Abstract
Except in very poor mathematical contexts, mathematical arguments do not stand in isolation of other mathematical arguments. Rather, they form trains of formal and informal arguments, adding up to interconnected theorems, theories and eventually entire fields. This paper critically comments on some common views on the relation between formal and informal mathematical arguments, most particularly applications of Toulmin’s argumentation model, and launches a number of alternative ideas of presentation inviting the contextualization of pieces of mathematical reasoning within encompassing bodies of explicit and implicit, formal and informal background knowledge.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aberdein A. (2006) Managing informal mathematical knowledge: Techniques from informal logic. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 108: 208–221
Aberdein A. (2007) The informal logic of mathematical proof. In: Van Kerkhove B., Van Bendegem J.P.(eds) Perspectives on mathematical practices. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 135–151
Aigner M., Ziegler G.M. (1998) Proofs from the book. Springer, New York
Aschbacher M. (2004) The status of the classification of the finite simple groups. Notices of the AMS 51(7): 736–740
Cipra, B. (1996). What’s happening in the mathematical sciences. Vol. 3. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI.
Davis P.J. (1972) Fidelity in mathematical discourse: Is one and one really two?. American Mathematical Monthly 79(3): 252–263
Kline, M. (1990). Mathematical thought from ancient to modern times. New York: Oxford University Press. (Three volumes, second printing of the 1972 original edition.)
Kolodziejczyk L., Thapen N. (2008) The polynomial and linear hierarchies in models where the weak pigeonhole principle fails. The Journal of Symbolic Logic 73(2): 578–592
Lamé G. (1839) Mémoire sur le Dernier Théorème de Fermat. Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Sciences 9: 45–46
Nelsen R.B. (1993) Proofs without words. Exercises in visual thinking. Washington DC, The Mathematical Association of America
Nelsen R.B. (2000) Proofs without words II. More exercises in visual thinking. Washington DC, The Mathematical Association of America
Netz R. (1999) The shaping of deduction in Greek mathematics. A study in cognitive history. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Otte M., Panza M. (1997). Analysis and synthesis in mathematics: History and philosophy. Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers
Pólya G. (1919) Verschiedene Bemerkungen zur Zahlentheorie. Jahresbericht der deutschen Math.- Vereinigung 28: 31–40
Pólya, G. (1973). Mathematics and plausible reasoning. Vol. I: Induction and analogy in mathematics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (eighth printing of the 1954 original).
Queneau, R. (1978). Bords. Mathématiciens. Précurseurs. Encyclopédistes. Paris: Hermann. (first edition 1963).
Rotman B. (2000) Mathematics as sign. Writing, imagining, counting. Stanford University Press, Stanford
Solomon R. (1995) On finite simple groups and their classification. Notices of the AMS 42(2): 231–239
Solomon R. (2001) A brief history of the classification of the finite simple groups. Bulletin (New Series) of the AMS 38(3): 315–352
Thomas R. (2000) Mathematics and fiction I: Identification. Logique et Analyse 43: 301–340
Thomas R. (2002) Mathematics and fiction II: Analogy. Logique et Analyse 45: 185–228
Thurston W.P. (1994) On proof and progress in mathematics. Bulletin (New Series) of the AMS 30(2): 161–177
Van Bendegem, J. P. (To appear I). Elements for a rhetoric of mathematics: How proofs can be convincing. In C. Dègremont, L. Keiff, & H. Rückert (Eds.), Festschrift in honour of Shahid Rahman, London: College Publications.
Van Bendegem, J. P. (To appear II). ‘What-if’ stories in mathematics: An alternative route to complex numbers. In M. Khissine et al. (Eds.), Liber amicorum Marc Dominicy.
Van Kerkhove B., &Van Bendegem J.P. (2008) Pi on earth, or mathematics in the real world. Erkenntnis 68(3): 421–435
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Van Bendegem, J.P., Van Kerkhove, B. Mathematical Arguments in Context. Found Sci 14, 45–57 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-008-9146-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-008-9146-7