Abstract
One of the most interesting and entertaining philosophical discussions of the last few decades is the discussion between Daniel Dennett and John Searle on the existence of intrinsic intentionality. Dennett denies the existence of phenomena with intrinsic intentionality. Searle, however, is convinced that some mental phenomena exhibit intrinsic intentionality. According to me, this discussion has been obscured by some serious misunderstandings with regard to the concept ‘intrinsic intentionality’. For instance, most philosophers fail to realize that it is possible that the intentionality of a phenomenon is partly intrinsic and partly observer relative. Moreover, many philosophers are mixing up the concepts ‘original intentionality’ and ‘intrinsic intentionality’. In fact, there is, in the philosophical literature, no strict and unambiguous definition of the concept ‘intrinsic intentionality’. In this article, I will try to remedy this. I will also try to give strict and unambiguous definitions of the concepts ‘observer relative intentionality’, ‘original intentionality’, and ‘derived intentionality’. These definitions will be used for an examination of the intentionality of formal mathematical systems. In conclusion, I will make a comparison between the (intrinsic) intentionality of formal mathematical systems on the one hand, and the (intrinsic) intentionality of human beings on the other hand.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
P. Benacerraf H. Putnam (Eds) (1964) Philosophy of Mathematics Cambridge University Press Cambridge
G. Boolos R. Jeffrey (1974) Computability and Logic Cambridge University Press Cambridge
D.C. Dennett (1978) Brainstorms MIT Press Cambridge
D.C. Dennett (1987) The Intentional Stance MIT Press Cambridge
D.C. Dennett (1991) Consciousness Explained Penguin Harmondsworth
D.C. Dennett (1995) Darwin’s Dangerous Idea Penguin Harmondsworth
J. Haugeland (1998) Having Thought Harvard University Press London
D.R. Hofstadter (1979) Gödel, Escher, Bach: an Eternal Golden Braid Penguin Harmondsworth
D.R. Hofstadter D.C. Dennett (Eds) (1981) The Mind’s I: Fantasies and Reflections on Self and Soul Penguin Harmondsworth
S.W Horst (1996) Symbols, Computation, and Intentionality University of California Press London
G. Hunter (1971) Metalogic: An Introduction to the Metatheory of Standard First Order Logic University of California Press Berkeley
G. Lakoff R.E. Núñez (2000) Where Mathematics Comes From: How the Embodied Mind Brings Mathematics into Being Basic Books New York
E. Nagel J.R. Newman (1958) Gödel’s Proof New York University Press New York
D. Nelson (Eds) (1989) The Penguin Dictionary of Mathematics Penguin Harmondsworth
H. Putnam (1975) Mind, Language and Reality Cambridge University Press Cambridge
J.R Searle (1983) Intentionality: An essay in the philosophy of mind Cambridge University Press Cambridge
J.R Searle (1992) The Rediscovery of the Mind MIT Press Cambridge
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Van Moer, A. The Intentionality of Formal Systems. Found Sci 11, 81–119 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-004-5914-1
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-004-5914-1