Abstract
Research councils have traditionally been used by governments to determine the funding allocations of scientific research. During the 1970s and 1980s the traditional “laissez-faire” science policy characteristics of research councils changed. Government policy on fundamental science was conceived as the active search for, and support of scientific fields considered to be of strategic value to economic development.
This article addresses the consequences these changes have had on the objectives and structures of research councils. It will attempt to explain the differential choice of governments in implementing the more active forms of science policy.
An analysis is made of the changing roles and activities of research councils in three nations having active policies on (strategic) fundamental science.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Irvine, J. & Martin, B. (1984).Foresight in Science. Picking the Winners. London: Frances Pinter
Meyer, J.W. & Rowan, B. (1983). “Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure and Ceremony.” In Meyer, J.W. & Richard Scott, W. (Eds.),Organizational Environments. Ritual and Rationality. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Rossum, W. Van (1987).Sturing van Wetenschap. De Rol van Onderzoekorganisaties. (Steering of Science. The Role of Research Councils). The Hague: Staats Drukkerij en Uitgeverij.
Wamsley, G.L. & Zald, M.N. (1976).The Political Economy of Public Organizations: A Critique and Approach to the Study of Public Administration. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Ziman, J.M. (1987).Science in a Steady State: The Research System in Transition. London: Science Policy Study Group.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Van Rossum, W. The political economy of research councils: Different roles of research councils in science policy. Knowledge and Policy 7, 63–78 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02692816
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02692816