Abstract
In accordance with Progressivism, Matthew Lipman, introduced an educational model for renewal and change by means of the child. With his Philosophy for Children programme he wished to offer an alternative for the intellectualistic oriented education which silenced children. The answer to the search for freedom and change, Lipman finds in the symbioses between ‘Philosophy’ and ‘Children’. Philosophy expressed in critical thinking and communication, was the basis to emancipate the child from the oppression of the adult and to cause change. According to Lipman the main purpose of philosophy is to free every individual from determination. This plea is being elaborated by dialogue. The main issue of our paper concerns the question whether Lipman’s alternative ‘Philosophy for Children’ can fulfil the promise of change and freedom. To answer this question we will investigate thoroughly where dialogue and change in Philosophy for Children stand for. Finally we will propose another perspective of dialogue. A dialogue stressed on listening. Listening to how the world appears to us and how we appear to ourselves.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
M. Bakhtin (1999) The hero, and the position of the author with regard to the hero, in Dostoevsky’s Art C. Emerson (Eds) Mikhail Bakhtin, problems of Dostoevsky’s poetics University of Minnesota Press Minneapolis 47–77
I. Devisch (2003) Wij. Jean-Luc Nancy en het vraagstuk van de gemeenschap in de hedendaagse wijsbegeerte Peeters Leuven
M.F. Daniel M. Schleifer P. Lebouis (1992) ArticleTitlePhilosophy for children: The continuation of Dewey’s democratic project Analytic Teaching 13 IssueID1 3–12
E. Duarte (2001) The eclipse of thinking: An Arendtian critique of cooperative learning G. Mordechai (Eds) Hannah Arendt and Education, renewing our common world Westview Press Oxford
R. Fisher (1998) Teaching thinking. Philosophical enquiry in the classroom Continuum London
M. Holquist (2002) Dialogism Routledge New York
Kennedy, D. (1999a). Reconstructing childhood. In Palsson H., Siguroardottir B. and Nelson B (Eds), Philosophy for children on top of the world, proceedings of the eight international conference on philosophy with children (pp. 139–154). Iceland: University of Akureyri.
D. Kennedy (1999b) ArticleTitleThinking for oneself and with others Analytic Teaching 20 IssueID1 29–32
W. Kohan (1999) ArticleTitleWhat can philosophy and children offer each other? Thinking, the Journal of Philosophy for Children 14 IssueID4 2–8
M. Lipman A.M. Sharp F.S. Oscanyan (1980) Philosophy in the classroom Temple University Press Philadelphia
M. Lipman (1988) Philosophy goes to school Temple University Press Philadelphia
M. Lipman (2003) Thinking in education University Press Cambridge
G.B. Matthews (1994) The philosophy of childhood Harvard University Press Cambridge
G.B. Matthews (2000) ArticleTitleCreativity in the philosophical thinking of children Thinking, the Journal of Philosophy for Children 15 IssueID1 14–19
G.S. Morson C. Emerson (1990) Michail Bakhtin. Creation of a prosaics Standford University Press Standford
K. Murris (2000) ArticleTitleCan children do philosophy? Journal of Philosophy of Education 34 IssueID2 84–93
J.L. Nancy (2002) A l’écouté Galilée Paris
J. Ranciere (1998) Au bord du politique La fabrique Paris
B. Readings (1996) From emancipation to obligation: Sketch for a heteronomous politics of education M. Peters (Eds) Education and the postmodern condition Bergin and Garvey Auckland & New York 193–207
M. Sharp (1999) The sacred - as – relationship in the community of inquiry H. Palsson B. Siguroardottir B. Nelson (Eds) Philosophy for children on top of the world, proceedings of the eight international conference on philosophy with children University of Akureyri Iceland 5–19
H. Siegel (1997) Rationality redeemed? Further dialogues on and educational ideal Routledge London
L. Splitter A. Sharp (1995) Teaching for better thinking ACER Melborne
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Nancy Vansieleghem is working on a Ph.D. in Philosophy of Education at the Department of Education at the University of Gent, Belgium. Her main area of research is philosophy of dialogue and public space.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vansieleghem, N. Listening to Dialogue. Stud Philos Educ 25, 175–190 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-006-0008-x
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-006-0008-x