Skip to main content
Log in

MORAL RHETORIC IN THE FACE OF STRATEGIC WEAKNESS: EMPERIMENTAL CLUES FOR AN ANCIENT PUZZLE

  • Published:
Erkenntnis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Moralising is a venerable last resort strategy. The ancient Melians presented the Athenian generals with a splendid example when in a particularly tight corner. In our Western philosophical tradition moral rhetoric is often couched in the form of reasons for action either external to preference and desire (eg. Kant) or internal to the agent's calculus of desire (e.g., Hume, Gauthier). A third tradition dismisses such rhetoric as the last recourse of the weak (e.g., Aristotle, Nietzsche) whereas a fourth calls for an examination of the social context (e.g., Socrates, Marx, Wittgenstein, Habermas). This paper reports on an experiment which throws some empirical light on these debates and offers a surprising twist to the interpretation of the Melians' plea.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Aristotle, Politics.

  • Friedman, D.: 1991, 'Evolutionary Games', Econometrica, 59, 637-666

    Google Scholar 

  • Foddy, M.: 1989, 'Information Control as a Bargaining Tactic in Social Exchange', in E. J. Lawler and B. Markovsky Barry (eds.), Advances in Group Processes, Volume 6. A Research Annual, JAI Press, Greenwich, Conn. and London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauthier, D.: 1986, Morals by Agreement, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

  • Gilbert, M.: 1989, On Social Facts, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J.: 1990, Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action, in C. Lenhardt and S. Nicholsen (trans.), Polity Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves Heap, S. and Varoufakis, Y.: 1995, Game Theory: A Critical Introduction, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, G. W. F.: 1953, Reason in History, in J. Baillie (trans.), Macmillan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollis, M.: 1989, 'Honour Among Thieves', Proceedings of the British Academy LXXV, 163-180

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollis, M.: 1991, 'Penny Pinching and Backward Induction', Journal of Philosophy 88, 473-488

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollis, M.: 1993, 'The Agriculture of the Mind' in D. Gauthier and R. Sugden (eds), Rationality, Justice and the Social Contract, Wheatsheaf, Hemel Hempstead.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollis, M. and Sugden, R.: 1993, 'Rationality in Action', Mind 102, 1-35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume, D.: 1740, A Treatise on Human Nature, 1978 edition, Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I.: 1788, Critique of Practical Reason, in L. Beck (trans. and ed.), Critique of Practical Reason and other writings in Moral Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I.: 1959, The Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysic of Morals, Longmans, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K.: 1963, The Poverty of Philosophy, International Publishers, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nietzsche, F.: 1973, Beyond Good and Evil: Prelude to a Philosophy of the Future, Penguin, Hammondsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, P. and Sugden, R.: 1989, 'The Paradox of Backward Induction', Journal of Philosophy 86, 169-182

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, C.: 1993, 'Ethics in Ancient Greece' in P. Singer (ed), A Companion to Ethics, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thucydides, The History of the Peloponnesian War.

  • Varoufakis, Y.: 1991, Rational Conflict, Blackwell, Oxford.

  • Varoufakis, Y.: 1993, 'Modern and Postmodern Challenges to Game Theory', Erkenntnis 38, 371-404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varoufakis, Y. and Hargreaves-Heap, S.: 1994, 'Dominated Cooperative Strategies and Equilibrium Selection: Some Additional Evidence', mimeo, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

  • Wittgenstein, L.: 1953, Philosophical Investigations, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Varoufakis, Y. MORAL RHETORIC IN THE FACE OF STRATEGIC WEAKNESS: EMPERIMENTAL CLUES FOR AN ANCIENT PUZZLE. Erkenntnis 46, 87–110 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005335518281

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005335518281

Keywords

Navigation