2022. Agency as semiotic fabrication. A comparative study of Latour’s ANT. The American Journal of Semiotics 37(3/4). 289–315. https://doi.org/10.5840/ajs202231579.Search in Google Scholar
Ungar, Steven. 1975. Review: Waiting for Blanchot. Diacritics 5(2). 32–36. https://doi.org/10.2307/464640.Search in Google Scholar
Vaught, Carl. 1986. Semiotics and the problem of analogy: A critique of Peirce’s theory of categories. Transactions of the Charles S Peirce Society 22(3). 311–326.Search in Google Scholar
Visalberghi, Elisabetta, Gloria Sabbatini & Valentina Truppa. 2011. Analogical reasoning: What capuchin monkeys can tell us? In B. Kokinov, A. Karmiloff-Smith & N. J. Nersessian (eds.), European perspectives on cognitive science. Sofia: New Bulgarian University Press.Search in Google Scholar
© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
